Windows 8 Migration: Why, When And How
#1
Posted 01 July 2012 - 07:00 AM
#2
Posted 01 July 2012 - 10:02 AM
#3
Posted 01 July 2012 - 10:32 AM
In my desktop environment at work where we all us desktops, nearly all the touchscreen features of Windows 8 will just be useless.
Basically what I'm saying is that there should be a Windows 8 version for tablets and desktop/laptop with touchscreens and a version without touchscreen design and features (much like the current Windows 7).
#6
Posted 01 July 2012 - 11:12 AM
LOL! Not going to happen!
Sorry about other posts! Somehow things went haywire!
#7
Posted 01 July 2012 - 11:15 AM
windows 9 will be bad ass.
windows 8 succeeds on a tablet.
thats the bottom line peoples.
#8
Posted 01 July 2012 - 02:54 PM
mikeawbd, on 01 July 2012 - 10:02 AM, said:
That seems odd to think, since the ONLY difference is instead of a start menu (a static list of programs on your machine in text form) you have a start screen - both accessed the same way, except a start screen can group apps of a nature, show real time data (which means maybe you don't even need to open the app unless there is a reason), and be programmed with HTML5.
Hmmm... everything is the same, but the "my programs" area is smarter and more detailed".
Yeah, sounds disruptive.
#9
Posted 01 July 2012 - 05:29 PM
#10
Posted 02 July 2012 - 12:16 AM
#11
Posted 02 July 2012 - 03:21 AM
After using all the windows 8 previews, I don't I want to go back to windows 7. The Metro UI is great and it is going to be the reason why windows 8 will succeed. Users will have some problems at first because of the drastic change but in 3 to 6 months of use it will be the love of everyone.
#12
Posted 02 July 2012 - 10:36 AM
People do not generally respond easily to change, but this is one change I strongly belief will get its adoption faster than other MS OS, would be close to WIN-95 adoption from Win-3.1
#13
Posted 02 July 2012 - 10:37 AM
People do not generally respond easily to change, but this is one change I strongly belief will get its adoption faster than other MS OS, would be close to WIN-95 adoption from Win-3.1
#14
Posted 02 July 2012 - 10:38 AM
People do not generally respond easily to change, but this is one change I strongly belief will get its adoption faster than other MS OS, would be close to WIN-95 adoption from Win-3.1
#15
Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:26 PM
Help












