PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Driver: San Francisco Requires Permanent Internet Connection - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Driver: San Francisco Requires Permanent Internet Connection

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,894
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 27 July 2011 - 01:51 PM

Post your comments for Driver: San Francisco Requires Permanent Internet Connection here
0

#2 User is offline   oldschoolh4ck3r 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 880
  • Joined: 11-January 09

  Posted 28 July 2011 - 12:20 PM

They might have a chance at me buying their games if they'd ditch this online-only DRM nonsense. If the game is online like World of Warcraft, that's one thing - but this is just stupid.
---
Abort, Retry, Epic Fail? _
0

#3 User is offline   trollbob 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 28
  • Joined: 14-July 08

  Posted 28 July 2011 - 03:08 PM

Why would anyone buy a game with DRM like this?
0

#4 User is offline   crosswordbob 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,031
  • Joined: 25-June 10

Posted 28 July 2011 - 03:22 PM

Many years ago, in reaction to yet another claim that piracy was driving game prices upwards I hypothesised a game with "perfect" anti-piracy mechanisms. Would a game that's hard or impossible to pirate end up costing less, because the publishers were losing less to piracy? Or would the fact that legitimate copies no longer had to "compete" with pirate copies free the publishers to charge more? I think the answers starting to materialise...

Note: I'm not condoning piracy; I just wish it wasn't waved around as an excuse to shaft legitimate buyers.
If I dispute one single point in a post, that should not be taken as an indication that I agree/disagree with any other point made by that poster or anyone else in the thread. Or anywhere else. Ever.
0

#5 User is offline   waldojim 

  • Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 29-October 08
  • Location:Texas

Posted 28 July 2011 - 03:33 PM

I own laptops for a reason, that is to be portable. Portable means that I do not always have internet access. Add to this that some 30% or more of the US has no high speed internet access, and you can see quickly how these morons can alienate better than 30% of the buying market just in aggressive DRM like this. I voted with my dollar on every one of their titles. Flat refusing to buy them. I don't care if the game is available for my XBOX. I don't care what their excuse is. They want to restrict people this way, fine. I don't need your game.

To this day, the only DRM I can stand is STEAM. Because I can easily tell it to stay offline when I decide to go places, and I don't ever need a disc.
"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" -- Isaac Asimov
Spoiler
0

#6 User is offline   Karlokf3v 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 28-July 11

  Posted 28 July 2011 - 11:59 PM

hey ,crosswordbob , they have pirated world of warcraft, they will pwn this driver game if they want
0

#7 User is offline   crosswordbob 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,031
  • Joined: 25-June 10

Posted 29 July 2011 - 02:38 AM

View PostKarlokf3v, on 28 July 2011 - 11:59 PM, said:

hey ,crosswordbob , they have pirated world of warcraft, they will pwn this driver game if they want


I'm sure they will - that's why I use the word "hypothesised"
If I dispute one single point in a post, that should not be taken as an indication that I agree/disagree with any other point made by that poster or anyone else in the thread. Or anywhere else. Ever.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users