Playstation 4 Is Code-named 'orbis,' May Restrict Second-hand Games
#1
Posted 29 March 2012 - 06:49 AM
#2
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:04 AM
#3
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:13 AM
as far as this 4096x2160 thing, well.. even if sony supported that display resolution, it would probably be one of those features that gets dropped pretty soon after, or even before the release of the console (like 2 HDMI ports on the PS3, or ps2 backwards compatibilty.. etc.). The market for that kind of resolution is so tiny that no developer would waste their resources developing for it. not to mention, 1080p is enough for most people.. so of course, this is all taken with a boatload of salt.
#4
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:29 AM
#5
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:32 AM
"Nothing to see here.. Move along."
#6
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:32 AM
"Nothing to see here.. Move along."
#7
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:47 AM
#8
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:49 AM
What about users who would rather not connect their console to the internet? Screw them?
#10
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:06 AM
And Microsoft's XBOX 720 (codename: Sit & Spin) will certainly do exactly the same things, since Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo are being RAPED by GameStop, Amazon, BlockBuster, etc. Everybody 'renting' and 'trading in' and 'sharing' games.
They're all moving towards downloaded content (ala 'iTunes'). and that's a good thing.
If you can get a $5 'trial' disk from the store, or order it, and pay online to 'activate' it, or if you want to (or just tell the console to download it overnight, or 'this week', for really big games), people will do it.
And if the COST PER GAME goes down (since in a download system, costs to get it onto 'shelves' go away, and games no longer have a 'shelf life' before all of the stores that 'exchange' games begin stealing all of the profits (GameStop is appropriately named), there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to 'buy' your new games for $40, perhaps even $20, instead of $60.
If Sony is really smart, they'll start building their 'PS4' right into their TV sets. Why have a wussy little embedded system?
#11
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:07 AM
#12
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:19 AM
Johnny33cc, on 29 March 2012 - 07:47 AM, said:
From the article:
"Microsoft currently plans to lock down the Metro-style interface on Windows 8 PCs by restricting Metro-style apps to the company's own app store. ... At this point, however, Microsoft is going farther than Apple when it comes to PC lockdown."
#13
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:28 AM
TerrenceNewton2zgr, on 29 March 2012 - 07:13 AM, said:
as far as this 4096x2160 thing, well.. even if sony supported that display resolution, it would probably be one of those features that gets dropped pretty soon after, or even before the release of the console (like 2 HDMI ports on the PS3, or ps2 backwards compatibilty.. etc.). The market for that kind of resolution is so tiny that no developer would waste their resources developing for it. not to mention, 1080p is enough for most people.. so of course, this is all taken with a boatload of salt.
The only way it will be accepted is if it's shoved down our throats, and new legislation is passed because it was ruled that you are allowed to "jailbreak" your hardware, or put whatever software you want on it as long as the software is not illegal. The 4k res thing is the next big thing, and just remember what people were saying about the difference between 720 and 1080? People who have seen the new displays say there is a noticeable difference, and you need that res to display passive 1080p3D. As for developers wasting their resources, it's not much at all. If you play computer games, notice the long list of resolutions to choose from (most games.) You can go back and play a direct3d game from 1996 and play them at whatever resolution your system supports, even if that resolution wasn't even dreamed of being used back then. After 4k res it will double again in another decade or so, and even if you don't notice the difference right away, in a few years many people will say how pixelated "that 1080p" looks especially as TV's get bigger.
Sadly if the corporate fascism continues on the way it has been going it looks like we will no longer be renting or buying used games. The only way it won't is to vote with your wallet, and refuse to buy under the "new" model of business. Believe me, if people didn't already shy away from this type of business model we would already have said goodbye to used/rented games. They won't do it if they are making less money. So even if it starts out that way with the new system, if not enough people "buy" into it, it will quickly change. We'll have to wait and see what the consumer will put up with.
#14
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:29 AM
NikoStanford, on 29 March 2012 - 07:29 AM, said:
You may want to take a look at the most recent Xbox news, as they are going to be doing the same thing...
#15
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:34 AM
#16
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:34 AM
#17
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:42 AM
#18
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:45 AM
#19
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:48 AM
No more lending a game to a friend when I beat it, no more bringing my games to my friends house.
I'm just really over all this, it's just become such a headache & a stomach ache; they have lost sight of the true nature that is gaming.
#21
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:53 AM
Help












