Clock Is Ticking On Xp--time To Start Os Migration
#1
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:33 AM
#2
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:41 AM
#3
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:49 AM
redofromstart, on 11 April 2012 - 08:41 AM, said:
Thanks for pointing out the errant apostrophe in the blurb that accompanies the article. It's been eradicated.
As for the stability--Microsoft will no longer be developing patches and updates for the OS. There are still frequent updates to XP--both security related and not. The non-security fixes are generally minor, and may only be relevant to a small segment of XP users, but no business should run on an unsupported OS.
PCWorld Net Work Blogger
Email: tbradley@pcworld.com
Twitter: TheTonyBradley
Facebook: Join the Page
#4
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:17 AM
Anyway, I said that I started the migration... to Mac. And I'll never look back.
I just repent all these years working with such an inferior and frustrating Operating System.
#5
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:20 AM
#6
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:22 AM
#7
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:27 AM
#8
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:32 AM
RaulCristianAguirre, on 11 April 2012 - 09:17 AM, said:
Anyway, I said that I started the migration... to Mac. And I'll never look back.
I just repent all these years working with such an inferior and frustrating Operating System.
Sure it's the computer that's dumb, right? Ever stop to think that you were inferior?
#9
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:42 AM
#10
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:49 AM
People don't buy Microsoft software, they buy what ever's bundled in with their hardware. (And if you believe Romney, corporations are people too.)
I happen to know of a company that is STILL running OS/2 on their ancient but reliable Fax servers.
OS/2 for heaven's sake.
Accountants don't spend a nickel if they don't absolutely have to, so the machines get replaced as needed and ONLY after a unit has failed.
IBM made terrific machines in their day.
#11
Posted 11 April 2012 - 10:23 AM
RogerWAmidon, on 11 April 2012 - 09:42 AM, said:
I'd be more concerned if they didn't find these issues!
#12
Posted 11 April 2012 - 10:25 AM
#13
Posted 11 April 2012 - 10:28 AM
LanceGiller, on 11 April 2012 - 09:22 AM, said:
I've been using Windows and MS products for 30 years. No compatability issues, no hunting for drivers, no need for other software to compensate for NOT having MS products. No need to pay double PC costs. Makes me wonder what your problem actually was.
#14
Posted 11 April 2012 - 10:29 AM
RogerWAmidon, on 11 April 2012 - 09:42 AM, said:
Roger - you do not think that the code base of Windows XP is the same as 2001 do you and they are still finding issues in the same piece of code? Most code is rewritten, refactored, and replaced over time. Pieces come and go. I would be concerned if no security patches were being done, which will be the case in 24 months.
#15
Posted 11 April 2012 - 11:16 AM
tonybradley, on 11 April 2012 - 08:49 AM, said:
redofromstart, on 11 April 2012 - 08:41 AM, said:
Thanks for pointing out the errant apostrophe in the blurb that accompanies the article. It's been eradicated.
As for the stability--Microsoft will no longer be developing patches and updates for the OS. There are still frequent updates to XP--both security related and not. The non-security fixes are generally minor, and may only be relevant to a small segment of XP users, but no business should run on an unsupported OS.
No new patches don't make it less stable or less secure. It just means that that it won't be getting any MORE stable or secure. The absence of a positive is not a negative.
#16
Posted 11 April 2012 - 11:44 AM
RaulCristianAguirre, on 11 April 2012 - 09:17 AM, said:
Anyway, I said that I started the migration... to Mac. And I'll never look back.
I just repent all these years working with such an inferior and frustrating Operating System.
MAC OSX is just a closed source GUI and a set of apps stacked on top of a 100% free open source operating system called Darwin. (BSD/UNIX/GNU)
You can get the same from Linux and for FREE
#17
Posted 11 April 2012 - 11:46 AM
RogerWAmidon, on 11 April 2012 - 09:42 AM, said:
EXACTLY
MICROCRAP is still using the VINTAGE NT Kernel
#18
Posted 11 April 2012 - 05:25 PM
#19
Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:25 PM
#20
Posted 18 April 2012 - 07:02 AM
RossStanton, on 11 April 2012 - 10:28 AM, said:
I agree. Its not the fault of the OS. People need to understand, when you veer off the MS standard, you might have problems.
I've had virtually no compatibility issues with Windows through the years either (as long as I searched and found the appropriate drivers).
I must admit though, after I switched to Linux as my primary OS and have had fewer compatibility issues compared to windows. More drivers (modules) are built into Linux than Windows.
Issues arise for most people(myself included) when installing a non-OEM retail copy of Windows on their systems. They do not realize that a lot of the drivers are not made by MS, and they have to hunt around a little bit. If they leave their systems "stock", you can assure close to zero problems arise.
Help












