[PCWorld]

Post your comments for FXAA Post Process Injector here

[LouIannone]

For ther love of Christ...put a DOWNLOAD BUTTON/LINK on these pages......DOH!

[israelg]

Agreed, or at least the "Product Information" link.

[Tinman1957]

Seriously, why bother with the review if your not even going to tell us where to get it? Just a waste of time from Jim Morris...

[Tinman1957]

And what's with all the Stack Overflows on this page?

[jcolt]

Seriously Jim, why no "download button" or link on any software review's?

http://www.fileplane...jector-Mod-v2.0

[whitevamp]

and for those that are trying to figure out how to down load this or any progy, from reviews do this.
1. click on " View full product specs » "
2. click on the big red button that says " try it for free "
3. wait for your down load to start.
4. if it don't start then click on the blue hyper link text that says " click here. "

[Coasty63]

"and for those that are trying to figure out how to down load this or any progy, from reviews do this."

Good info, but...

Gotta agree with the tone of the first comments on this subject though....

The link "View full product specs" is not what you would call very intuitive for someone looking to download the file, nor is it prominently displayed like it should be. The big red "try it for free' button should be at the top of the articles main page where it can be instantly seen by anybody reading the article.

Basically, the recent make-over of the PC World web site (along with their email articles) suffers from some poor web page design. A little thought on the matter should have told the web page designer what most people would probably be most interested in after reading the article, i.e. downloading it rather then reading product specs that, generally speaking, aren't all that informative. Too much concern over adding more advertising at the expense of readability I suspect. It's one of the ways you lose readers.

[whitevamp]

Quote

"and for those that are trying to figure out how to down load this or any progy, from reviews do this." Good info, but... Gotta agree with the tone of the first comments on this subject though.... The link "View full product specs" is not what you would call very intuitive for someone looking to download the file, nor is it prominently displayed like it should be. The big red "try it for free' button should be at the top of the articles main page where it can be instantly seen by anybody reading the article. Basically, the recent make-over of the PC World web site (along with their email articles) suffers from some poor web page design. A little thought on the matter should have told the web page designer what most people would probably be most interested in after reading the article, i.e. downloading it rather then reading product specs that, generally speaking, aren't all that informative. Too much concern over adding more advertising at the expense of readability I suspect. It's one of the ways you lose readers.

i do have to agree with what you said.

[anthonydagostino]

It is amazing to me, that every time I read a link on the new interface, there are comments about the pathetic way the site has been redesigned. It is set up as a guessing game, which I believe is absolutely intentional. They want you to click on adverts, not download links, so they have obscured them.

They probably get a certain amount of money, per redirect, and have thrown the readers to the wolves, in favor of revenue by mis-clicks.

I have stopped coming to pcworld as my main source, because of this horrible page layout, believing they knew exactly what the results would be.