Nokia Lumia 900 Now $50: But Do You Want It?
#1
Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:17 AM
#2
Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:26 AM
Personally, I don't think NFC is widely distributed for everyone to use (CVS is the only place near me that uses it).
Yes, its a great value - not everyone needs all the bells and whistles.
I would get one if I could unlock it, but its currently near impossible.
#3
Posted 16 July 2012 - 05:03 AM
Apparently, the media didn't get that memo and instead are talking about how the sky falling on Nokia.
#4
Posted 16 July 2012 - 05:55 AM
#5
Posted 16 July 2012 - 06:27 AM
AnnePeltier, on 16 July 2012 - 05:03 AM, said:
Apparently, the media didn't get that memo and instead are talking about how the sky falling on Nokia.
Obviously, you have a huge bias because you own the phone. Are you aware of the other smartphones on the market? They have faster processors, better service, more RAM, and much more features. In fact, the Lumia 900, with a 4.2" screen, is still larger than the 4.8" Samsung Galaxy SIII!
And don't get me started on your ignorant abuse of statistics. The vast majority of users?! Try 1.3%. Yep. That's the market share of Windows Phone. By the way, Android is over 51% and iPhone is over 34%. And yes, the sky is (figuratively) falling on Nokia. In 2000, their stock was priced at around $60. In 2007-2008, it was at $40. It is now at $1.83 and is constantly decreasing. So, yes, the media is correct this time.
I don't want to be that harsh, but it frustrates me how many people base their statements on bias and opinion. Try to check your facts first.
#8
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:46 AM
hawaiiinsomniac, on 16 July 2012 - 04:26 AM, said:
Personally, I don't think NFC is widely distributed for everyone to use (CVS is the only place near me that uses it).
Yes, its a great value - not everyone needs all the bells and whistles.
I would get one if I could unlock it, but its currently near impossible.
You can easily get it unlocked. Go to http://fastgsm.com
#9
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:48 AM
Justin429, on 16 July 2012 - 06:33 AM, said:
Dropbox has features that SkyDrive can't match (yet). I use SD because of its generous free storage space. But SD lacks differential backup. Every time I change a file (even just a little bit), the entire file must be re-uploaded to SD. Dropbox will only upload the difference -- meaning much shorter upload time for large files. As well, SD lacks versioning, which can be important to many users.
#11
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:55 AM
NickanFayyazi, on 16 July 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:
AnnePeltier, on 16 July 2012 - 05:03 AM, said:
Apparently, the media didn't get that memo and instead are talking about how the sky falling on Nokia.
Obviously, you have a huge bias because you own the phone. Are you aware of the other smartphones on the market? They have faster processors, better service, more RAM, and much more features. In fact, the Lumia 900, with a 4.2" screen, is still larger than the 4.8" Samsung Galaxy SIII!
And don't get me started on your ignorant abuse of statistics. The vast majority of users?! Try 1.3%. Yep. That's the market share of Windows Phone. By the way, Android is over 51% and iPhone is over 34%. And yes, the sky is (figuratively) falling on Nokia. In 2000, their stock was priced at around $60. In 2007-2008, it was at $40. It is now at $1.83 and is constantly decreasing. So, yes, the media is correct this time.
I don't want to be that harsh, but it frustrates me how many people base their statements on bias and opinion. Try to check your facts first.
Well if Fandroid has over 51% of the market you wont mind this lady singing the Lumia 900's praises now will you? Um, oh, wait, yes you do minmd so it seems, Fandroid alert! Who cares if the fire catching S3 has a dual core (in the USA and quad core in Europe). The plain and simple fact is it's Andoid which is a BLATANT rip off of iOS (may Apple litigate Google to the poor house and they probably will). Also, you forget that there are over 16,000 virus's for Fandoid now and is lollingly the only playform that needs a quality AV on it and that Fandroid users ARE NOT the customer, the Advertisers ARE! So, why would any self respecting phone user want one of those?
This post has been edited by coastie65: 16 July 2012 - 08:56 AM
#12
Posted 16 July 2012 - 08:14 AM
#13
Posted 16 July 2012 - 09:25 AM
Zarniw0Op, on 16 July 2012 - 07:55 AM, said:
NickanFayyazi, on 16 July 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:
AnnePeltier, on 16 July 2012 - 05:03 AM, said:
Apparently, the media didn't get that memo and instead are talking about how the sky falling on Nokia.
