PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Lab Tested: Amd's "lynx" Brings Superior Graphics For Budget Desktops - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lab Tested: Amd's "lynx" Brings Superior Graphics For Budget Desktops

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,887
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 02 July 2011 - 01:01 PM

Post your comments for Lab Tested: AMD's "Lynx" Brings Superior Graphics For Budget Desktops here
0

#2 User is offline   GraysonPeddie 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 603
  • Joined: 28-July 06
  • Location:Orlando, FL 32825 USA

  Posted 02 July 2011 - 02:23 PM

Hmmm... I would like an AMD A8 4200 or something with an integrated Radeon HD 6650. I can dream, can I? :)

Perhaps I'll get that next year?
0

#3 User is offline   lamorpa 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 17-October 08

  Posted 06 July 2011 - 09:13 AM

What kind of number is 3,9066 in the 3D Mark Vantage table?
0

#4 User is offline   NateRalph5v97 

  • Newbie
  • Group: PC World Editorial
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 06-July 11

Posted 06 July 2011 - 10:27 AM

View Postlamorpa, on 06 July 2011 - 09:13 AM, said:

What kind of number is 3,9066 in the 3D Mark Vantage table?


Hey,

The actual score is 3,906, which is a real number. Typo fixed :)

As for your question: A score of 3906 is a middle of the road score -- which is expected, for integrated graphics on a gaming-focused test. The real point is showing how it outshines the Core i3-2100 under the same testing regimen. Alas, Futuremark doesn't make it especially easy to see where the results lie without running the test and submitting results immediately; You can find results for your own hardware for comparison's sake at 3dmark.com/search
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users