The only issue I have with these projects, is trying to classify them. I end up with all this crap under tech talk because it really doesn't fit well into other places. Anyhow, here goes.
This project is a bit more "simplistic" than my other projects. Namely, in that it isn't nearly as grandiose. What I lose in flare, I hope to make up for in practicality. Today, I want to discuss wifi antenna, how to make your own, where to find decent information and discuss what works and what does not. The bright side here, is that there is a LOT of flexibility in this project. The downside, is that radio work (of any kind) can get expensive quickly. So I will take you down the road needed to do this as cheaply as possible. Understanding that once more, I am a cheapskate at heart. As of right now, the project is incomplete, but very much in progress - and necessary. I will be discussing not only how to make it work, but how practical it REALLY is. I intend to find not just signal numbers from my equipment, but also get throughput testing done, as well as pinpoint additional delays. The goal here, will be to see if this can be practical for people in need of real range.
So, first up, the setup. I have 2 WRT 54G routers. They are old. They are finicky. And now, they run Linux. Sadly, I am stuck using the micro build on one of them, as it is an oddball version with a 2MBeeprom. In any event I will attempt to use the V5 router for now, though it will be on its way to Ohio as soon as the first round is done. The goal here, is to get this router to communicate with another router about 500meters away. Excessive speeds are not needed, in fact a rate of 11Mb/sec would be more than enough for this discussion, though I will of course, be trying to much more.
A quick bit of poking around on the internet turns up a few obvious places to start, namely the Pringles can-tenna. What you will find out in the end, is that the cantenna is A| too short for practical use, and B| actually a very complex Yagi style antenna. These are excellent directional antenna, but due to the limited space of the can, relatively ill equipped for the target goal. So for now, we will be discussing a wave guide style antenna.
So during my research I found a website that I would love to credit with 99.9% of the information that I will discuss about the antenna itself: Turnpoint.net
That site was used to develop the idea, and give me hard numbers to use for the project. They do, however, leave out an important detail: the cable. That will come up shortly.
Understand, that for now, I will NOT be using Type N for my RF connections. Firstly, because I don't really care if it is a standard connection, and secondly because I want to be able to run a few tests later on using a scope or two. For these reasons I will be using a BNC connection on the can. For obvious reasons, I am forced to use an RPTNC connection on the router end. Double check your gear before you buy ANY connectors/cables.
Important note: The wifi routers sold use a non-standard connection for a reason! This is to comply with FCC regulations regarding part 15 rules. Namely that you cannot transmit more than 1 watt peak to peak power. A modified antenna WILL change this number! For more details regarding the power limitations, see here. The FCC does allow limited unlicensed "testing". However, I will be broadcasting using my amateur radio station license during these test, and you will see my equipment identified as such. As a result of my licensed testing, I will not be testing for encryption verification. so remember that all these numbers will exclude WAP2 protections. Sorry, but that is how it goes sometimes.
OK, on to the nitty gritty. First off, the can itself is not all that important. Just find a can that is about 3.3" in diameter. I am using a pair of HUNTS Pasta Sauce cans. They are about 3.25" in diameter, and roughly 6" long. These seem to be about the cheapest cans I could find (about $1 each!). Open only one end. That is important, and we will discuss why later (it is safe to say, I already screwed this up!
Then comes the cable. This is where it gets interesting - at least for me. Looking above, we can make a pair of antenna for about $10 total. That right there can easily replace $100 in commercial products! But what about the cabling? Do you really need to spend $50 on a 30ft cable to run from your router to the antenna? I say no. I am working on the feed line right now, but understand that different cable types have very different properties. Generally speaking, RG8X would be the preferred cable - and keep it short! RG58 can be used as well (and will be what I test with initially). DO NOT use RG59 OR RG6. Those are impedance matched to 75 ohms, not 50. As such, you will likely damage your equipment! The last option I want to mention is LMR400. Without 'n' type connections on both ends, I wouldn't mess with this. Also, this would be used more for LONG runs, meaning more than a few feet - and for permanent installations. It has FAR LESS LOSS than either cable type I will be using - but is more difficult to work with. Remember to be very careful in buying your connectors, to ensure they are the right polarity AND for the right type of cable. In the end, my basic set of cables will end up costing about $20 for the pair at 12ft long. This should result in a cable with about 3.2db loss.
Pictures, test results, and additional details will come in the next day or two. Requests will also be taken.
Help