Obviously, you have a huge bias because you own the phone. Are you aware of the other smartphones on the market? They have faster processors, better service, more RAM, and much more features. In fact, the Lumia 900, with a 4.2" screen, is still larger than the 4.8" Samsung Galaxy SIII!
And don't get me started on your ignorant abuse of statistics. The vast majority of users?! Try 1.3%. Yep. That's the market share of Windows Phone. By the way, Android is over 51% and iPhone is over 34%. And yes, the sky is (figuratively) falling on Nokia. In 2000, their stock was priced at around $60. In 2007-2008, it was at $40. It is now at $1.83 and is constantly decreasing. So, yes, the media is correct this time.
I don't want to be that harsh, but it frustrates me how many people base their statements on bias and opinion. Try to check your facts first.
Well if Fandroid has over 51% of the market you wont mind this lady singing the Lumia 900's praises now will you? Um, oh, wait, yes you do minmd so it seems, Fandroid alert! Who cares if the fire catching S3 has a dual core (in the USA and quad core in Europe). The plain and simple fact is it's Andoid which is a BLATANT rip off of iOS (may Apple litigate Google to the poor house and they probably will). Also, you forget that there are over 16,000 virus's for Fandoid now and is lollingly the only playform that needs a quality AV on it and that Fandroid users ARE NOT the customer, the Advertisers ARE! So, why would any self respecting phone user want one of those?
I would think most Fandroid's would be quite happy to see MS/Nokia and even BB thrive. The more competition is best for us all what ever platform each of us decide to use. As it is now with iOS and Android releasing every year gives us all new and better systems to enjoy. MS may be able to survive with 1.3% market share given their other products but Nokia is in a really bad place right now. They can not survive with that kind of market share. The same is true of BB and that is a real shame. And btw the fire catching S3 was a hoax; the 16K virus did you actually mean the current Botnet scare by mistake? I believe most security experts now agree it was based on Yahoo servers. Do you believe that iOS and MS systems are secure enough without any protection? As for advertiser's, yes sure I almost always go for the advertisor supported version of an App to test it out and play with it to see if it's what I like and if I'm gonna keep an App I will eventually buy it to get rid of the Ads - hard to see what is wrong with that tactic? As for who ripped off what maybe we can all go back to Palm? I had one of the originals and it was a great product for its time. I believe you can go back even further in time shall we? Sorry Steve, RIP, but you did not invent the smart phone or the mobile phone for that matter.
#14
Posted 16 July 2012 - 09:46 AM
Firstly, it's not a $50 phone, there is 2 years of contract payments to get it at that price ontop.
The Lumia is dated in 2012, it's going to be REALLY dated in 2014.
THAT'S THE REAL PROBLEM. A rubbish phone running a rubbish OS, that's got no future in 2012, is going to be a laughing stock by 2013, let alone 2014.
#15
Posted 16 July 2012 - 09:50 AM
AnnePeltier, on 16 July 2012 - 05:03 AM, said:
Apparently, the media didn't get that memo and instead are talking about how the sky falling on Nokia.
Maybe it is because indeed "the sky is falling on Nokia"!
#16
Posted 16 July 2012 - 10:07 AM
JacobRoggero, on 16 July 2012 - 08:14 AM, said:
Although I agree with you that not having the newest OS for a couple of years is not a big deal, the real issue is that the platform has become obsolete. That means that nobody will be developing anything new for it, and therefore no new apps. Since cell phone contracts in the US are typically 2 years, you will have to be taking a sucker bet that there will be nothing new in tech in the next 2 years that you will want on your cell. I cannot make this call for the next 2 months, never mind 2 years. A year ago, I never thought I would want to run web meetings (Gotomeeting) from my cell phone, now I do it almost daily, and I can get my business done without it. I have tons of similar examples, and there will be many other examples in the future, I am sure.
#17
Posted 16 July 2012 - 10:19 AM
gthia, on 16 July 2012 - 05:55 AM, said:
You are assuming Nokia will still be around making handsets in 2 years. This is no longer a given. They are in a very steep tailspin.
