Google Nexus 7 Could Heavily Influence The Great Tablet Wars
#1
Posted 27 June 2012 - 05:01 PM
#2
Posted 27 June 2012 - 05:25 PM
#4
Posted 27 June 2012 - 05:53 PM
However, the kindle does have more Apple-like restrictios on where you should go for your content.
#6
Posted 27 June 2012 - 06:10 PM
#8
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:39 AM
#9
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:43 AM
kronoscornelius, on 27 June 2012 - 05:53 PM, said:
However, the kindle does have more Apple-like restrictios on where you should go for your content.
As does the Nook ! Both the Kindle and the Nook are too restrictive and "proprietary" when compared to the 7.
#10
Posted 28 June 2012 - 05:06 AM
#11
Posted 28 June 2012 - 05:07 AM
#12
Posted 28 June 2012 - 05:13 AM
#13
Posted 28 June 2012 - 05:18 AM
#14
Posted 28 June 2012 - 06:24 AM
The failure of past Android tablets have simply been content. Apple has a huge advantage because Apple offers services that go with the hardware and thus the hardware does what most want. Of course it looks good too. But looks don't guarantee sales, ask Samsung.
Amazon who uses a modified version of Android on the Fire and so does B&N with the Nook, have been selling like hotcakes. Not because they run Android specificaly, it si because the OS has been skins with content that centers around the seller.
Other tablets that ran WebOS and Android and BB OS simply didn't offer any content. At the very least they all shoudl have matched the capabilities of the iPad, beyond specs.
Specs don't sell tablets alone, specs sell gaming rigs/laptops.
Looking at this device, it looks liek Google figured that out. But there is still a problem. Even tho Amazon and B/N have had success w/7" tablets, will Google see the same? They seem to think throwing the NExus tag on it will sell it.
Many Nexus fans have said it sucks and they also expected BETER specs? What? Better specs for $200 and less. This si the same mentality the idiots had when they bought netbooks. They expect a notebook that cost $250 to be able to do what a $600 one can do.
Missing SD? What do u need a bigger SD for on this device? The device is designed for viewing content, not saving it. You can READbooks. Even if you download books, the device could literally hold millions of them on the storage it has. Pictures? The device only has a front facing camera. And anywats, how many pictures are you going to take with it? Are you planning on recording videos? If those are features you ant, then you simply shouldn't be looking at thsi device.
Go get an ipad, a G-Tab or similar and you can view much of the same stuff and have your SDcards and fancy GPU's. This is a tablet with purpose pre-determined.
The cost of $199 tells you this device is going to have limitations. How many goon here for $199 expect an ipod Touch to do what an iPad ot iPhone can do? For $199 how many of you expect a netbook to do what a full spec'd laptop can so?.
You are complaining about it not having an SD card slot? What do you need it for? You can store books and docs on the cloud services which is why the device has limited internal storage.
For $200 you expect to have your cake and eat it too. You're lucky you're getting the cake. Instead of looking for wa to much based on the price, most of the post here are people who dont even compalin about platforms that charge to much and give you very little.
For $800, go and compare what a Galaxy S III can do vs and iPhone 4S at the same retail pricing. You will see there is a huge gap.
A Yugo cost $3000. Would you expect it to get from 0-60 in 3 secs? I mean really?
#15
Posted 28 June 2012 - 06:25 AM
Pegleg2007, on 28 June 2012 - 04:39 AM, said:
Hoe many newly announce products have you been able to hold on and use when it is first shown to you? NONE...that's how many. Now chill-lax.
#16
Posted 28 June 2012 - 06:32 AM
JeffStoke, on 28 June 2012 - 05:18 AM, said:
199 vs 299? That's comparable? n extra $100 can get you an sdcard anda slot to put it in.
Again a limited option vs a more open one? One designed to use specific services where youmust be able to bend over and use vs one that os open to that and whatever else you want.
Itsa plain hambuger w/ketchup and mustard vs a whopper with everything on it.
Aain, u get what you are wiliingto pay for. You're asking to much for $199.
#17
#18
Posted 28 June 2012 - 07:54 AM
DonScurlockdh74, on 28 June 2012 - 05:13 AM, said:
I wouldn't go so far as to call them a joke, but they're not as good as the iPad because they're in early development. They're coming along and will surpass the iPad, as the Android phones did to the iPhone and the Symbian phones.
#19
Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:09 AM
NickanFayyazi, on 28 June 2012 - 07:54 AM, said:
DonScurlockdh74, on 28 June 2012 - 05:13 AM, said:
I wouldn't go so far as to call them a joke, but they're not as good as the iPad because they're in early development. They're coming along and will surpass the iPad, as the Android phones did to the iPhone and the Symbian phones.
The main reason why Android is successful is due to the HUGE amounts of cheap crappy phones.
#20
Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:11 AM
Help














