Help
Post your comments for 5 Apps Banned from Apple's App Store in 2011 here
5 Apps Banned From Apple's App Store In 2011
#5
VijayArunkumar 
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 10:52 AM
mjosephh, on 13 December 2011 - 10:07 AM, said:
dsuden, on 13 December 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
"Who would of guessed"
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
You should do everyone a favor and never comment, or speak.
I can understand your need for a more substantive comment relevant to the article's content.
But, this is PCWorld, and not some wannabe amateur journalist's blog. There is a quality of writing that we expect as readers, and that is just lousy journalism. I was reading through the article... until I saw "would of," and began to wonder why I was reading some lousy writer's rant. Basically, it discredited the author in my mind, and the article along with it. Dsuden was doing a service by pointing out his mistake, so he could correct it and write better articles in the future, that don't have such distractions. You on the other hand, haven't (ofn't?) contributed much to the discussion, other than demonstrate to us on how to be a douche on the internet.
#6
PatrickRighton
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 11:27 AM
VijayArunkumar, on 13 December 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:
mjosephh, on 13 December 2011 - 10:07 AM, said:
dsuden, on 13 December 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
"Who would of guessed"
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
You should do everyone a favor and never comment, or speak.
I can understand your need for a more substantive comment relevant to the article's content.
But, this is PCWorld, and not some wannabe amateur journalist's blog. There is a quality of writing that we expect as readers, and that is just lousy journalism. I was reading through the article... until I saw "would of," and began to wonder why I was reading some lousy writer's rant. Basically, it discredited the author in my mind, and the article along with it. Dsuden was doing a service by pointing out his mistake, so he could correct it and write better articles in the future, that don't have such distractions. You on the other hand, haven't (ofn't?) contributed much to the discussion, other than demonstrate to us on how to be a douche on the internet.
Agree with Vjay - Mjoseph you're a douche
#7
MarkDomingues
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 11:48 AM
thanks for nthe warnings
#8
DrejXArmy
- Full Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 30-September 10
Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:07 PM
PatrickRighton, on 13 December 2011 - 11:27 AM, said:
VijayArunkumar, on 13 December 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:
mjosephh, on 13 December 2011 - 10:07 AM, said:
dsuden, on 13 December 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
"Who would of guessed"
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
You should do everyone a favor and never comment, or speak.
I can understand your need for a more substantive comment relevant to the article's content.
But, this is PCWorld, and not some wannabe amateur journalist's blog. There is a quality of writing that we expect as readers, and that is just lousy journalism. I was reading through the article... until I saw "would of," and began to wonder why I was reading some lousy writer's rant. Basically, it discredited the author in my mind, and the article along with it. Dsuden was doing a service by pointing out his mistake, so he could correct it and write better articles in the future, that don't have such distractions. You on the other hand, haven't (ofn't?) contributed much to the discussion, other than demonstrate to us on how to be a douche on the internet.
Agree with Vjay - Mjoseph you're a douche
Who would of guessed that you idiots would make a point to just post. All 3 of you are douche bags, HA, who would of guessed, right?
FYI - This is a tech website not a english website and if you think you can do it better, then do it, if not, shut it.....Article was posted correctly and was to the point, if you need correct english to live with yourself, then you got more issues then this one line....
#9
DanCas2
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 05-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:07 PM
so it's not just big government who decides what you may or may not have access vs parental controls that any untech parent be able to use and adults see/do what they wish to! Glad I have Android! :-)
#10
GrimGalore
- Member
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 11-July 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:09 PM
mjosephh, on 13 December 2011 - 10:07 AM, said:
dsuden, on 13 December 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
"Who would of guessed"
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
You should do everyone a favor and never comment, or speak.
I agree! Stop correcting people's grammar and respect the rights of individuals to make posts that make themselves sound like uneducated illiterate hicks.
#11
Jungscott
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:29 PM
DrejXArmy, on 13 December 2011 - 12:07 PM, said:
PatrickRighton, on 13 December 2011 - 11:27 AM, said:
VijayArunkumar, on 13 December 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:
mjosephh, on 13 December 2011 - 10:07 AM, said:
dsuden, on 13 December 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
"Who would of guessed"
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
You should do everyone a favor and never comment, or speak.
