Internet2k4, on 09 April 2012 - 04:51 AM, said:
Windows 3.1: Twenty Years Later
#22
Posted 09 April 2012 - 10:17 AM
#23
Posted 09 April 2012 - 10:18 AM
#24
Posted 09 April 2012 - 10:22 AM
Hotelguy, on 09 April 2012 - 10:17 AM, said:
crd.cardfile what a great apps. I had over 1,200 names stored. Does NOT work with Windows7. However, goto: http://www.azzcardfile.com/ and it will convert all your crd.cardfile. Good luck.
This post has been edited by Hotelguy: 09 April 2012 - 10:23 AM
#25
Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:38 AM
Ah the good old days of "abort, retry fail."
#26
Posted 09 April 2012 - 12:21 PM
Sarah Jacobsson Purewal, on 09 April 2012 - 04:31 AM, said:
Thanks for making me feel old! My first Windows was 1.01. I ran that on my Kaypro 8088 with all 768k ram, and 20MB of hard drive space... I thought that was the cats meow at the time.
#27
Posted 09 April 2012 - 12:28 PM
#28
Posted 09 April 2012 - 12:53 PM
#29
Posted 09 April 2012 - 01:21 PM
waldojim, on 09 April 2012 - 12:21 PM, said:
Sarah Jacobsson Purewal, on 09 April 2012 - 04:31 AM, said:
Thanks for making me feel old! My first Windows was 1.01. I ran that on my Kaypro 8088 with all 768k ram, and 20MB of hard drive space... I thought that was the cats meow at the time.
My first was DOS! Now that really makes me feel old!
#30
Posted 09 April 2012 - 01:59 PM
#32
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:32 PM
waldojim, on 09 April 2012 - 12:21 PM, said:
Sarah Jacobsson Purewal, on 09 April 2012 - 04:31 AM, said:
Thanks for making me feel old! My first Windows was 1.01. I ran that on my Kaypro 8088 with all 768k ram, and 20MB of hard drive space... I thought that was the cats meow at the time.
I ran DOS on. Panasonic Senior Partner, with..TaDa...2 floppie drives and 256k RAM. That thing was "luggable". I think it weighed 34 pounds.
But it did have a built in printer, heat sensitive paper.
This post has been edited by GypsyJon: 09 April 2012 - 04:33 PM
#33
Posted 09 April 2012 - 05:40 PM
Yes, Win 3.1 did have a registry - it's just that few programs made much use of it.
#36
Posted 09 April 2012 - 08:11 PM
Boletusedulis, on 09 April 2012 - 08:58 AM, said:
And everything MS has done to "simplify" file management since then has only created more confusion. "My Documents," "My Computer," "Documents and Settings," etc, etc only served to confuse the directory structure.
If they stuck with File Manager and forced people to learn the basic directory structure of their PCs, a world of idiocy could have been avoided.
Agreed... and the idiocy of having to click on the Start button in order to get to Shut Down lol. Ironically enough, a poster elsewhere called that Windows Explorer thing brilliant, and that Mac was 'a** backwards.' I wonder what he'd say about Microsoft's attempts to simplify and streamline the UI like OS X. In that regard, I think Windows users often equate OS X's simple, clean, streamlined UI with an absence of depth, capability, and functionality. Mac users see it as stripping away the extraneous and getting right to the point. As a humorous example of just what is necessary, in the 'less-is-more' sense, a famous sculptor, when asked how he would sculpt an elephant, replied 'I would get a block of granite and a chisel, and remove that which is not an elephant.'
Sorry mods.. a little off topic.. now duck as the haters weigh in lol
This post has been edited by artzy65: 09 April 2012 - 08:30 PM
#37
Posted 09 April 2012 - 10:41 PM
#38
Posted 10 April 2012 - 02:47 AM
Boletusedulis, on 09 April 2012 - 08:58 AM, said:
And everything MS has done to "simplify" file management since then has only created more confusion. "My Documents," "My Computer," "Documents and Settings," etc, etc only served to confuse the directory structure.
If they stuck with File Manager and forced people to learn the basic directory structure of their PCs, a world of idiocy could have been avoided.
Since you have been the first I've seen to actually put this to words, YES, I agree with your contentions.
#39
Posted 10 April 2012 - 03:43 AM
LOCASTE, on 10 April 2012 - 02:47 AM, said:
Boletusedulis, on 09 April 2012 - 08:58 AM, said:
And everything MS has done to "simplify" file management since then has only created more confusion. "My Documents," "My Computer," "Documents and Settings," etc, etc only served to confuse the directory structure.
If they stuck with File Manager and forced people to learn the basic directory structure of their PCs, a world of idiocy could have been avoided.
Since you have been the first I've seen to actually put this to words, YES, I agree with your contentions.
This would have been easier to "force" if M$ had stuck with MS-DOS and never released Windows. GUI's appeal most to those who don't want to be forced to learn more than they absolutely have to about their hardware.
I'd be just fine if the majority of software released was compatible with DOS. I wish it were - it'd run faster and require less hardware. That GUI driven machines can even begin to play games in real time is a testament to the advances in hardware.
#40
Posted 10 April 2012 - 05:06 AM
Cathlin, on 09 April 2012 - 07:22 AM, said:
Agree you should have a look at AZZ Cardfile as someone above suggests - fancier and more resource demanding but even more flexible. I think it still imports the old .crd files.
This post has been edited by Internet2k4: 10 April 2012 - 05:07 AM
Help












