Mystery Of The Missing Honeycomb Apps
#2
Posted 27 June 2011 - 06:16 PM
#3
Posted 27 June 2011 - 06:54 PM
Tablets apps are useless unless you have an app that needs the whole screen there is no point on forcing an app to take more space than it needs that is retarded and marketing ploy.
#4
Posted 27 June 2011 - 06:54 PM
Not true. I brought an Acer Iconia 500 with Honeycomb and probably 50% of the "android" or 2.x apps simply failed to load, crashed, or otherwise said it was the wrong OS.
Totally frustrating.
By comparison, 100% of my iPhone apps worked on the iPad2 that I brought home.
As a side note, I returned both tablets. The Acer because the screen grid lines drove me nuts and all the crashing (open facebook, google maps crashes, open a browser, facebook crashes).
I returned the Ipad2 because it was an expensive toy and I think I expected too much. If I went out for a break at work (or lunch or whatever) I had the choice of bringing my iPhone or iPad (or both of course) and realized after 2 days of leaving the iPad behind on my desk I realized it was an inconvenient toy.
#5
Posted 28 June 2011 - 01:00 AM
blamblam, on 27 June 2011 - 06:16 PM, said:
Would you have reacted the same way if this was an article pointing out something which is lacking in ios or idevices?
Just asking.
#6
Posted 28 June 2011 - 02:47 AM
There's no way developers would be able to profit developing for Android like they would iOS. Even the most successful developers mentioned there's no scalability between Androids phone and tablet software. Developers want consistency, so why waste your business model there.
#7
Posted 28 June 2011 - 02:50 AM
#8
Posted 28 June 2011 - 02:53 AM
#9
Posted 28 June 2011 - 12:56 PM
This sounds kinda funny to me because HP have built a unified dev framework for webOS called Enyo that allows scalability from scratch.
HP TouchPad will be launching with more native tablet apps than Android and the rate of production will be faster because each application port will scale. In addition, HP has serious and consistent worldwide distribution lined up and webOS coming to tens of millions of PCs and notebooks next year.
In this marathon, webOS has a good shot at the #2 position in the next 18-24 months, no matter what detractors say.
#10
Posted 29 June 2011 - 06:43 AM
dk3d, on 27 June 2011 - 06:54 PM, said:
Not true. I brought an Acer Iconia 500 with Honeycomb and probably 50% of the "android" or 2.x apps simply failed to load, crashed, or otherwise said it was the wrong OS.
Totally frustrating.
By comparison, 100% of my iPhone apps worked on the iPad2 that I brought home.
As a side note, I returned both tablets. The Acer because the screen grid lines drove me nuts and all the crashing (open facebook, google maps crashes, open a browser, facebook crashes).
I returned the Ipad2 because it was an expensive toy and I think I expected too much. If I went out for a break at work (or lunch or whatever) I had the choice of bringing my iPhone or iPad (or both of course) and realized after 2 days of leaving the iPad behind on my desk I realized it was an inconvenient toy.
You were believable until you felt you had to say the iPad2 was a toy-twice. Interesting as more than half are being bought by business and governments.
#11
Posted 29 June 2011 - 06:44 AM
abgenxi1vz, on 28 June 2011 - 12:56 PM, said:
This sounds kinda funny to me because HP have built a unified dev framework for webOS called Enyo that allows scalability from scratch.
HP TouchPad will be launching with more native tablet apps than Android and the rate of production will be faster because each application port will scale. In addition, HP has serious and consistent worldwide distribution lined up and webOS coming to tens of millions of PCs and notebooks next year.
In this marathon, webOS has a good shot at the #2 position in the next 18-24 months, no matter what detractors say.
I don't know if it will sell that well, but I'm rooting for it.
#12
Posted 29 June 2011 - 07:03 AM
#13
Posted 29 June 2011 - 07:38 AM
melgross, on 29 June 2011 - 06:43 AM, said:
dk3d, on 27 June 2011 - 06:54 PM, said:
Not true. I brought an Acer Iconia 500 with Honeycomb and probably 50% of the "android" or 2.x apps simply failed to load, crashed, or otherwise said it was the wrong OS.
Totally frustrating.
By comparison, 100% of my iPhone apps worked on the iPad2 that I brought home.
As a side note, I returned both tablets. The Acer because the screen grid lines drove me nuts and all the crashing (open facebook, google maps crashes, open a browser, facebook crashes).
I returned the Ipad2 because it was an expensive toy and I think I expected too much. If I went out for a break at work (or lunch or whatever) I had the choice of bringing my iPhone or iPad (or both of course) and realized after 2 days of leaving the iPad behind on my desk I realized it was an inconvenient toy.
You were believable until you felt you had to say the iPad2 was a toy-twice. Interesting as more than half are being bought by business and governments.
So someone's personal opinion isn't believable because they stated something you don't believe.
#14
Posted 29 June 2011 - 08:15 AM
DanielStutzmansexx, on 29 June 2011 - 07:38 AM, said:
melgross, on 29 June 2011 - 06:43 AM, said:
dk3d, on 27 June 2011 - 06:54 PM, said:
Not true. I brought an Acer Iconia 500 with Honeycomb and probably 50% of the "android" or 2.x apps simply failed to load, crashed, or otherwise said it was the wrong OS.
Totally frustrating.
By comparison, 100% of my iPhone apps worked on the iPad2 that I brought home.
As a side note, I returned both tablets. The Acer because the screen grid lines drove me nuts and all the crashing (open facebook, google maps crashes, open a browser, facebook crashes).
I returned the Ipad2 because it was an expensive toy and I think I expected too much. If I went out for a break at work (or lunch or whatever) I had the choice of bringing my iPhone or iPad (or both of course) and realized after 2 days of leaving the iPad behind on my desk I realized it was an inconvenient toy.
You were believable until you felt you had to say the iPad2 was a toy-twice. Interesting as more than half are being bought by business and governments.
So someone's personal opinion isn't believable because they stated something you don't believe.
Daniel aren't you making most of your income from those "toys?" Does that make you a toy maker? Perhaps the objection was the incipid "toy" comment.
#15
Posted 29 June 2011 - 08:57 AM
People use to sneer at Microsoft for pushing half-baked goods (Windows really wasn't usable until version 3.1). Ditto for Google.
And no, I am not an Apple fanboy. I sold my iPad (loved the pad itself but detested the iTunes synching).
#16
Posted 29 June 2011 - 10:03 AM
I think hardware manufacturers, afraid to admit how poorly they're doing against the iPad, are not coming forth with sales data, and maybe some developers are reluctant to spend time writing apps if no one's going to need them.
Personally, I don't think any single Android tablet is going to outsell the iPad any time soon, and I doubt if all of them together will. But I think there is still enough non-iPad market to sustain them all, so they should just let it be known how many they are selling. Maybe (just maybe) this will motivate the developers.
This post has been edited by Toulinwoek: 29 June 2011 - 10:05 AM
Help












