PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Windows 8 Security: What's New - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Windows 8 Security: What's New

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,861
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:01 PM

Post your comments for Windows 8 Security: What's New here
0

#2 User is offline   MichaelMullins 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 56
  • Joined: 11-May 12

  Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:44 PM

Not a good idea to include built-in anti-virus, in my opinion. Having one built-in means less experienced users won't bother searching for alternatives, and malware creators will have a clear target to crack if they know a majority of PC users are using one particular anti-virus program.
0

#3 User is offline   AdamTansell 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-May 12

  Posted 17 May 2012 - 07:04 PM

Totally agree with Michael. In-built Anti-virus is a clear target for Virus coders. Upside is it will probably sound the death-knell for Norton's and their Trial-ware installs on new PCs.
0

#4 User is offline   DebasisSarkar 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-May 12

  Posted 17 May 2012 - 07:32 PM

Monopoly - thy name is Micro$oft
0

#5 User is offline   LiveBrianD 

  • Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,178
  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • Location:Right behind you... made you look! :D

  Posted 17 May 2012 - 08:34 PM

Why don't they just get rid of Windows Defender and include Microsoft Security Essentials then? Another option might be to, the first time the user boots the PC, ask what AV they want and offer a ton of options, including MSE. (So that you don't have everyone using one program, plus it'll satisfy the EU anti-trust regulators.)
Spoiler
"The Internet will be used for all kinds of spurious things, including fake quotes from smart people." -Albert Einstein
Need a Windows ISO image?
0

#6 User is offline   hotonehere 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 14-February 10

Posted 17 May 2012 - 09:30 PM

View PostLiveBrianD, on 17 May 2012 - 08:34 PM, said:

Why don't they just get rid of Windows Defender and include Microsoft Security Essentials then? Another option might be to, the first time the user boots the PC, ask what AV they want and offer a ton of options, including MSE. (So that you don't have everyone using one program, plus it'll satisfy the EU anti-trust regulators.)


Windows Defender on Windows 8 is MSE.
0

#7 User is offline   sjken 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 17
  • Joined: 19-June 10

  Posted 17 May 2012 - 09:46 PM

The important thing is for everyone to have some anti-virus protection. This makes the web safer for everyone. With the monopoly restriction the courts have placed on Microsoft, they will for sure make it an up front option for buyers to check out other anti-virus programs.
0

#8 User is offline   GetReal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 538
  • Joined: 01-April 08
  • Location:East-Central Florida

  Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:42 AM

I have used both Norton and Mcafee antivirus for years, always depressed by the way the programs slowed my system and tried to nuke my internet, finally going to no antivirus for 2 years. So when MS released Security Essentials I tried it - found it significantly fewer problems in Xp and Vista than other commercial antivirus and for over a decade with all these programs and without - never a virus or download problem!

What I am saying here is that I think most people cause their own disasters by constantly flopping around on the internet > going to bad sites and browsing foolishly.

So if there is a default firewall and antivirus built-in to the OS then this has to be an improvement for many users.
0

#9 User is offline   IronGateSecNet 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 18-May 12

  Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:41 PM

What if you have multiple devices in your home, such as an iPad or Mac, or even an older WinXP PC? How does this control a kid from just using a non-Windows 8 device? Doesn't seem effective at all if you have other web-enabled gadgets!
0

#10 User is offline   jorgecobas32 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 15-January 08

  Posted 18 May 2012 - 02:16 PM

I think is a great idea to include the antivirus with windows, that's one of the thinks i have always dislike about windows, i think is a good idea cause people that don't know to much about computers won't look for a antivirus to protect the computer. And for those who are saying that people won't have an option they do cause you can disable the windows antivirus and get which ever you like.
0

#11 User is offline   ZacharyFerreira 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 17-April 12

  Posted 18 May 2012 - 04:00 PM

Most users dont want to spend $ on an antivirus program, so they would constantly use trial programs and just constantly renew subscriptions, whereas with Win8 and Win Defender you are being protected with built in software that was made to work with win8. Win8 has to have built in antivirus software because you sign into a microsoft account at statrup and Win8 connects email skydrive and live account at the start menu.
0

#12 User is offline   jscott418 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 271
  • Joined: 08-February 10

  Posted 18 May 2012 - 06:33 PM

A basic AntiVirus built into Windows is needed. People tend to buy PC's use the free Anti Virus trial and never pay for it. So the definitions become out dated and your PC vulnerable. Having a least basic AV for some protection is a good ideal.
0

#13 User is offline   JohnUSA 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 30-March 10

  Posted 19 May 2012 - 04:44 AM

I will never use this horrible and frustrating OS.
Microsoft is going to be a huge loser with this OS.
I will wait till Windows 7 SP2 is released.
0

#14 User is offline   YellowEagle 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 238
  • Joined: 24-February 08

Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:52 AM

View PostJohnUSA, on 19 May 2012 - 04:44 AM, said:

I will never use this horrible and frustrating OS.
Microsoft is going to be a huge loser with this OS.
I will wait till Windows 7 SP2 is released.


