PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Judge Throws Out Mass John Doe Porn Copyright Lawsuits - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Judge Throws Out Mass John Doe Porn Copyright Lawsuits

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,723
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 04 May 2012 - 08:30 AM

Post your comments for Judge Throws out Mass John Doe Porn Copyright Lawsuits here
0

#2 User is offline   Fatesrider 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 169
  • Joined: 12-March 12

  Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:04 AM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this tactic of suing the "location" of the IP address EXACTLY what the RIAA did?

Apparently the porn industry hasn't paid enough graft into the justice system to get the same preferential treatment to hose the rights of the citizens of the country like the RIAA has done.
0

#3 User is offline   mike6875 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 01-July 07

  Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:08 AM

Way to go Judge Brown,it's about time somebody told these clowns were to stick it.(no pun intended)
0

#4 User is offline   mike6875 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 01-July 07

Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:13 AM

View PostFatesrider, on 04 May 2012 - 11:04 AM, said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this tactic of suing the "location" of the IP address EXACTLY what the RIAA did?

Apparently the porn industry hasn't paid enough graft into the justice system to get the same preferential treatment to hose the rights of the citizens of the country like the RIAA has done.

Maybe the Judges are starting to see thru these scumbags.
0

#5 User is offline   HighSierra 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: 21-July 07

  Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:45 AM

ha, ha, ha, ha thud.
0

#6 User is offline   TheTess 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 843
  • Joined: 12-March 10
  • Location:USA

  Posted 04 May 2012 - 12:04 PM

Yep, good to see the judges are starting to understand that 1 IP address does not stand for 1 PC or person. Tou know how many people use my main PC in my livingroom? omg! From family to friends. OR when the MPAA was caught downloading full seasons of "Dexter", they pleaded... "wasnt us, the IP addy was spoofed. So to everyone out there, remember that excuse. Whats good for the geese is good for the gander! 1 SET of RULES/LAWS. NOT 2!

In another article a judge used the "Landline phone" as an example does not stand for 1 perosn. People have roommates, family, friends etc that use it.

This is also the biggest waste of a courts time and taxpayers money.
They need to go after WHO is putting the media online, somehow the screeners are getting leaked. They need to look in there own backyard first.
0

#7 User is offline   Yargs 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: PC World Editorial
  • Posts: 314
  • Joined: 04-March 08

  Posted 04 May 2012 - 08:16 PM

I recommend that the Porn Industry Motion Picture Association (PIMPA) find itself an influential ex-U.S. senator to take the reins (so to speak) and help ensure that its interests receive suitably sympathetic under-the-Beltway treatment from Congress.
0

#8 User is offline   oldschoolh4ck3r 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 880
  • Joined: 11-January 09

  Posted 05 May 2012 - 05:03 AM

This comment © me. I value it at $1 million. I'm suing all of you for making unauthorized copies in your minds. See you in court :) ($$ I'M RIIIIIITCH! $$)
---
Abort, Retry, Epic Fail? _
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users