PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Life On Mars? We've Been Wrong Before - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Life On Mars? We've Been Wrong Before

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,924
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:42 PM

Post your comments for Life on Mars? We've Been Wrong Before here
0

#2 User is offline   rational 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 17-November 11

  Posted 13 April 2012 - 02:41 PM

This reads like it was written by a third grader. .
0

#3 User is offline   Yargs 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: PC World Editorial
  • Posts: 314
  • Joined: 04-March 08

  Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:29 PM

Hello--PCWolrd copy editor here. I noticed a couple of grammatical problems with this piece when I read it a few minutes ago, and then I saw the unflattering comment from rational, so I decided to break our rule against copyediting blog posts, in order to clear up some of the problems I found.

The article still has youthful touches such as "skateboarding hipster microbes or bacteria," but it no longer says "So where's the life? Well that's a complicated answer" and "A purely physical process...are not that complex."

Thanks for reading.
0

#4 User is offline   rational 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 17-November 11

Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:30 AM

View PostYargs, on 13 April 2012 - 07:29 PM, said:

Hello--PCWolrd copy editor here. I noticed a couple of grammatical problems with this piece when I read it a few minutes ago, and then I saw the unflattering comment from rational, so I decided to break our rule against copyediting blog posts, in order to clear up some of the problems I found.

The article still has youthful touches such as "skateboarding hipster microbes or bacteria," but it no longer says "So where's the life? Well that's a complicated answer" and "A purely physical process...are not that complex."

Thanks for reading.

0

#5 User is offline   mjd420nova 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,984
  • Joined: 05-August 06
  • Location:Fremont, California

Posted 14 April 2012 - 10:59 AM

Our definition of LIFE is pretty confined to what we understand of how LIFE exists on our own little world. Until we can actually get there, wherever that might be, it would take a very elaborate research setup to examine the elements present and that's not possible with the immense gravity well we live on.
0

#6 User is offline   JTF243 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 131
  • Joined: 07-August 08

  Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:56 PM

Yargs - you (or Jason) could have also left out the part at the end about his being "terrified" of life on Mars. We didn't need to told that and was not relevant to the story. More information about the "processes" the scientists examined and compared would have helpful and better suited to the article.
0

#7 User is offline   xyberviri 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 662
  • Joined: 15-March 10

  Posted 16 April 2012 - 05:49 AM

I think scientists should stop trying to prove if there "once was life on mars" and just go with something they can prove which is "Can mars currently support life and if so what terraforming is needed"
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users