Post your comments for Microsoft and Openness: Can It Really Commit? here
Page 1 of 1
Microsoft And Openness: Can It Really Commit?
#2
Posted 17 April 2012 - 04:45 PM
I might begin to believe that Microsoft is truly interested in helping the open source community when Microsoft makes XP open source in 2014 when all support is to end for that OS.
http://www.pcworld.c...windows_xp.html
http://www.pcworld.c...windows_xp.html
#3
Posted 17 April 2012 - 04:50 PM
kenshabby, on 17 April 2012 - 04:45 PM, said:
I might begin to believe that Microsoft is truly interested in helping the open source community when Microsoft makes XP open source in 2014 when all support is to end for that OS.
http://www.pcworld.c...windows_xp.html
http://www.pcworld.c...windows_xp.html
It'll never happen. If XP were open source, invariably someone would grab it, updated it, and possibly keep Microsoft from selling you Windows 8 or 9. Microsoft doesn't want to have to compete with itself. Personally, I think this whole "open" thing Microsoft is doing is all for show. I'll believe they're serious about it when they open source something that really matters. PlayReady would be a great place to start. Barring that, they could just drop all their demands for licensing from manufacturers of Android devices. I just don't see any of that happening though. Microsoft will be "open" when it suits them, and "closed" when it doesn't. In short, Microsoft will be Microsoft. This changes nothing in my book.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.linuxrants.com
http://twitter.com/linuxrants
http://facebook.com/linuxrants
Google+
"42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot."
— Steven Wright
"Dawn: When men of reason go to bed."
— Ambrose Bierce
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.linuxrants.com
http://twitter.com/linuxrants
http://facebook.com/linuxrants
Google+
"42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot."
— Steven Wright
"Dawn: When men of reason go to bed."
— Ambrose Bierce
Spoiler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#4
Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:53 PM
No way M$ open sources XP
They would be giving away their kernel code which ALL windows based operating systems are based on. Think about that Windows 98, 2000, XP, VISTA, 7, 8 are all built on NT technology.
Open source XP and I bet the open source community would be able to make a better Windows then MicroSuck can. Thus making their POS operating systems useless.
They would be giving away their kernel code which ALL windows based operating systems are based on. Think about that Windows 98, 2000, XP, VISTA, 7, 8 are all built on NT technology.
Open source XP and I bet the open source community would be able to make a better Windows then MicroSuck can. Thus making their POS operating systems useless.
#5
Posted 18 April 2012 - 01:07 PM
I am a bit cynical about MS's motive: In order to fight open source better, MS figures it needs to get much deeper inside the open source community to know all the ins and outs and then uses that knowledge against the open source community on the legal front. Imho
#6
Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:58 PM
RickDobbelmannqbtt, on 17 April 2012 - 09:53 PM, said:
No way M$ open sources XP
They would be giving away their kernel code which ALL windows based operating systems are based on. Think about that Windows 98, 2000, XP, VISTA, 7, 8 are all built on NT technology.
Open source XP and I bet the open source community would be able to make a better Windows then MicroSuck can. Thus making their POS operating systems useless.
They would be giving away their kernel code which ALL windows based operating systems are based on. Think about that Windows 98, 2000, XP, VISTA, 7, 8 are all built on NT technology.
Open source XP and I bet the open source community would be able to make a better Windows then MicroSuck can. Thus making their POS operating systems useless.
You do know that Windows 98 is NOT NT based, right?
"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" -- Isaac Asimov
Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png
Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
Help













