Windows 8 Lags Windows 7 In Previews
#2
Posted 08 July 2012 - 12:09 PM
Vista was a mess, so Windows users were eager to get a different OS, thus the high number of people who used Windows 7 beta.
Then, windows 7 turned out to be good, if not great, so the people aren't enthusiastic about another one.
That said, I've been using Windows 8 RP as my primary OS for a month now. I skipped DP and CP.
I thought people were exaggerating when they say Metro for desktop sucks.
Come on, it can't be that bad.
Then I get RP. Tell you what, Metro for desktop does really suck. Very inconvenient.
The only "Metro app" I have is desktop. It sits alone in my Start Screen.
I like pretty much everything about Windows 8 (built in SE, faster boot, more control in transferring files) but the metro is a real turn off.
Microsoft, please, listen. With all the competition around you, you can't afford another "Vista".
I'll probably get a Surface, but Windows 7 stays on my desktop.
-----
This comment was written on a desktop using Windows 8 RP, running Firefox. IE10 has issues loading images in my rig. ugh.
This post has been edited by porcupins: 08 July 2012 - 12:21 PM
#3
Posted 08 July 2012 - 12:28 PM
porcupins, on 08 July 2012 - 12:09 PM, said:
I'm still pretty much in your camp. I definitely want either a Surface RT or Transformer 600 (unless something better shows up), and I'm still reluctant to upgrade my desktops. However, I've got more than one desktop to play with and I don't think I'll be able to pass up the forty-buck special when it releases, so one of the desktops is likely to be sacrificed to the gods.
Media Center: Core i3 3220 - Biostar H61 Board - 128GB Plextor SSD - 1TB Samsung HDD - Radeon 4350 - 8GB G.Skill 1333 - Apex DM-387 - Win7 HP 64-bit
#4
Posted 08 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
porcupins, on 08 July 2012 - 12:09 PM, said:
Vista was a mess, so Windows users were eager to get a different OS, thus the high number of people who used Windows 7 beta.
Then, windows 7 turned out to be good, if not great, so the people aren't enthusiastic about another one.
I agree. Win8 isn't bad, it's just that Win7 is that GOOD, even if Vista hadn't been a point of comparison.
This post has been edited by compnovo: 08 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
Media Center: Core i3 3220 - Biostar H61 Board - 128GB Plextor SSD - 1TB Samsung HDD - Radeon 4350 - 8GB G.Skill 1333 - Apex DM-387 - Win7 HP 64-bit
#5
Posted 08 July 2012 - 01:43 PM
#6
Posted 08 July 2012 - 02:13 PM
#9
Posted 08 July 2012 - 03:30 PM
#10
Posted 08 July 2012 - 03:36 PM
MichaelPfeiffer, on 08 July 2012 - 03:08 PM, said:
Vista is not bad. It WAS. As far as Microsoft is concerned, it wasn't the success they were expecting.
Not to mention the stigma it left.
We are talking about product launches here, how the product is able to deliver the moment it ships.
That was what everyone was saying, that Windows Metro might be the new Vista means there is a big possibility that product will fail at launch, make some people angry and disappointed, and hurt Microsoft.
This post has been edited by porcupins: 08 July 2012 - 03:37 PM
#11
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:38 PM
#12
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:28 PM
#13
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:47 PM
Boletusedulis, on 08 July 2012 - 01:43 PM, said:
Or we use it and like it.
#14
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:51 PM
MichaelRousseau, on 08 July 2012 - 05:28 PM, said:
I am with you on that one. I will be buying it for many of my machines.
#15
Posted 08 July 2012 - 06:08 PM
ken1569, on 08 July 2012 - 04:38 PM, said:
It's easy to tell that this is either a paid stooge or a kid. Touchscreens on laptops and desktops are pretty much useless for average general use. Hence, the term "Gorilla Arm". Keyboards and mice are much faster and easier to use on desktops and laptops. On smartphones and tablets, touchscreens are the only way to go. Beyond that, "N'er the twain shall meet." Sorry, all you starry-eyed technophiles, but you've jumped "a bridge too far" this time...
#16
Posted 08 July 2012 - 06:16 PM
The reason for this is that M$ does not WANT anyone to know about it. Their behavior in this "upgrade" very plainly demonstrates that they intend to implement the all-platform Metro UI regardless of what anyone thinks about it. They want to "slam" it onto everyone as quickly and covertly as possible -- because they have absolutely no intentions of going back to the Windows "Legacy" UI. They are expecting a huge number of people to hate it -- and they don't care...
No surprises here....
#17
Posted 08 July 2012 - 06:21 PM
DaenaSmith52zq, on 08 July 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:
Vista was awful in its first version. (Keep in mind that PCW and other IT media expected it to be as wonderful as Win 8.) In it's final version, it's "acceptable" for average end-users -- but not for pros and businesses...
#18
Posted 08 July 2012 - 06:33 PM
waldojim, on 08 July 2012 - 05:51 PM, said:
MichaelRousseau, on 08 July 2012 - 05:28 PM, said:
I am with you on that one. I will be buying it for many of my machines.
Anyone who has posted an average of 9 messages per day, every day, for the past 40+ months (and that's just on PCW) is obviously either a "professional commenter" or a PC enthusiast... Not someone who understands the needs of the *average* end-user, or works with them on a daily basis...
#19
Posted 08 July 2012 - 06:49 PM
#20
Posted 08 July 2012 - 06:54 PM
ronin7752, on 08 July 2012 - 06:33 PM, said:
Or happens to work an off-shift and has lots of free time.
You can hide behind "average user" all you want to. As it stands, my wife is an AVERAGE user, and LOVES Windows 8. When I have friends over, THEY enjoy Windows 8. Given a few minutes to understand what changed. Some didn't even need explanation, they sat down, figured it out within minutes, and loved it. You can HIDE behind any excuse you want to use to hate on it, but in the end YOU are no more qualified to discuss "average" than I am.
Help