This is a shame, really. I have never seen a company in such a dominant position self destruct so rapidly. 18 months ago, sold 4 times more smartphones than Samsung, and twice as much as Apple. A dumb strategy coupled with a stupid unnecessary memo and 18 months later, and they now sell 4 times less than Samsung and about 3 times less than Apple.
I have never seen a more destructive behavior by an established company - am I the only one shocked nobody in their executives and board has lost their job for this?
#18
Posted 16 July 2012 - 11:38 AM
djjstew, on 16 July 2012 - 09:25 AM, said:
Zarniw0Op, on 16 July 2012 - 07:55 AM, said:
NickanFayyazi, on 16 July 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:
AnnePeltier, on 16 July 2012 - 05:03 AM, said:
Apparently, the media didn't get that memo and instead are talking about how the sky falling on Nokia.
Obviously, you have a huge bias because you own the phone. Are you aware of the other smartphones on the market? They have faster processors, better service, more RAM, and much more features. In fact, the Lumia 900, with a 4.2" screen, is still larger than the 4.8" Samsung Galaxy SIII!
And don't get me started on your ignorant abuse of statistics. The vast majority of users?! Try 1.3%. Yep. That's the market share of Windows Phone. By the way, Android is over 51% and iPhone is over 34%. And yes, the sky is (figuratively) falling on Nokia. In 2000, their stock was priced at around $60. In 2007-2008, it was at $40. It is now at $1.83 and is constantly decreasing. So, yes, the media is correct this time.
I don't want to be that harsh, but it frustrates me how many people base their statements on bias and opinion. Try to check your facts first.
Well if Fandroid has over 51% of the market you wont mind this lady singing the Lumia 900's praises now will you? Um, oh, wait, yes you do minmd so it seems, Fandroid alert! Who cares if the fire catching S3 has a dual core (in the USA and quad core in Europe). The plain and simple fact is it's Andoid which is a BLATANT rip off of iOS (may Apple litigate Google to the poor house and they probably will). Also, you forget that there are over 16,000 virus's for Fandoid now and is lollingly the only playform that needs a quality AV on it and that Fandroid users ARE NOT the customer, the Advertisers ARE! So, why would any self respecting phone user want one of those?
I would think most Fandroid's would be quite happy to see MS/Nokia and even BB thrive. The more competition is best for us all what ever platform each of us decide to use. As it is now with iOS and Android releasing every year gives us all new and better systems to enjoy. MS may be able to survive with 1.3% market share given their other products but Nokia is in a really bad place right now. They can not survive with that kind of market share. The same is true of BB and that is a real shame. And btw the fire catching S3 was a hoax; the 16K virus did you actually mean the current Botnet scare by mistake? I believe most security experts now agree it was based on Yahoo servers. Do you believe that iOS and MS systems are secure enough without any protection? As for advertiser's, yes sure I almost always go for the advertisor supported version of an App to test it out and play with it to see if it's what I like and if I'm gonna keep an App I will eventually buy it to get rid of the Ads - hard to see what is wrong with that tactic? As for who ripped off what maybe we can all go back to Palm? I had one of the originals and it was a great product for its time. I believe you can go back even further in time shall we? Sorry Steve, RIP, but you did not invent the smart phone or the mobile phone for that matter.
Palm didnt either, I think you'll find it's Microsoft that did as the Palm Pilot was not a phone, just a PDA. 1.3% is US market, I realise most US folks think that US market is world market, it aint, in fact SUSA market is small in comparison to say EU, India, China rest of Asia. I know Windows Phone is only faring slightly better there but it is slight improvement. Anyway, who cares who's smartphone ships the most, I don't, I leave that to the Fandroid and iPhan Gestapo to argue the toss about that!
This post has been edited by Zarniw0Op: 16 July 2012 - 11:43 AM
#19
Posted 16 July 2012 - 11:57 AM
As for your going on that ignorant tangent, if you don't see a difference in the way Android and iOS work, you are beyond rational debate. And, please, there are 16,000 reasons for you to stop pulling numbers out of your behind!
[/quote]
Better to pull them from my behind than like you to speak it. Ratioal debate, you only know how to insult! Enjoy your iOS rip off.
This post has been edited by Zarniw0Op: 16 July 2012 - 11:57 AM
#20
Posted 16 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
Help












