Ipad 2 Fans: Beware The Security Risks
#1
Posted 04 March 2011 - 09:06 AM
#2
Posted 04 March 2011 - 09:10 AM
http://www.apple.com...nd-my-ipad.html
That reminds me, I need to do a Time Machine backup of my Macbook Pro.
#3
Posted 04 March 2011 - 09:10 AM
#4
Posted 04 March 2011 - 10:53 AM
#5
Posted 04 March 2011 - 12:44 PM
Papaspud, on 04 March 2011 - 10:53 AM, said:
Until somebody hacks into your MobileMe account and decides to brick all of your devices while you're still in control of them. Then it doesn't seem like such a good idea...
#6
Posted 04 March 2011 - 03:17 PM
#7
Posted 04 March 2011 - 03:28 PM
#9
Posted 04 March 2011 - 08:04 PM
nonseq, on 04 March 2011 - 03:28 PM, said:
Why are you complaining? The point of headlines is to attract attention and get people to read the article. In addition, the title isn't misleading but more direct than your suggested headline. It's not like the article said "Apples" and was really about oranges. It said "Apples" and you want it to say "Fruit". This article repeatedly refers to Apple and the IPad2, so I think the current headline is more than adequate and certainly not misleading.
Yet another complainer reaching to complain about anything they can grasp.
Learn how to edit pages and even create new ones.
#10
Posted 05 March 2011 - 06:20 AM
AgentF, on 04 March 2011 - 08:04 PM, said:
nonseq, on 04 March 2011 - 03:28 PM, said:
Why are you complaining? The point of headlines is to attract attention and get people to read the article. In addition, the title isn't misleading but more direct than your suggested headline. It's not like the article said "Apples" and was really about oranges. It said "Apples" and you want it to say "Fruit". This article repeatedly refers to Apple and the IPad2, so I think the current headline is more than adequate and certainly not misleading.
Yet another complainer reaching to complain about anything they can grasp.
It would be nice if the headline matched the article, which it did not. You and I will have to agree to have different standards or perspectives on what passes for "journalism" on the web. The blatant use of "Apple," "iPad", "iPhone", "killer", etc is an obvious attempt at grabbing eyeballs and in earlier times would be disdained as "yellow journalism", which may be a concept foreign to you. It would have been the beginnings of a good piece that would have served many. As it stands, the headline made in less useful and helpful.
I stand by my comment and would hope that PCW would ratchet up its standards for headlines instead of merely going for low hanging fruit.
#11
Posted 05 March 2011 - 07:03 AM
nonseq, on 05 March 2011 - 06:20 AM, said:
AgentF, on 04 March 2011 - 08:04 PM, said:
nonseq, on 04 March 2011 - 03:28 PM, said:
Why are you complaining? The point of headlines is to attract attention and get people to read the article. In addition, the title isn't misleading but more direct than your suggested headline. It's not like the article said "Apples" and was really about oranges. It said "Apples" and you want it to say "Fruit". This article repeatedly refers to Apple and the IPad2, so I think the current headline is more than adequate and certainly not misleading.
Yet another complainer reaching to complain about anything they can grasp.
It would be nice if the headline matched the article, which it did not. You and I will have to agree to have different standards or perspectives on what passes for "journalism" on the web. The blatant use of "Apple," "iPad", "iPhone", "killer", etc is an obvious attempt at grabbing eyeballs and in earlier times would be disdained as "yellow journalism", which may be a concept foreign to you. It would have been the beginnings of a good piece that would have served many. As it stands, the headline made in less useful and helpful.
I stand by my comment and would hope that PCW would ratchet up its standards for headlines instead of merely going for low hanging fruit.
I have to agree with your sentiment, if not necessarily your wording. The headline singles out iPad users while effectively ignoring all others, though they are equally or perhaps even more susceptible. Interestingly, had the headline said "Android Fans: Beware..." the response might have been even stronger.
Help