Or wait till Windows 9 comes out
0

#15 User is offline   nijaboy2 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 41
  • Joined: 13-April 10

Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:58 AM

View PostJohnUSA, on 19 May 2012 - 04:44 AM, said:

I will never use this horrible and frustrating OS.
Microsoft is going to be a huge loser with this OS.
I will wait till Windows 7 SP2 is released.

So, who cares about what you plan to do?
-1

#16 User is offline   julio99 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 22-July 10

Posted 21 May 2012 - 05:08 AM

View Postnijaboy2, on 21 May 2012 - 03:58 AM, said:

View PostJohnUSA, on 19 May 2012 - 04:44 AM, said:

I will never use this horrible and frustrating OS.
Microsoft is going to be a huge loser with this OS.
I will wait till Windows 7 SP2 is released.

So, who cares about what you plan to do?

He has a right to an opinion just like you. I care what he has to say or I wouldn't be on this page reading. I usually end up moving on to a new OS, but like the previous poster has said "I think I may wait for 7-SP2 or Windows 9 if Microsoft plans on building an OS strictly for PC's and laptops and stay away from trying to accommodate the Tablets and IPads. I haven't used the Consumer preview of Win 8 because it has gotten so much bad press and the fact that it looks like it's built for tablets and IPads has kept me away from going forward this time. I like the simplicity of Windows 7 plain and simple.
1

#17 User is offline   jorgemt 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: 16-April 09

  Posted 21 May 2012 - 05:17 AM

Why do I bother? I keep trying to find evaluations here, and I keep finding Microsoft's brochures.

I use Defender while installing a new PC as a minimal protection until I can download AVG.

I don't find easy to trust an antivirus that has to deal with attacks which profits from vulnerabilities in an operative system created by the same company.
0

#18 User is offline   jazzy007 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 618
  • Joined: 24-January 10

Posted 21 May 2012 - 12:27 PM

View PostMichaelMullins, on 17 May 2012 - 06:44 PM, said:

Not a good idea to include built-in anti-virus, in my opinion. Having one built-in means less experienced users won't bother searching for alternatives, and malware creators will have a clear target to crack if they know a majority of PC users are using one particular anti-virus program.

I know this is your opinion, but comments like this shows the ignorance or bias people might have. On this age of technology, all PC buyers except for Apple products knows of anti-virus and the need to have one. The Microsoft free anti-virus Essentials has prove time and time again that it's as good as the best paid anti-virus. It does not have all the bells and whistle as the pay anti-virus but it does the job just as well. For Malware it's not the best, but there are many excellent free anti-malware that you can combine with Essentials. Most consumer will buy their regular anti-virus of choice or get their choice of free ones.

As for less experienced users like you mention, they would not bother even to consider to buy an anti-virus. If they buy a Windows tablet they will no even think about it because most IPad users don't even think about this. But many Apple users are now finding out that their product are not free of virus as they were let to believe. So even a simple free anti-virus on your tablet, desktop, laptop is a good thing.

As for Norton, McAfee and others they already gave their blessing to Microsoft. If you remember a year or two ago, Norton and other anti-virus company made a big issue of Microsoft entering the anti-virus business, even treating to sue. But they make up and gave Microsoft their blessing. So what Microsoft is offering is a basic free anti-virus. It will never compete with the Anti-virus companies, and something is better than nothing. Do not underestimate PC users unlike Apple users that still believe a virus with never affect their computers or IPad.
0

#19 User is offline   ChuckUFarley 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 13-November 09

  Posted 21 May 2012 - 06:27 PM

View PostJohnUSA, on 19 May 2012 - 04:44 AM, said:

I will never use this horrible and frustrating OS.
Microsoft is going to be a huge loser with this OS.
I will wait till Windows 7 SP2 is released.



Frustrating?!?!?!?!
After a few days of use, I found it quite intuitive actually.
To each their own I suppose.
Ludites will be Ludites, and resist at every turn.
I am not a huge fan of Win8 yet, but I do indeed like it; and that is on a 3 year old HP laptop with mouse gestures.
Quite easy to navigate really.
I again, don't understand all of the bitching. The "normal" desktop is there, right at your fingertips, or lower left corner click, for crying out loud!
-1

#20 User is offline   justplanebill 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15
  • Joined: 02-September 06

  Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:56 AM

I have MS Security Essentials on my

XP Laptop. It always hangs about one

quarter through every scan. I have

tried to update definitions but it

will not do it. ???
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users