Samsung Galaxy S Iii Review: Your Next Android Phone
#1
Posted 19 June 2012 - 08:01 PM
#2
Posted 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM
#3
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:47 AM
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Nope. The European version uses HSPA+.
That's one more area of improvement Samsung can make. Stick another middle finger to the carriers and release a world version. They already stuck it to the man when they brought one and only one version of the S3 to all 5 carriers.
#4
Posted 20 June 2012 - 05:28 AM
zeth006, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Nope. The European version uses HSPA+.
That's one more area of improvement Samsung can make. Stick another middle finger to the carriers and release a world version. They already stuck it to the man when they brought one and only one version of the S3 to all 5 carriers.
Thank you. I agree, Samsung should do this. The carrier's have managed to fragment the GSM market with the, yet again, incompatible data standards. Frankly, this is something Congress needs to address. When it comes to data this is as bad, if not worse, than GSM vs. CDMA, and it locks the consumer in.
Anyway, any idea on why there are no existing, or even upcoming, quad cores for the US market?
#6
Posted 20 June 2012 - 06:30 AM
#7
Posted 20 June 2012 - 06:32 AM
zeth006, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Nope. The European version uses HSPA+.
That's one more area of improvement Samsung can make. Stick another middle finger to the carriers and release a world version. They already stuck it to the man when they brought one and only one version of the S3 to all 5 carriers.
If you buy the quadcore version and activate it on ATT then yes you can use THEIR HSPA+ network which is THEIR 4G network.
You can also activate the phone on T-Mobile, but it will only use their 3G network using the SIM. I am not sure if you can access their data network. With ATT you will get both even with their SIM.
#8
Posted 20 June 2012 - 06:35 AM
scoundrel, on 20 June 2012 - 05:28 AM, said:
zeth006, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Nope. The European version uses HSPA+.
That's one more area of improvement Samsung can make. Stick another middle finger to the carriers and release a world version. They already stuck it to the man when they brought one and only one version of the S3 to all 5 carriers.
Thank you. I agree, Samsung should do this. The carrier's have managed to fragment the GSM market with the, yet again, incompatible data standards. Frankly, this is something Congress needs to address. When it comes to data this is as bad, if not worse, than GSM vs. CDMA, and it locks the consumer in.
Anyway, any idea on why there are no existing, or even upcoming, quad cores for the US market?
The carriers here in the USA are the ones wo decided to go dualcore, not Samsung. I think they simply want to milk the market. Dualcore is the most common option avail. However this would have given all of them to be less dependabnt on iPhoen sales. Both Sprint and Verzion have complained about the hefty investment required to sell iphone. They both said they will push Android phones again. Gettign thr quadcore would have been a great way to start and they coudl have sold a great amoutn of these.
#9
Posted 20 June 2012 - 07:29 AM
QUADICON, on 20 June 2012 - 06:35 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 20 June 2012 - 05:28 AM, said:
zeth006, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Nope. The European version uses HSPA+.
That's one more area of improvement Samsung can make. Stick another middle finger to the carriers and release a world version. They already stuck it to the man when they brought one and only one version of the S3 to all 5 carriers.
Thank you. I agree, Samsung should do this. The carrier's have managed to fragment the GSM market with the, yet again, incompatible data standards. Frankly, this is something Congress needs to address. When it comes to data this is as bad, if not worse, than GSM vs. CDMA, and it locks the consumer in.
Anyway, any idea on why there are no existing, or even upcoming, quad cores for the US market?
The carriers here in the USA are the ones wo decided to go dualcore, not Samsung. I think they simply want to milk the market. Dualcore is the most common option avail. However this would have given all of them to be less dependabnt on iPhoen sales. Both Sprint and Verzion have complained about the hefty investment required to sell iphone. They both said they will push Android phones again. Gettign thr quadcore would have been a great way to start and they coudl have sold a great amoutn of these.
Do you seriously think the average American consumer who either preorders a phone or goes to a retail store knows or cares about the processor inside?
If so, you might be a bit out of touch with American society. Most Americans don't know much about their phones beyond what they see on the outside. You don't too often see commercials toting the processor as the primary selling feature. If anything, it's the aesthetics, the brand, and maybe even the screen quality that does the trick.
