PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Chrome Os Update Adds Traditional Desktop Feel - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Chrome Os Update Adds Traditional Desktop Feel

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,921
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 30 May 2012 - 09:16 AM

Post your comments for Chrome OS Update Adds Traditional Desktop Feel here
0

#2 User is offline   deepsand 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Joined: 28-August 06

  Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:26 PM

Sales of Chromebooks are so miniscule that they're not even being tracked by the majors.
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
0

#3 User is offline   SOHAMBHATTACHARYA 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 30-May 12

  Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:36 PM

google should jsut stick wid chromos..its promising..wud be a big thing after 2-3 years..
0

#4 User is offline   deepsand 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Joined: 28-August 06

Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:42 PM

View PostSOHAMBHATTACHARYA, on 30 May 2012 - 12:36 PM, said:

google should jsut stick wid chromos..its promising..wud be a big thing after 2-3 years..

The virtual lack of sales to date speaks otherwise.
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
0

#5 User is offline   Jameshoqh 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 29-February 12

  Posted 31 May 2012 - 05:39 AM

I don't trust Google, and never will. They track way to much, an invasion of my privacy. For that reason alone, I would never run their OS.
0

#6 User is offline   deepsand 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Joined: 28-August 06

Posted 31 May 2012 - 11:03 AM

Quote

I don't trust Google, and never will. They track way to much, an invasion of my privacy. For that reason alone, I would never run their OS.

The subject of this thread is ChromeOS and the poor sales of Chromebooks, not Google's behavior. Do try to stay on topic.
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
0

#7 User is offline   coastie65 

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 19,713
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Henrico, Va.

Posted 31 May 2012 - 11:21 AM

View Postdeepsand, on 31 May 2012 - 11:03 AM, said:

Quote

I don't trust Google, and never will. They track way to much, an invasion of my privacy. For that reason alone, I would never run their OS.

The subject of this thread is ChromeOS and the poor sales of Chromebooks, not Google's behavior. Do try to stay on topic.



He was stating that and reason why he wouldn't run the OS, so is essentially in line with the topic as regards the OS.

This post has been edited by coastie65: 02 June 2012 - 04:12 PM

Coolermaster HAF 912 Case....ASUS P8Z68-VPro MOBO.....Intel Core i7 2600k Sandy Bridge ( 4.4 Ghz ).... Gelid Tranquillo cooler.... Samsung 830 256 GB SSD.... Primary HDD- WD 1TB Caviar Black SATA III /6.0 .... SECONDARY HDD - WD 1TB Caviar Black SATA II / 3.0....8Gb GSkill Ripjaws Series X 1600 Mhz Memory....Corsair AX850w PSU....EVGA GTX 680 Super Clocked Signature 2 Gb GDDR5 Video Card....Samsung CD/DVD RW, DL, DVD-Ram, w/ Lightscribe Optical Drive....Samsung SyncMaster 2243BWX 22" Monitor..... Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit OS


http://novabench.com/image/266589.png

______________________________________________________________

Gateway FX6800-01e----Intel Core i7 960 ( 3.2 GHz)---- Seagate Barracuda 750 Gb SATA II / 3.0 Hdd---- 6 Gb Crucial 1066 Mhz memory, running in Tri Channel conf-----Corsair TX650w PSU----- EVGA Nvidia GTX 560Ti 1gb GDDR5 Vram ----DVD +/- RW / CD ,RAM/DL Optical drive w/ Label Flash-----Gateway TBGM-01 Motherboard.... Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS w/ SP2; Samsung Synch Master 2243BWX 22" Monitor.
0

#8 User is offline   JamesHardin 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 01-June 12

  Posted 01 June 2012 - 08:06 PM

They should partner with an online based POS vendor. These would make great entry level POS units for small businesses.
0

#9 User is offline   deepsand 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Joined: 28-August 06

Posted 01 June 2012 - 09:52 PM

View PostJamesHardin, on 01 June 2012 - 08:06 PM, said:

They should partner with an online based POS vendor. These would make great entry level POS units for small businesses.