I can understand your need for a more substantive comment relevant to the article's content.
But, this is PCWorld, and not some wannabe amateur journalist's blog. There is a quality of writing that we expect as readers, and that is just lousy journalism. I was reading through the article... until I saw "would of," and began to wonder why I was reading some lousy writer's rant. Basically, it discredited the author in my mind, and the article along with it. Dsuden was doing a service by pointing out his mistake, so he could correct it and write better articles in the future, that don't have such distractions. You on the other hand, haven't (ofn't?) contributed much to the discussion, other than demonstrate to us on how to be a douche on the internet.
Agree with Vjay - Mjoseph you're a douche
Who would of guessed that you idiots would make a point to just post. All 3 of you are douche bags, HA, who would of guessed, right?
FYI - This is a tech website not a english website and if you think you can do it better, then do it, if not, shut it.....Article was posted correctly and was to the point, if you need correct english to live with yourself, then you got more issues then this one line....
...THAN this one line...
#12
dsuden
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 19-June 08
Posted 13 December 2011 - 01:31 PM
VijayArunkumar, on 13 December 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:
mjosephh, on 13 December 2011 - 10:07 AM, said:
dsuden, on 13 December 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
"Who would of guessed"
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
You should do everyone a favor and never comment, or speak.
But, this is PCWorld, and not some wannabe amateur journalist's blog. There is a quality of writing that we expect as readers, and that is just lousy journalism. I was reading through the article... until I saw "would of," and began to wonder why I was reading some lousy writer's rant. Basically, it discredited the author in my mind, and the article along with it. Dsuden was doing a service by pointing out his mistake, so he could correct it and write better articles in the future, that don't have such distractions. You on the other hand, haven't (ofn't?) contributed much to the discussion, other than demonstrate to us on how to be a douche on the internet.
You nailed it. This isn't a little amateur blog (or at least, it's not supposed to be). It's a professional publication with a long history of computer coverage. Expectations have to be that the staff of writers (and their editors) pay attention to things like this. When they don't, I think it's a courtesy to point it out in a nice way.
This post has been edited by dsuden: 13 December 2011 - 01:34 PM
#13
TeddyRupskin
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 02:07 PM
DanCas2, on 13 December 2011 - 12:07 PM, said:
so it's not just big government who decides what you may or may not have access vs parental controls that any untech parent be able to use and adults see/do what they wish to! Glad I have Android! :-)
Why is it that Android users think they know the most about tech and in reality end up knowing the least? And Y U SO SMUG? Google just pulled 22 apps from their app store:
http://arstechnica.c...tm_campaign=rss
#14
TrevorBG
- Newbie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 24-September 08
Posted 13 December 2011 - 02:30 PM
PatrickRighton, on 13 December 2011 - 11:27 AM, said:
VijayArunkumar, on 13 December 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:
mjosephh, on 13 December 2011 - 10:07 AM, said:
dsuden, on 13 December 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
"Who would of guessed"
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
I think you meant to say, "who would have guessed."
You should do everyone a favor and never comment, or speak.
I can understand your need for a more substantive comment relevant to the article's content.
But, this is PCWorld, and not some wannabe amateur journalist's blog. There is a quality of writing that we expect as readers, and that is just lousy journalism. I was reading through the article... until I saw "would of," and began to wonder why I was reading some lousy writer's rant. Basically, it discredited the author in my mind, and the article along with it. Dsuden was doing a service by pointing out his mistake, so he could correct it and write better articles in the future, that don't have such distractions. You on the other hand, haven't (ofn't?) contributed much to the discussion, other than demonstrate to us on how to be a douche on the internet.
Agree with Vjay - Mjoseph you're a douche
No Patty... you're the douche.
You'd know that if you'd visited a mirror recently.
#15
NewTeKnology
- Full Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 02-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 02:56 PM
OK first off only grammar geeks care about grammar outside of work or school so you all arguing over this is a flat out waste of time. If these guys wanna show they never had a social life, it's their business.