There is no "milking" of the market. The carriers don't participate in from what you see as forcing Samsung to go dualcore. I think you're seriously misinformed as to the areas Verizon and other carriers are choosing to control and manipulate.
Try reading a few more articles. The Exynos processor wasn't compatible with LTE chips.
This post has been edited by zeth006: 20 June 2012 - 07:33 AM
#10
Posted 20 June 2012 - 07:31 AM
scoundrel, on 20 June 2012 - 05:28 AM, said:
zeth006, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Nope. The European version uses HSPA+.
That's one more area of improvement Samsung can make. Stick another middle finger to the carriers and release a world version. They already stuck it to the man when they brought one and only one version of the S3 to all 5 carriers.
Thank you. I agree, Samsung should do this. The carrier's have managed to fragment the GSM market with the, yet again, incompatible data standards. Frankly, this is something Congress needs to address. When it comes to data this is as bad, if not worse, than GSM vs. CDMA, and it locks the consumer in.
Anyway, any idea on why there are no existing, or even upcoming, quad cores for the US market?
Shortage of 28nm capacity at foundries. Nvidia's having a tough time satisfying demand for its Tegra. TSMC and others aren't able to help Nvidia and others keep up with it.
#12
Posted 20 June 2012 - 02:15 PM
#13
Posted 20 June 2012 - 02:16 PM
#14
Posted 20 June 2012 - 03:13 PM
LeeKschi, on 20 June 2012 - 02:16 PM, said:
And it's clear you're not capable of speaking English intelligibly.
#15
Posted 20 June 2012 - 05:57 PM
QUADICON, on 20 June 2012 - 06:35 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 20 June 2012 - 05:28 AM, said:
zeth006, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Nope. The European version uses HSPA+.
That's one more area of improvement Samsung can make. Stick another middle finger to the carriers and release a world version. They already stuck it to the man when they brought one and only one version of the S3 to all 5 carriers.
Thank you. I agree, Samsung should do this. The carrier's have managed to fragment the GSM market with the, yet again, incompatible data standards. Frankly, this is something Congress needs to address. When it comes to data this is as bad, if not worse, than GSM vs. CDMA, and it locks the consumer in.
Anyway, any idea on why there are no existing, or even upcoming, quad cores for the US market?
The carriers here in the USA are the ones wo decided to go dualcore, not Samsung. I think they simply want to milk the market. Dualcore is the most common option avail. However this would have given all of them to be less dependabnt on iPhoen sales. Both Sprint and Verzion have complained about the hefty investment required to sell iphone. They both said they will push Android phones again. Gettign thr quadcore would have been a great way to start and they coudl have sold a great amoutn of these.
Thank you.
#16
Posted 21 June 2012 - 08:02 AM
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
Well, unfortunately European service providers don't use LTE for their 4G connections, so no you would not be able to get your 4G LTE in America. However, the phone is built so well that it flies at 3G speeds as well as with its ultra-fast 4G, so some people, myself included, see it as a worthy sacrifice to give up 4G for 3G.
Take into account the greater processing power of the International version, and the phone will perform with ever-so-slightly less speed than with 4G
#17
Posted 21 June 2012 - 11:33 AM
LeeKschi, on 20 June 2012 - 02:16 PM, said:
Thank you..The US has android. iOS and even Windows Phone. The rest of you can use Symbian and Blackberry.
#18
Posted 23 June 2012 - 10:33 PM
scoundrel, on 19 June 2012 - 10:05 PM, said:
No it won't thats why we the the Dual core. the quadcore is not compatible with LTE.
The Quadcore only works with hspa which is alot slower than LTE, i wish i could also
have Quadcore chip but we have to sacrifice something for now. Hopefully the Quadcore chip
will be compatible in the future.
#19
Posted 25 June 2012 - 06:25 AM
JanieAddams, on 20 June 2012 - 12:40 PM, said:
Wow. Just WOW. Do you not realize that the S3 is thinner, has a bigger screen but is smaller, has a much faster processor, has three times the pixels, has many features that the S2 doesn't have, is the same price as much worse phones, has twice the RAM, has more memory, and much more?
#20
Posted 25 June 2012 - 06:27 AM
LeeKschi, on 20 June 2012 - 02:15 PM, said:
Especially since Android is made in the US.
In case you were unintelligent enough to tell, that was sarcasm.
Help