As a virtual POS terminal, it lacks the abilities to import data from an Order Entry sub-system, and to store and export response data into any other sub-system.

As a physical POS terminal, it is massive overkill with respect to hardware and firmware requirements, lacks the ability to handle card swiping, and cannot use a cheap POTS line for communications with a card processor's server.

As a client on a LAN, not only is it not capable of running necessary local applications, it lacks the essential ability to physically connect to a LAN.
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
0

#10 User is offline   Jameshoqh 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 02 June 2012 - 09:44 AM

Thanks Coastie, from an ex-Coastie myself. At least you read, and proved you could comprehend my post. Some people seem to critize without being able to do either of those two things. Lol.

This post has been edited by coastie65: 02 June 2012 - 04:18 PM

0

#11 User is offline   coastie65 

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 19,713
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Henrico, Va.

Posted 02 June 2012 - 04:19 PM

View PostJameshoqh, on 02 June 2012 - 09:44 AM, said:

Thanks Coastie, from an ex-Coastie myself. At least you read, and proved you could comprehend my post. Some people seem to critize without being able to do either of those two things. Lol.



Hi and thank you for your service. Please try to keep your posts on the topic at hand. This post could be considered confrontational and the last sentence in particular could be inflammatory.
Coolermaster HAF 912 Case....ASUS P8Z68-VPro MOBO.....Intel Core i7 2600k Sandy Bridge ( 4.4 Ghz ).... Gelid Tranquillo cooler.... Samsung 830 256 GB SSD.... Primary HDD- WD 1TB Caviar Black SATA III /6.0 .... SECONDARY HDD - WD 1TB Caviar Black SATA II / 3.0....8Gb GSkill Ripjaws Series X 1600 Mhz Memory....Corsair AX850w PSU....EVGA GTX 680 Super Clocked Signature 2 Gb GDDR5 Video Card....Samsung CD/DVD RW, DL, DVD-Ram, w/ Lightscribe Optical Drive....Samsung SyncMaster 2243BWX 22" Monitor..... Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit OS


http://novabench.com/image/266589.png

______________________________________________________________

Gateway FX6800-01e----Intel Core i7 960 ( 3.2 GHz)---- Seagate Barracuda 750 Gb SATA II / 3.0 Hdd---- 6 Gb Crucial 1066 Mhz memory, running in Tri Channel conf-----Corsair TX650w PSU----- EVGA Nvidia GTX 560Ti 1gb GDDR5 Vram ----DVD +/- RW / CD ,RAM/DL Optical drive w/ Label Flash-----Gateway TBGM-01 Motherboard.... Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS w/ SP2; Samsung Synch Master 2243BWX 22" Monitor.
0

#12 User is offline   EricLannert 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 22-June 12

  Posted 22 June 2012 - 06:33 PM

i have been a chromebook owner since december 2011. by far my favorite pc. ever. i have a desktop at work, 2 desktops at home and a laptop. i was already in the cloud for everything in order to work from any machine. moving files around is simply no longer part of life or business.

i love the new chromeos and after living through 20 years of windows upgrades that took hours, this experience was a 10 second reboot.

the slow adoption is more a statement of how entrenched the file metaphor is than *any* real shortcomings of the chromebook. the fact that i have 10 hours of battery means i don't even have to bring the charger around with me. it stays at home. google stay the course!

i recommend staging a series of public/publicized time test competitions for users who in an average day open and close over 50-100 documents. three groups - mac, windows, chromeos. i can access any google document in under 5 seconds. on a filesystem/apple/sharepoint system it takes 90 seconds minimum. thats an enormous business case that cfo's will make cio's listen to.

chromeos adoption will lag but follow gdocs adoption.
0

#13 User is offline   deepsand 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Joined: 28-August 06

Posted 22 June 2012 - 07:43 PM

View PostEricLannert, on 22 June 2012 - 06:33 PM, said:

i can access any google document in under 5 seconds.

Google docs are but a scintilla of the universe of user data.
While each is entitled to his own opinion, no one is entitled to his own facts.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users