Windows Phone Is 'beautiful', Better Than Android: Steve Wozniak
#1
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:45 AM
#2
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:01 AM
It's like saying PC is better than Mac, just false.
#3
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:06 AM
#5
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:10 AM
HUNGRY.
Microsoft and Nokia are HUNGRY to make a great product and experience.
Something APPLE really needs to watch carefully lest their $100B in the bank makes them as lazy as the mobile sales guys.
#6
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:19 AM
#7
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:36 AM
#8
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:39 AM
#10
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:50 AM
WilliamONeillna40, on 30 April 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:
The fact that your only argument that Windows Phone tops all other mobile OS's is due to Facebook Chat integration into the OS saddens me. That feature may be a good reason for you to stand your ground but my phone's OS has a built in phone and SMS feature! I don't have to worry about Facebook's privacy issues when I talk to people...
#11
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:51 AM
Why not write everything Woz said like, "apps looks so much better on Windows Phone than on IOS or Android". He didn't only take jabs at Android, he took some at IOS.
#12
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:55 AM
The only reason people are not buying Windows phones is because providers are not pushing them. AT&T didn't start selling any Windows devices until the Nokia advertising campaign. If that was done from the start, it would be a completely different story. That and people like you badmouthing them without any knowledge on how to use them. It is not an Android phone, and will not work like one.
dailymisleader, on 30 April 2012 - 10:01 AM, said:
It's like saying PC is better than Mac, just false.
#13
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:56 AM
"....I'm just shocked, I haven't seen anything yet that isn't more beautiful than the other platforms"
"Intuitive and beautiful"
"it's makes me feel 'Oh my gosh, I'm with a friend not a tool'" (In regards to the animations and graphics)
"I just really like the experience and will be carrying the Windows Phone everywhere"
He also notes how apps look just "more beautiful than on Android or iPhone"
#14
Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:18 AM
#15
Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:38 AM
Thats also like saying googled Hired someone from apple to copy, Loads of absolute BS.
Pretty much stuck on his old Mac vs Windows days isn't he now.
never the less least he can somewhat admire other's work.
#16
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:06 PM
dailymisleader, on 30 April 2012 - 10:01 AM, said:
It's like saying PC is better than Mac, just false.
ok man i understand that android is way better than windows mango but you are hell off on the second part, a windows pc has million times more potential than mac, the people who use mac either like its look or dont know crap about using windows:in other case for music and video editing.
#17
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:14 PM
dailymisleader, on 30 April 2012 - 10:01 AM, said:
It's like saying PC is better than Mac, just false.
A PC is better than MAC,
As long as Linux is installed on the PC.
#18
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:16 PM
mukhan444, on 30 April 2012 - 12:06 PM, said:
dailymisleader, on 30 April 2012 - 10:01 AM, said:
It's like saying PC is better than Mac, just false.
ok man i understand that android is way better than windows mango but you are hell off on the second part, a windows pc has million times more potential than mac, the people who use mac either like its look or dont know crap about using windows:in other case for music and video editing.
No Windows sucks..
You have been duped by the microsoft advertising gimmick.
The Windows NT kernel which ALL Microsoft operating systems have at its core is based on Windows 98 technology.
No thanks!
#19
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:30 PM
RickDobbelmannqbtt, on 30 April 2012 - 12:16 PM, said:
mukhan444, on 30 April 2012 - 12:06 PM, said:
dailymisleader, on 30 April 2012 - 10:01 AM, said:
It's like saying PC is better than Mac, just false.
ok man i understand that android is way better than windows mango but you are hell off on the second part, a windows pc has million times more potential than mac, the people who use mac either like its look or dont know crap about using windows:in other case for music and video editing.
No Windows sucks..
You have been duped by the microsoft advertising gimmick.
The Windows NT kernel which ALL Microsoft operating systems have at its core is based on Windows 98 technology.
No thanks!
#20
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:34 PM
fumugu, on 30 April 2012 - 12:30 PM, said:
RickDobbelmannqbtt, on 30 April 2012 - 12:16 PM, said:
mukhan444, on 30 April 2012 - 12:06 PM, said:
dailymisleader, on 30 April 2012 - 10:01 AM, said:
It's like saying PC is better than Mac, just false.
ok man i understand that android is way better than windows mango but you are hell off on the second part, a windows pc has million times more potential than mac, the people who use mac either like its look or dont know crap about using windows:in other case for music and video editing.
No Windows sucks..
You have been duped by the microsoft advertising gimmick.
The Windows NT kernel which ALL Microsoft operating systems have at its core is based on Windows 98 technology.
No thanks!
Windows 7 is NT 6.1 to be percise. NT 6.0 was Windows Vista. NT 6.2 will be Windows 8
Windows NT is a family of operating systems produced by Microsoft, the first version of which was released in July 1993. It was a powerful high-level-language-based, processor-independent, multiprocessing, multiuser operating system with features comparable to Unix. It was intended to complement consumer versions of Windows that were based on MS-DOS. NT was the first fully 32-bit version of Windows, whereas its consumer-oriented counterparts, Windows 3.1x and Windows 9x, were 16-bit/32-bit hybrids. Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, Windows Home Server, Windows Server 2008, and Windows 7 are effectively Windows NT, although they are not branded using that name.
Windows NT introduced its own driver model, the Windows NT driver model, and is incompatible with older driver frameworks. With Windows 2000, the Windows NT driver model was enhanced to become the Windows Driver Model, which was first introduced with Windows 98, but was based on the NT driver model.[17] Windows Vista added native support for the Windows Driver Foundation, which is also available for Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and to an extent, Windows 2000.
http://en.wikipedia....ows_NT#Releases
http://en.wikipedia....wiki/Windows_NT
Good luck and again,
No thanks!
This post has been edited by RickDobbelmannqbtt: 30 April 2012 - 12:47 PM
Help












