Dell Precision M6600 Mobile Workstation: Businesslike And Capable
#1
Posted 19 September 2011 - 01:01 PM
#3
Posted 20 September 2011 - 03:08 PM
#5
Posted 21 January 2012 - 09:52 AM
#6
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:21 AM
Kadidelhopper, on 21 January 2012 - 09:52 AM, said:
Haaaa...In each single review of mobile WS I can find the same kind of comment. Honestly, each of them. With, sometimes, the insulting add on: "use your head people". So, because tonight I'm a bit fed up with these idiotic comments, I'll tell you why. I'm used to build my workstations. Much more powerful. Much cheaper. Yes, you can have a much more powerful desktop for a fraction of the price. Yes, you can have a "good" laptop for a fraction of the price. BUT, some people need A MOBILE WORKSTATION.
If at time of your career you reach a level where you will have to work in 3 different countries each week (and I wish you reach it), swapping from an office to another, each of them with different hardware quality, because one is in Sweden and established for decades, the other in China and growing, the third in Africa and starting up, and if at the same time you have to deliver with a consistent level of speed and quality, then you need a mobile workstation.
If you think that you can carry a desktop from place to place easily, you're wrong. I did it. Is it feasible? Yes. Is it convenient? No. Not at all. Believe me, carrying a heavy, large "brick" with a screen and a battery is nothing compared to walking/driving around with a full tower desktop.
If you think that you can be productive with a "good" laptop, then it means that we have a different definition of the term "productive" or that your work is not that demanding in term of hardware raw power.
This is why these laptops are called "mobile workstations". They just try to reach desktop specs without having to carry a 1m3 crate. If you can't see how useful they can be, it means you don't need them. If you don't need them, you don't know how valuable they are, so please don't feel like you really have to leave a comment.
#7
Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:08 AM
Leiurus, on 26 January 2012 - 08:21 AM, said:
Kadidelhopper, on 21 January 2012 - 09:52 AM, said:
Haaaa...In each single review of mobile WS I can find the same kind of comment. Honestly, each of them. With, sometimes, the insulting add on: "use your head people". So, because tonight I'm a bit fed up with these idiotic comments, I'll tell you why. I'm used to build my workstations. Much more powerful. Much cheaper. Yes, you can have a much more powerful desktop for a fraction of the price. Yes, you can have a "good" laptop for a fraction of the price. BUT, some people need A MOBILE WORKSTATION.
If at time of your career you reach a level where you will have to work in 3 different countries each week (and I wish you reach it), swapping from an office to another, each of them with different hardware quality, because one is in Sweden and established for decades, the other in China and growing, the third in Africa and starting up, and if at the same time you have to deliver with a consistent level of speed and quality, then you need a mobile workstation.
If you think that you can carry a desktop from place to place easily, you're wrong. I did it. Is it feasible? Yes. Is it convenient? No. Not at all. Believe me, carrying a heavy, large "brick" with a screen and a battery is nothing compared to walking/driving around with a full tower desktop.
If you think that you can be productive with a "good" laptop, then it means that we have a different definition of the term "productive" or that your work is not that demanding in term of hardware raw power.
This is why these laptops are called "mobile workstations". They just try to reach desktop specs without having to carry a 1m3 crate. If you can't see how useful they can be, it means you don't need them. If you don't need them, you don't know how valuable they are, so please don't feel like you really have to leave a comment.
Well said Leiurus, mobile workstation is not for everyone; it has its niche in the market that nothing else will suffice!
Business-wise, not all companies would provide contractors the kind of hardware up to your liking (not in different countries such as your case, even across town here!)
Not to mention, custom setting is essential to one's work flow and speed; as graphic artist, I wouldn't want to lug around my PC to places for work and presentations.
Besides its capabilities and convenience, one needs serious tool to get better result thus helps build one's professional reputation. I am a happy owner of a M6400 for sometimes now and I'm thinking of upgrading to the M6600
This post has been edited by sit2700: 16 February 2012 - 11:18 AM
#8
Posted 25 April 2012 - 03:50 AM
Kadidelhopper, on 21 January 2012 - 09:52 AM, said:
On a professional work station the software costs mount up, and they usually are specific to a CPU. One desktop and one laptop means two licenses. Check out the prices for Adobe Creative Suites, for example. For proprietary software does one really want the hassle of discovering, in the field, that a program that worked just fine on the office workstation doesn't quite behave the same way on a laptop?
One of the reasons for the high cost is that the demand for such equipment is less. If production volumes went up prices would come down, but that is not going to happen.
#9
Posted 29 April 2012 - 09:40 AM
#10
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:03 AM
#11
Posted 21 October 2012 - 01:34 PM
Quote
Have you ever heard of a mouse?
Do you even begin to consider that ANY mouse is better than ANY trackpad?
#12
Posted 21 October 2012 - 04:07 PM
Quote
Maybe because you want your powperful system and all your work to be portable? Do you visit clients?
#13
Posted 22 December 2012 - 10:10 AM
#14
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:12 PM
There are logical reasons otherwise there would not be so many buying
them.
I throw back your own question, why would anyone want two computers
when one will serve just fine?
Answer: Full power when you need it, wherever.
Help












