Post your comments for AMD's Ultrathin Set to Undercut Intel Ultrabooks by $200 here
Page 1 of 1
Amd's Ultrathin Set To Undercut Intel Ultrabooks By $200
#2
Posted 17 January 2012 - 12:04 PM
Good for AMD. I need to purchase some new laptop computers so hopefully I can try one out later this year.
#4
Posted 17 January 2012 - 04:52 PM
Ultrabooks are ridiculously expensive. PC makers are too greedy... if they lower the price almost entire market would become ultrabooks.
The A-series pales in comparison to i-series, though.
The A-series pales in comparison to i-series, though.
#5
Posted 17 January 2012 - 04:56 PM
Presumably, these will have i3 like performance, but great integrated graphics (compared to Intel), right? For the average guy who just wants to surf the web and maybe play a game, this looks like a pretty good option. After all, AMD has a better option than Intel when it comes to netbooks (the E350).
Spoiler
"The Internet will be used for all kinds of spurious things, including fake quotes from smart people." -Albert EinsteinNeed a Windows ISO image?
#6
Posted 23 January 2012 - 09:53 AM
I find this hard to believe considering the smallest A series laptop was 14 inches. How are they going to go from that to 13 inch ultrathin. Also, the Trinity chip they are planning to do this with is based on the same architecture as their bulldozer chip, which failed miserably in performance.
I agree that the performance should be enough for most people, but then again i am worried that certain applications will run slow enough that AMD will look really bad next to intel
I agree that the performance should be enough for most people, but then again i am worried that certain applications will run slow enough that AMD will look really bad next to intel
#7
Posted 31 January 2012 - 01:07 AM
KyleCross, on 23 January 2012 - 09:53 AM, said:
I find this hard to believe considering the smallest A series laptop was 14 inches. How are they going to go from that to 13 inch ultrathin. Also, the Trinity chip they are planning to do this with is based on the same architecture as their bulldozer chip, which failed miserably in performance.
I agree that the performance should be enough for most people, but then again i am worried that certain applications will run slow enough that AMD will look really bad next to intel
I agree that the performance should be enough for most people, but then again i am worried that certain applications will run slow enough that AMD will look really bad next to intel
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=lsmTDb-Mlws
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
Help












