Help
Post your comments for Apple iOS Devices Have Trouble Gaining Confidence of Some IT Security Pros here
Page 1 of 1
Apple Ios Devices Have Trouble Gaining Confidence Of Some It Security Pros
Posted 02 June 2012 - 08:56 AM
#3
Jimster480 
- Senior Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 619
- Joined: 07-July 10
Posted 04 June 2012 - 06:17 AM
42n81, on 02 June 2012 - 08:56 AM, said:
What next? Will IBM ban the use of Google because search requests are uploaded to servers?
Not at all. Google tells them what goes on with the data that is inputted. Apple is saying nothing. And with it collecting speech and sending it to Apple, how can you not see how enterprises are concerned? When trade secrets can be leaked because you have the phone on you? Apple is not exactly a trustworthy or security-oriented company. With the industries lowest security levels and its misguiding and secretive policies and responses on malware issues, there is no reason anyone should.
#4
42n81
- Expert
-
- Group: Members_
- Posts: 2,248
- Joined: 19-January 10
Posted 04 June 2012 - 05:18 PM
Jimster480, on 04 June 2012 - 06:17 AM, said:
42n81, on 02 June 2012 - 08:56 AM, said:
What next? Will IBM ban the use of Google because search requests are uploaded to servers?
Not at all. Google tells them what goes on with the data that is inputted. Apple is saying nothing. And with it collecting speech and sending it to Apple, how can you not see how enterprises are concerned? When trade secrets can be leaked because you have the phone on you? Apple is not exactly a trustworthy or security-oriented company. With the industries lowest security levels and its misguiding and secretive policies and responses on malware issues, there is no reason anyone should.
Really? And what goes on with that unencrypted, unsecured search request once it leaves your modem and enters the www?
IBM is wise to be concerned with security but foolish if they think SIRI is all they have to worry about.
#5
AshioMialato
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 05-June 12
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:31 AM
42n81, on 04 June 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:
Jimster480, on 04 June 2012 - 06:17 AM, said:
42n81, on 02 June 2012 - 08:56 AM, said:
What next? Will IBM ban the use of Google because search requests are uploaded to servers?
Not at all. Google tells them what goes on with the data that is inputted. Apple is saying nothing. And with it collecting speech and sending it to Apple, how can you not see how enterprises are concerned? When trade secrets can be leaked because you have the phone on you? Apple is not exactly a trustworthy or security-oriented company. With the industries lowest security levels and its misguiding and secretive policies and responses on malware issues, there is no reason anyone should.
Really? And what goes on with that unencrypted, unsecured search request once it leaves your modem and enters the www?
IBM is wise to be concerned with security but foolish if they think SIRI is all they have to worry about.
You are definitely even more foolish to comment such. Would you think IBM security think tank is more foolish than that few kilo of those matter contained inside your skull? Do you also think that IBM network is equal to that of the general public DSL/cable/dialup?
There is a clear distinction between 1) its a fact that your querries are being collected and stored, and 2) the possibility that your querries might be intercept over WWW.
#6
AshioMialato
- Newbie
-
- Group: New Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 05-June 12
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:35 AM
42n81, on 04 June 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:
Jimster480, on 04 June 2012 - 06:17 AM, said:
42n81, on 02 June 2012 - 08:56 AM, said:
What next? Will IBM ban the use of Google because search requests are uploaded to servers?
Not at all. Google tells them what goes on with the data that is inputted. Apple is saying nothing. And with it collecting speech and sending it to Apple, how can you not see how enterprises are concerned? When trade secrets can be leaked because you have the phone on you? Apple is not exactly a trustworthy or security-oriented company. With the industries lowest security levels and its misguiding and secretive policies and responses on malware issues, there is no reason anyone should.
Really? And what goes on with that unencrypted, unsecured search request once it leaves your modem and enters the www?
IBM is wise to be concerned with security but foolish if they think SIRI is all they have to worry about.
You are definitely even more foolish to comment such. Would you think IBM security think tank is more foolish than that few kilo of those matter contained inside your skull? Do you also think that IBM network is equal to that of the general public DSL/cable/dialup?
There is a clear distinction between 1) its a fact that your querries are being collected and stored, and 2) the possibility that your querries might be intercept over WWW.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1