Windows 8: The Official Review
#2
Posted 25 October 2012 - 02:39 AM
It's free, Loverock, unlike Windows trash!
#3
Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:18 AM
Quote
It's only "free" if your time is worth nothing, and I'm perfectly prepared to believe that _your_ time is worthless, you ignoramus.
#4
Posted 25 October 2012 - 05:14 AM
#5
Posted 25 October 2012 - 05:15 AM
I agree that Windows 8 isn't for everyone-especially desktop users running Windows 7 without any problems-but for those who are curious about the new OS they should give it a try.
#6
Posted 25 October 2012 - 05:31 AM
#7
Posted 25 October 2012 - 05:43 AM
#8
Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:32 AM
Quote
Saying that Windows is trash is a bit annoying because people have done and do great things with this operating system every day. Things that benefit YOU even if you're on Ubuntu. (Think of all the websites you visit that someone created while in Windows). You should respect it's existence even if it's not what you use personally.
#9
Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:32 AM
#10
Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:40 AM
Quote
Yeah, I installed the Release Preview and started using it as my main daily OS. I found more to love about it every day, and eventually I had pretty much decided to stick with it, and probably upgrade when it releases.
Then I found out that it won't run Minecraft.
I've used Windows 7 ever since.
#11
Posted 25 October 2012 - 07:11 AM
Quote
Yup, free but next to useless.
Until companies start releasing pro apps for linux, it's not worth the headache.
#12
Posted 25 October 2012 - 07:51 AM
Anyway, I booted up my old IBM running Windows 3.0 and was struck by the familiar screen that popped up after boot. Seems to me Microsoft took 5 steps back on the default UI:

Windows 8 - definitely NOT my idea!
This post has been edited by HanokOdbrook: 25 October 2012 - 08:07 AM
#13
Posted 25 October 2012 - 07:54 AM
HanokOdbrook, on 25 October 2012 - 07:51 AM, said:
Anyway, I booted up my old IBM running Windows 3.0 and was struck by the familiar screen that popped up after boot. Seems to me Microsoft took 5 steps back on the default UI:

So much for innovation!
Yes!
Cause those two look sooo much alike...
#14
Posted 25 October 2012 - 08:09 AM
KLanD, on 25 October 2012 - 07:54 AM, said:
HanokOdbrook, on 25 October 2012 - 07:51 AM, said:
Anyway, I booted up my old IBM running Windows 3.0 and was struck by the familiar screen that popped up after boot. Seems to me Microsoft took 5 steps back on the default UI:

So much for innovation!
Yes!
Cause those two look sooo much alike...
Oh yeah, sorry about that - 3.0 is in black and white while Win8 has color. That makes all the difference! I can take a pic of 3.1 and add a clutter of icons if that helps you out any.
This post has been edited by HanokOdbrook: 25 October 2012 - 08:10 AM
#15
Posted 25 October 2012 - 08:58 AM
I like the thought behind the Metro interface. It's clean and tiles are updated and easy to work with. The "desktop" is ok. I don't like that some functionality has been stripped to accommodate Metro.
Anyone who is a Right-Click ***** (like me) will initially be quite annoyed. It's like learning to be a lefty when you do everything as a righty. You'll find yourself in the Vista mindset all over again. The ol' "Where the hell is everything?"
I've noticed myself having many...many brain freezes. As in " I know what I want to do, now how the hell do I do it?" or "How do I do what I just did...again?"
I do like IE10. I like the layout & content of information via News/Sports. There seems to be quite a few more options in the file windows. Similar to Office's ribbon feature.
I've only been tinkering with it for about 2 days. I have it running in a virtual environment so I can easily tuck my tail between my legs and crawl back to Windows 7 when my ego gets bruised.
#16
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:22 AM
#17
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:32 AM
HanokOdbrook, on 25 October 2012 - 08:09 AM, said:
Using that logic - EVERY OS since Windows 3.0 is just like it...
Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png
#18
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:41 AM
Quote
Oh yeah, sorry about that - 3.0 is in black and white while Win8 has color. That makes all the difference! I can take a pic of 3.1 and add a clutter of icons if that helps you out any. Using that logic - EVERY OS since Windows 3.0 is just like it...
I wish I could click "recommend" like 30 times. Windows 8's start screen looks less like his Win 3.0 picture than just about every OS ever invented. Even iOS looks more like it than Windows 8. Some people are so desperate to bash Windows 8 that I believe they lose their grip on reality.
#19
Posted 25 October 2012 - 09:43 AM
Quote
Honest, fair and unbiased, what a revelation! Thank you HomeSlice!
#20
Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:27 AM
Help













