Intel's Ivy Bridge Chips Appear To Run Hotter When Overclocked

Page 1 of 1

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Intel's Ivy Bridge Chips Appear To Run Hotter When Overclocked

#1 PCWorld

Advanced Member

Group: PCWorld BOT
Posts: 103,722
Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:43 AM

Post your comments for Intel's Ivy Bridge Chips Appear to Run Hotter When Overclocked here

#2 jeneastonvdr6

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 14-December 11

Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:18 PM

*labeling under "duh"

#3 BrysonCanyon

Newbie

Group: New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 30-April 12

Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:49 PM

Idiots will do this, hurt themselves and then sue the computer manufacturer.

#4 TOREZA33

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 38
Joined: 29-January 08

Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:53 PM

Looking at Anand's chart, it is catastrophic for Intel's new Ivy Bridge.Running at @ 200 degrees is something to think about.It is a 3 years since intel makes nothing... crap crap crap. Grade school mistakes,unbelivable, again...

#5 dalmore

Newbie

Group: New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 30-April 12

Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:49 PM

TOREZA33, on 30 April 2012 - 02:53 PM, said:

Go and hide under a bridge already. Your comment is not harmless. It takes up space, and makes it so that people have to scroll down further to see worthwhile comments that are posted after yours.
If you are genuinely upset about the overclocking limits of Ivy, wait, or buy a Sandy i5. They are cheap and tasty, and they came out less than three years ago - much less. If you choose to wait, you can make it your home project to build a microprocessor. All your teachers will be impressed.

#6 waldojim

Elite

Group: Members
Posts: 15,066
Joined: 29-October 08
Location:Texas

Posted 01 May 2012 - 12:02 AM

These things come with new technology. That may also be part of what Intel was hoping for with the new transistors. Something where they could control the power consumption at the speeds they wanted, while ensuring they heat up fast when overclocked. That would certainly help deter overclocking, and convince more people to simply pay more for faster speeds.

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" -- Isaac Asimov

Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png

#7 Soundjudgment

Advanced Member

Group: Members
Posts: 441
Joined: 22-January 10

Posted 01 May 2012 - 03:12 AM

waldojim, on 01 May 2012 - 12:02 AM, said:

"Intel's - Ivy Bridge: Engineered to run hotter!"

#8 AnhBi

Newbie

Group: New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 01-May 12

Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:17 PM

Bore, Intell with China's style @@

#9 waldojim

Elite

Group: Members
Posts: 15,066
Joined: 29-October 08
Location:Texas

Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:24 PM

Soundjudgment, on 01 May 2012 - 03:12 AM, said:

waldojim, on 01 May 2012 - 12:02 AM, said:

"Intel's - Ivy Bridge: Engineered to run hotter!"

For all we know it could be.

Thought it could also simply be the fact that this is the first ever known use of the "3d transistor". I needed quotes there of course for the obvious reason... namely that all matter is "3d".

#10 bigbear639

Full Member

Group: Members
Posts: 84
Joined: 20-May 09

Posted 02 May 2012 - 06:26 AM

dalmore, on 30 April 2012 - 11:49 PM, said:

TOREZA33, on 30 April 2012 - 02:53 PM, said:

And your comment is harmless? Idiots try to overclock, probably the same ones who go over the posted speed limit, because limits do not apply to them.

#11 QUADICON

Expert

Group: Members
Posts: 4,186
Joined: 11-May 10

Posted 02 May 2012 - 10:26 AM

So didn't the Pentium D get hotter overclocked vs the Pentium 4 with hyper-threading hen over clocked? Didn't the original Core get hotter vs Pentium D when overclocked. Doesn't an engine in a car design to go as fast as 200mph run hotter thank the average car that does 120mph?

How is this news? Oh wait, no Apple news so let's reach for straws.

#12 QUADICON

Expert

Group: Members
Posts: 4,186
Joined: 11-May 10

Posted 02 May 2012 - 10:27 AM

In other news, Pan-Cakes aren't really cakes and Koala Bears aren't really bears.

#13 QUADICON

Expert

Group: Members
Posts: 4,186
Joined: 11-May 10

Posted 02 May 2012 - 10:31 AM

Why would you need to go faster than 3.9Ghz? Just to say you can?
And if real overclockers can fine a way to take a 3Ghz chip and run it at 6Ghz stable with a way to keep it cool, they will do the same for this one. For the amateurs, maybe you should steer clear.

#14 waldojim

Elite

Group: Members
Posts: 15,066
Joined: 29-October 08
Location:Texas

Posted 02 May 2012 - 11:19 AM

QUADICON, on 02 May 2012 - 10:26 AM, said:

Core was always more efficient - even over clocked.

#15 apaintz

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 23-January 08

Posted 02 May 2012 - 01:47 PM

"Ivy"(whatever) is a bad Omen!

#16 iralaser

Newbie

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 12-August 10

Posted 11 May 2012 - 03:40 AM

Your equating a temperature rise of 20 deg C with 68 deg F is wrong. A delta of 20 deg C equals a delta of 36 def F.

If someone has already pointed it out, I haven't noticed.