Secondly I am also against the fact Apple yanks any app that makes them look bad because it makes Apple look bad. It's telling people if you don't kiss our ass, and make us look like the best thing in the world, then you're products built for our devices will be rejected or removed.
Secondly I am also against the fact Apple yanks any app that makes them look bad because it makes Apple look bad. It's telling people if you don't kiss our ass, and make us look like the best thing in the world, then you're products built for our devices will be rejected or removed.
#16
AndrewInAustin
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 03:12 PM
This is why I have an Android. Having a an Apple is restrictive. No fun.
#17
GrammarGeek
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 03:17 PM
NewTeKnology, on 13 December 2011 - 02:56 PM, said:
OK first off only grammar geeks care about grammar outside of work or school so you all arguing over this is a flat out waste of time. If these guys wanna show they never had a social life, it's their business.
Secondly I am also against the fact Apple yanks any app that makes them look bad because it makes Apple look bad. It's telling people if you don't kiss our ass, and make us look like the best thing in the world, then you're products built for our devices will be rejected or removed.
Secondly I am also against the fact Apple yanks any app that makes them look bad because it makes Apple look bad. It's telling people if you don't kiss our ass, and make us look like the best thing in the world, then you're products built for our devices will be rejected or removed.
wanna = "want to"
you're = your
#18
rst3
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 03:25 PM
TeddyRupskin, on 13 December 2011 - 02:07 PM, said:
DanCas2, on 13 December 2011 - 12:07 PM, said:
so it's not just big government who decides what you may or may not have access vs parental controls that any untech parent be able to use and adults see/do what they wish to! Glad I have Android! :-)
Why is it that Android users think they know the most about tech and in reality end up knowing the least? And Y U SO SMUG? Google just pulled 22 apps from their app store:
http://arstechnica.c...tm_campaign=rss
did you even read the heading for the page you listed... they Removed the Apps from google because they were malicious, trying to steal money...
your obviously trying to justify continueing to use Apple products when you know they're stiffleing your freedom
Have a nice day
This post has been edited by bcappel: 13 December 2011 - 03:28 PM
#19
primetech
- Newbie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 18-July 09
Posted 13 December 2011 - 05:08 PM
Here in this PCWorld comment section, trolls attack grammar Nazis. You guys should learn the Internet is a place where people hate just because they can!
As to Apple: Shame on you. Almost every Android phone (except those peculiar AT&T models) can install any app from any marketplace, unresticted. This means that Google isn't forcing people to believe their politics, or their ethics -- just that they're trying to keep their personal store somewhat clean.
Do a search for "apk" on Google.com itself and you'll find dozens of other sources for content. This is what free speech is about.
As to Apple: Shame on you. Almost every Android phone (except those peculiar AT&T models) can install any app from any marketplace, unresticted. This means that Google isn't forcing people to believe their politics, or their ethics -- just that they're trying to keep their personal store somewhat clean.
Do a search for "apk" on Google.com itself and you'll find dozens of other sources for content. This is what free speech is about.
#20
tuffgong
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13-December 11
Posted 13 December 2011 - 05:09 PM
So the use of contractions is verboten in writing??? Wanna is a contraction of "Want To" http://www.thefreedi...nary.com/wanna. Get a life...
wanna = "want to"
you're = your
GrammarGeek, on 13 December 2011 - 03:17 PM, said:
NewTeKnology, on 13 December 2011 - 02:56 PM, said:
OK first off only grammar geeks care about grammar outside of work or school so you all arguing over this is a flat out waste of time. If these guys wanna show they never had a social life, it's their business.
Secondly I am also against the fact Apple yanks any app that makes them look bad because it makes Apple look bad. It's telling people if you don't kiss our ass, and make us look like the best thing in the world, then you're products built for our devices will be rejected or removed.
Secondly I am also against the fact Apple yanks any app that makes them look bad because it makes Apple look bad. It's telling people if you don't kiss our ass, and make us look like the best thing in the world, then you're products built for our devices will be rejected or removed.
wanna = "want to"
you're = your
