PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Why Steve Jobs Would Have Admired The Lumia 900 - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Why Steve Jobs Would Have Admired The Lumia 900

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 104,608
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 10 April 2012 - 06:06 AM

Post your comments for Why Steve Jobs Would Have Admired the Lumia 900 here
0

#2 User is offline   ChristopherMartinez 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 02-April 12

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:11 AM

I don't understand why there needs to be a relevance between Steve Jobs and the Lumia 900. Let Steve Jobs rest in peace and compliment the phone by giving credit to it's creators. They deserve at least that.
0

#3 User is offline   MichaelRousseau 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 141
  • Joined: 19-October 11

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:21 AM

How about Bill Gates and his views on the Iphone? I guess the click bait power would not be there. You have no clue, just like no one else would, about Steve's view on this phone.
0

#4 User is offline   QUADICON 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,195
  • Joined: 11-May 10

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:37 AM

Maybe Steve would say, "when I talked about hummer-like phones, surely I didn't think about Nokia who is known to make great products."

Likely he was thinking of some the ugly phones, made of plastic and not all that attractive. Nokia is an OEM that can surely conpete head to head on the design curve of phones.

if only we could get allof them to start considering using ceramics or alloys to make nicer devices for those who can afford them and for those who can't, there will always be devices for them.

But if they all did it at once, it woukld drive cost down quickly because the materials would be in higher demand. anf the only way to get the business woudl be to undercut on cost to get more sales. Thus we coudl have much fancier made devices now vs later.
0

#5 User is offline   beh929 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 10-April 12

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:40 AM

Dude, you definitely have a Windows sense of aesthetics. You're right about one thing though, it does look like a flattened coffee maker.
0

#6 User is offline   beh929 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 10-April 12

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:40 AM

Dude, you definitely have a Windows (cheesy, cheap, boring, uninspired, and confused) sense of aesthetics. You're right about one thing though, it does look like a flattened coffee maker.
0

#7 User is offline   BDKennedy 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 10-April 12

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:51 AM

Being an Apple fan, I think the Lumia is beautiful. I would own one if it wasn't running Windows.
0

#8 User is offline   BDKennedy 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 10-April 12

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:51 AM

Being an Apple fan, I think the Lumia is beautiful. I would own one if it wasn't running Windows.
0

#9 User is offline   Adamg72x 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 10-April 12

  Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:55 AM

You know what ruins the whole 'seamless' thing?
The visible AT&T branding.
Too bad they couldn't at least used the AT&T (pulse/globe) logo only.
0

#10 User is offline   LordInsidious 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 335
  • Joined: 19-August 10

Posted 10 April 2012 - 09:38 AM

View PostBDKennedy, on 10 April 2012 - 07:51 AM, said:

Being an Apple fan, I think the Lumia is beautiful. I would own one if it wasn't running Windows.

Have you tried a Windows Phone?
-I stand by what I write.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users