PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Data Snatchers! The Booming Market For Your Online Identity - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Data Snatchers! The Booming Market For Your Online Identity

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,839
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 26 June 2012 - 08:52 AM

Post your comments for Data Snatchers! The Booming Market for Your Online Identity here
0

#2 User is offline   jstatum 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: 17-November 06

  Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:17 PM

We need to lobby Congress and hire lawyers to represent us against the companies who sell our data and information. I would start with us being able to charge these companies royalties when they use our personal data and or name when they sell the information.
0

#3 User is offline   Internet2k4 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 134
  • Joined: 27-January 09

  Posted 26 June 2012 - 04:50 PM

Have to say, I was skeptical of the FB stock offering on the basis that I doubted the data collection could be monetized on FB's own service (do people really want to think about ads when sharing with family?) but the financial proposition becomes much more interesting when FB aggregates its own user data to sell targeted advertising everyplace else on the internet. Obviously this raises disclosure and other public policy issues, but the world seems to be full of chatty folks who don't mind at all.
0

#4 User is offline   tonyatn 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 89
  • Joined: 25-November 06

  Posted 26 June 2012 - 05:43 PM

BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU. The thought police is here.
Read the book "1984." The future of no individuality, no privacy has come.
0

#5 User is offline   campbell2644 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 138
  • Joined: 21-February 07

Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:20 AM

View Postjstatum, on 26 June 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

We need to lobby Congress and hire lawyers to represent us against the companies who sell our data and information. I would start with us being able to charge these companies royalties when they use our personal data and or name when they sell the information.

You are quite right but the problem is that corporate lobbyists and sponsors make our elected representatives answerable to them not to the voters.
0

#6 User is offline   terp66 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 04-August 06

  Posted 03 July 2012 - 05:29 AM

Having to know to go to BlueCava's website to unsubscribe from their Device ID is like having to know that a police force has installed a GPS tracker on your car and going to the right police force to ask them to remove it. That is not what the Supreme Court said.
0

#7 User is offline   GrossTyro 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 55
  • Joined: 24-January 07

  Posted 03 July 2012 - 10:02 AM

Lots of claims and scary scenarios, but a total dearth of proof.

Show us one record of one individual from one "hyper-connected" illegal database, and I'll stop considering this article a grandstanding scare tactic to gain readership and clicks.

The author posits a science-fiction "dataverse" where evil powers magically penetrate your Social Security file, credit cards, insurance and med records, your many usernames and passwords and, btw, know all your IP and MAC addresses.

Then they unerringly mash these all together--avoiding the common db mess-ups that plague db adminners worldwide--in a database ten times the size of the IRS's with bigger servers than Google's.

And all to learn that $6/hour Wal-Mart clerk Joe Schmedley bought a bass boat instead of paying his rent.

Sorry, you don't make your case.
0

#8 User is offline   GrossTyro 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 55
  • Joined: 24-January 07

Posted 03 July 2012 - 10:07 AM

View Postjstatum, on 26 June 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

We need to lobby Congress and hire lawyers to represent us against the companies who sell our data and information. I would start with us being able to charge these companies royalties when they use our personal data and or name when they sell the information.

Yes, we need more data laws, tax laws, greed laws, smoking laws, gun laws, child-raising laws, and double-parking laws.
0

#9 User is offline   fwfmfw1 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 23-May 08

Posted 04 July 2012 - 06:51 AM

Good story and then I checked my tracker blocker, seems PC mag has shot 9 trackers my way. We also must understand a new generation of folks not very well educated in right to privacy or such nor overly technical just blundering about saying "What's the big deal?"

View PostGrossTyro, on 03 July 2012 - 10:07 AM, said:

View Postjstatum, on 26 June 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

We need to lobby Congress and hire lawyers to represent us against the companies who sell our data and information. I would start with us being able to charge these companies royalties when they use our personal data and or name when they sell the information.

Yes, we need more data laws, tax laws, greed laws, smoking laws, gun laws, child-raising laws, and double-parking laws.

0

#10 User is offline   aardvarks 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 01-February 11

Posted 05 July 2012 - 07:04 AM

The numbe is 11 according to my tracker blocker. The total number is not in argument, just an observation.

View Postfwfmfw1, on 04 July 2012 - 06:51 AM, said:

Good story and then I checked my tracker blocker, seems PC mag has shot 9 trackers my way. We also must understand a new generation of folks not very well educated in right to privacy or such nor overly technical just blundering about saying "What's the big deal?"

View PostGrossTyro, on 03 July 2012 - 10:07 AM, said:

View Postjstatum, on 26 June 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:

We need to lobby Congress and hire lawyers to represent us against the companies who sell our data and information. I would start with us being able to charge these companies royalties when they use our personal data and or name when they sell the information.

Yes, we need more data laws, tax laws, greed laws, smoking laws, gun laws, child-raising laws, and double-parking laws.


0

#11 User is offline   HA2000 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 10-January 08

  Posted 08 July 2012 - 08:15 PM

Just an observation. Today when I read this informative article and was amazed that 9 people did not think it was worth recommending!
Who might think that?
0

#12 User is offline   Davidd0w2 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 02-July 12

  Posted 16 July 2012 - 09:43 AM

George Orwell was right. He was just off by 20 years. In addition, the biggest threat comes not from government but from so-called private companies (I guess with the Supreme Court Citizens United decision the corporations ARE THE GOVERNMENT - they buy and sell the politicians in their interests only).
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users