Page 1 of 1
Wikileaks Founder To Run For Australian Senate
#1
Posted 18 March 2012 - 08:28 AM
Post your comments for WikiLeaks Founder to Run for Australian Senate here
#2
Posted 18 March 2012 - 02:21 PM
The last thing the BigGov/BigBiz/BigRelig fascist pigs of the world want is for the truth to be commonly known. However the Christ said that we can not be truly free without the truth. It is time for a 1776 revolution worldwide!
#3
Posted 18 March 2012 - 05:16 PM
It would be great if, three or four days before the election, WikiLeaks published all of the Assange campaign's internal phone messages and email strategy memos. Surely voters--and nosy people everywhere--have a right to know these things.
#5
Posted 18 March 2012 - 05:47 PM
DEHos, on 18 March 2012 - 02:21 PM, said:
The last thing the BigGov/BigBiz/BigRelig fascist pigs of the world want is for the truth to be commonly known. However the Christ said that we can not be truly free without the truth. It is time for a 1776 revolution worldwide!
Julian Assange didn't publish truth as I see it. And Christ would not have said that those hurt and killed (Afghani innocents) by unvetted and capricious release the information are "Collateral Damage." Not one positive change came from Assange's releases. However, I suspect that he does have a Messiah complex. It's frightening to read comments from those who don't dig deeper into the claims of Wikileaks.
#6
Posted 18 March 2012 - 08:28 PM
Yargs, on 18 March 2012 - 05:16 PM, said:
It would be great if, three or four days before the election, WikiLeaks published all of the Assange campaign's internal phone messages and email strategy memos. Surely voters--and nosy people everywhere--have a right to know these things.
I'm sure that he wouldn't have it any other way.
#7
Posted 18 March 2012 - 09:22 PM
Yargs, on 18 March 2012 - 05:16 PM, said:
It would be great if, three or four days before the election, WikiLeaks published all of the Assange campaign's internal phone messages and email strategy memos. Surely voters--and nosy people everywhere--have a right to know these things.
Surely one of Assange's character would voluntarily disclose such, would he not?
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
#9
Posted 19 March 2012 - 01:17 AM
Also what is this business of PC world's terms when linking a Facebook account that i need to give permission for PCworld to post on my behalf? Why on earth would you want to pretend to be me? You guys will be going to court if i find you posted on my behalf. That's mis-representation.
#10
Posted 19 March 2012 - 03:35 PM
Quote
Also what is this business of PC world's terms when linking a Facebook account that i need to give permission for PCworld to post on my behalf? Why on earth would you want to pretend to be me? You guys will be going to court if i find you posted on my behalf. That's mis-representation.
When you post to FB via PCW, you are not directly communicating with FB; it is PCW which does that. The PCW ToS simply says that you authorize PCW to be your agent for the purpose of passing your words on to FB.
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
Help














