[KLanD]

42n81, on 25 April 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:

KLanD, on 25 April 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:

42n81, on 24 April 2012 - 01:27 PM, said:

Once more, what part of :

"I know that the commenters on these forums repeating Apple's claims do so to discredit Apple and its user base but what people remember is that Apple haters don't like Apple users and that Apple haters think Apple computers get viruses."

do you have difficulty with?

The answer to you question is right there.

"Apple haters think Apple computers get viruses"

Once more, do you agree with this or are you implying they don't.

I totally agree with that statement (especially since I wrote it originally).

Even out of context I agree with it.

So in other words, you agree with the supposed "haters". If you agree, then why call then haters?

[42n81]

KLanD, on 25 April 2012 - 07:39 PM, said:

42n81, on 25 April 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:

KLanD, on 25 April 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:

42n81, on 24 April 2012 - 01:27 PM, said:

Once more, what part of :

"I know that the commenters on these forums repeating Apple's claims do so to discredit Apple and its user base but what people remember is that Apple haters don't like Apple users and that Apple haters think Apple computers get viruses."

do you have difficulty with?

The answer to you question is right there.

"Apple haters think Apple computers get viruses"

Once more, do you agree with this or are you implying they don't.

I totally agree with that statement (especially since I wrote it originally).

Even out of context I agree with it.

So in other words, you agree with the supposed "haters". If you agree, then why call then haters?

No. I said I agree with the statement.

You asked me if I agreed with the statement or whether I was implying they [Apple haters] don't [think Apple computers get viruses].

I answered your question.

[KLanD]

42n81, on 26 April 2012 - 01:04 PM, said:

KLanD, on 25 April 2012 - 07:39 PM, said:

42n81, on 25 April 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:

KLanD, on 25 April 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:

42n81, on 24 April 2012 - 01:27 PM, said:

Once more, what part of :

"I know that the commenters on these forums repeating Apple's claims do so to discredit Apple and its user base but what people remember is that Apple haters don't like Apple users and that Apple haters think Apple computers get viruses."

do you have difficulty with?

The answer to you question is right there.

"Apple haters think Apple computers get viruses"

Once more, do you agree with this or are you implying they don't.

I totally agree with that statement (especially since I wrote it originally).

Even out of context I agree with it.

So in other words, you agree with the supposed "haters". If you agree, then why call then haters?

No. I said I agree with the statement.

You asked me if I agreed with the statement or whether I was implying they [Apple haters] don't [think Apple computers get viruses].

I answered your question.

I wasn't asking that and you know it.

So you don't believe Apple computers can get virus' then.

[42n81]

KLanD, on 27 April 2012 - 05:13 AM, said:

42n81, on 26 April 2012 - 01:04 PM, said:

KLanD, on 25 April 2012 - 07:39 PM, said:

42n81, on 25 April 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:

KLanD, on 25 April 2012 - 02:01 PM, said:

"Apple haters think Apple computers get viruses"

Once more, do you agree with this or are you implying they don't.

I totally agree with that statement (especially since I wrote it originally).

Even out of context I agree with it.

So in other words, you agree with the supposed "haters". If you agree, then why call then haters?

No. I said I agree with the statement.

You asked me if I agreed with the statement or whether I was implying they [Apple haters] don't [think Apple computers get viruses].

I answered your question.

I wasn't asking that and you know it.^[1]

So you don't believe Apple computers can get virus' then.^[2]

• Then formulate your questions accordingly. It's not my job to decipher your question and figure out what you're "really" asking.
  
  
• Again, that's not a question but a statement based on your incorrect interpretation of my comments. I stated my position a long time ago when I said:

• "I don't care if you use stone tablets, papyrus, smoke signals, encrypted voice communication, a Commodore 64 or live under a rock. The moment you have something someone else wants to get their hands on without your agreement you're at risk. Security hardened infrastructures have been hacked."

.

[KLanD]

42n81, on 27 April 2012 - 06:05 AM, said:

• Then formulate your questions accordingly. It's not my job to decipher your question and figure out what you're "really" asking.
  
  
• Again, that's not a question but a statement based on your incorrect interpretation of my comments. I stated my position a long time ago when I said:

• "I don't care if you use stone tablets, papyrus, smoke signals, encrypted voice communication, a Commodore 64 or live under a rock. The moment you have something someone else wants to get their hands on without your agreement you're at risk. Security hardened infrastructures have been hacked."

.

Honestly, I don't know how to formulate a question any simpler for you.

So again, you agree with the apparent "haters".