PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Windows Rt To Support Arm-based Processors - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Windows Rt To Support Arm-based Processors

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,805
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:57 AM

Post your comments for Windows RT to Support ARM-Based Processors here
0

#2 User is offline   KevinWires 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-April 12

  Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:55 AM

Aren't they afraid this will be confused with the IBM 6150 RT PC?
0

#3 User is offline   niboned 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 07-June 07

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:04 AM

View PostKevinWires, on 17 April 2012 - 09:55 AM, said:

Aren't they afraid this will be confused with the IBM 6150 RT PC?

Good one, Gramps. They will also include a 20ma current loop and VT50 emulation standard, just for you!
0

#4 User is offline   harris0n 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-April 12

  Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:30 AM

Mr. Mello, the first paragraph in your article probably is, sadly, news to some. Sinofsky didn't 'recently' write that blog post (Feb 9th?), at least not recently in terms of software development time-frames and news cycles. The only news here is the name change from Windows 8 to Windows RT.
0

#5 User is offline   MikeJarosz 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 03-October 09

  Posted 18 April 2012 - 05:08 AM

Hah!!!!!! I must be one of the few living former RT users. We were a beta site for IBM. We had six of them locked up in a secret room for testing. Mediocre hardware, but I fell in love with Unix on that machine. I still use MKS Unix on all my Windows machines.
0

#6 User is offline   JamieDarnell 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 18-April 12

  Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:36 AM

Windows 8 looks pathetic, especially for an OS that WILL run on a desktop, and should be accommodated as such. Not everyone wants to "move into the future", and that should be highly reconsidered. Myself will not be touching this OS with a pole. Better keep Windows 7 on shelves until Windows 9 comes out.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users