Chrome Os Update Adds Traditional Desktop Feel
#1
Posted 30 May 2012 - 09:16 AM
#2
Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:26 PM
#3
Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:36 PM
#4
Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:42 PM
SOHAMBHATTACHARYA, on 30 May 2012 - 12:36 PM, said:
The virtual lack of sales to date speaks otherwise.
#5
Posted 31 May 2012 - 05:39 AM
#6
Posted 31 May 2012 - 11:03 AM
Quote
The subject of this thread is ChromeOS and the poor sales of Chromebooks, not Google's behavior. Do try to stay on topic.
#7
Posted 31 May 2012 - 11:21 AM
deepsand, on 31 May 2012 - 11:03 AM, said:
Quote
The subject of this thread is ChromeOS and the poor sales of Chromebooks, not Google's behavior. Do try to stay on topic.
He was stating that and reason why he wouldn't run the OS, so is essentially in line with the topic as regards the OS.
This post has been edited by coastie65: 02 June 2012 - 04:12 PM
______________________________________________________________
Gateway FX6800-01e----Intel Core i7 960 ( 3.2 GHz)---- Seagate Barracuda 750 Gb SATA II / 3.0 Hdd---- 6 Gb Crucial 1066 Mhz memory, running in Tri Channel conf-----Corsair TX650w PSU----- EVGA Nvidia GTX 560Ti 1gb GDDR5 Vram ----DVD +/- RW / CD ,RAM/DL Optical drive w/ Label Flash-----Gateway TBGM-01 Motherboard.... Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS w/ SP2; Samsung Synch Master 2243BWX 22" Monitor.
#8
Posted 01 June 2012 - 08:06 PM
#9
Posted 01 June 2012 - 09:52 PM
JamesHardin, on 01 June 2012 - 08:06 PM, said:
As a virtual POS terminal, it lacks the abilities to import data from an Order Entry sub-system, and to store and export response data into any other sub-system.
As a physical POS terminal, it is massive overkill with respect to hardware and firmware requirements, lacks the ability to handle card swiping, and cannot use a cheap POTS line for communications with a card processor's server.
As a client on a LAN, not only is it not capable of running necessary local applications, it lacks the essential ability to physically connect to a LAN.
#10
Posted 02 June 2012 - 09:44 AM
This post has been edited by coastie65: 02 June 2012 - 04:18 PM
#11
Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:19 PM
Jameshoqh, on 02 June 2012 - 09:44 AM, said:
Hi and thank you for your service. Please try to keep your posts on the topic at hand. This post could be considered confrontational and the last sentence in particular could be inflammatory.
______________________________________________________________
Gateway FX6800-01e----Intel Core i7 960 ( 3.2 GHz)---- Seagate Barracuda 750 Gb SATA II / 3.0 Hdd---- 6 Gb Crucial 1066 Mhz memory, running in Tri Channel conf-----Corsair TX650w PSU----- EVGA Nvidia GTX 560Ti 1gb GDDR5 Vram ----DVD +/- RW / CD ,RAM/DL Optical drive w/ Label Flash-----Gateway TBGM-01 Motherboard.... Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS w/ SP2; Samsung Synch Master 2243BWX 22" Monitor.
#12
Posted 22 June 2012 - 06:33 PM
i love the new chromeos and after living through 20 years of windows upgrades that took hours, this experience was a 10 second reboot.
the slow adoption is more a statement of how entrenched the file metaphor is than *any* real shortcomings of the chromebook. the fact that i have 10 hours of battery means i don't even have to bring the charger around with me. it stays at home. google stay the course!
i recommend staging a series of public/publicized time test competitions for users who in an average day open and close over 50-100 documents. three groups - mac, windows, chromeos. i can access any google document in under 5 seconds. on a filesystem/apple/sharepoint system it takes 90 seconds minimum. thats an enormous business case that cfo's will make cio's listen to.
chromeos adoption will lag but follow gdocs adoption.
#13
Posted 22 June 2012 - 07:43 PM
EricLannert, on 22 June 2012 - 06:33 PM, said:
Google docs are but a scintilla of the universe of user data.
Help













