Help
Post your comments for Google Asked to Yank a Million Search Results a Month here
Page 1 of 1
Google Asked To Yank A Million Search Results A Month
#3
captbilly 
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 22-February 10
Posted 25 May 2012 - 01:25 PM
This makes no sense: "While requests for URL purges have increased, so has Google's response time to those requests, according to von Lohman. Through the use of improved tools, the company has pared its average processing time for an URL purge request to 11 hours." It seems to me that the author was really trying to say that Google's response time has decreased, but what John Mello actually said was the opposite.
#4
thewazak
- Expert
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,077
- Joined: 29-January 08
Posted 25 May 2012 - 02:03 PM
captbilly, on 25 May 2012 - 01:25 PM, said:
This makes no sense: "While requests for URL purges have increased, so has Google's response time to those requests, according to von Lohman. Through the use of improved tools, the company has pared its average processing time for an URL purge request to 11 hours." It seems to me that the author was really trying to say that Google's response time has decreased, but what John Mello actually said was the opposite.
What do you expect on PCW? Good English and unbiased opinion?
To disagree without being disagreeable is the art of debate. Simply because one has a strong opinion, it does not necessarily make an alternative opinion less valid.
#6
deepsand
- Expert
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,558
- Joined: 28-August 06
Posted 25 May 2012 - 07:12 PM
ML2376, on 25 May 2012 - 10:58 AM, said:
So at the same time the Internet becomes more dangerous it's becoming less useful. Great.
Less useful how?
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
#7
Tinman1957
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 194
- Joined: 19-December 09
Posted 26 May 2012 - 03:45 PM
captbilly, on 25 May 2012 - 01:25 PM, said:
This makes no sense: "While requests for URL purges have increased, so has Google's response time to those requests, according to von Lohman. Through the use of improved tools, the company has pared its average processing time for an URL purge request to 11 hours." It seems to me that the author was really trying to say that Google's response time has decreased, but what John Mello actually said was the opposite.
No, that's about right considering GoOgle uses tracking techniques (spying)to keep record of who's doing what. They're kind of like the internet police's database of who is doing what, when and where....
#8
Tinman1957
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 194
- Joined: 19-December 09
Posted 26 May 2012 - 04:01 PM
deepsand, on 25 May 2012 - 07:12 PM, said:
ML2376, on 25 May 2012 - 10:58 AM, said:
So at the same time the Internet becomes more dangerous it's becoming less useful. Great.
Less useful how?
Because of all the falsely accused links being removed, therefore no returns on a search. Best way to bypass all of GoOgles spyware and censorship is not to use their products. Want a search engine without being spied on? Use DuckDuckGo, Yebol, Blekko, BlackBoxSearch or a few other good search engines.....
#9
deepsand
- Expert
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,558
- Joined: 28-August 06
Posted 26 May 2012 - 06:36 PM
Tinman1957, on 26 May 2012 - 04:01 PM, said:
deepsand, on 25 May 2012 - 07:12 PM, said:
ML2376, on 25 May 2012 - 10:58 AM, said:
So at the same time the Internet becomes more dangerous it's becoming less useful. Great.
Less useful how?
Because of all the falsely accused links being removed, therefore no returns on a search.
That assumes that such links appear in listings that are highly ranked in the SERPs and providing of the sole point of access to unique content of value.
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1