Page 1 of 1
Convicted Music Pirate Asks Supreme Court To Review Case
#1
Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:43 AM
Post your comments for Convicted music pirate asks Supreme Court to review case here
#2
Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:58 AM
Cara Duckworth, a spokeswoman for the RIAA said the trade group had no comment on the petition. "But I'd note on background that Tenenbaum's petition for cert was denied by the Supreme Court."
Don't you guys understand what "background" means?
Don't you guys understand what "background" means?
#3
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:10 AM
If I were the sued part, I would say "Make me pay". It's all about logic, no country regardless the laws have enough space to keep real criminals and entire comunity of copyright infringment. And once again I ask. Would RIAA try this in Brazil? And the answer is "Hahahahahahaha"
#4
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:53 AM
interesting but netflix violates copyright or infringement every second of the day, half of the music and movie industry should be happy somebody priate the crappy stuff some of them put out computer generated vocals and sounds then when u hear them live damn good thing they play the music loud,outside of the lyrics damn, i purchased a oldie from both amazon and googgle for an artist thats bee deceased for over 20 years @ 99cents the whole cd would have been 9.99 i brought the album in 1975 for less than 3.99 the industry just grab and grab and bitch most people got their internet for p2p
#5
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:53 AM
Quote
If I were the sued part, I would say "Make me pay". It's all about logic, no country regardless the laws have enough space to keep real criminals and entire comunity of copyright infringment. And once again I ask. Would RIAA try this in Brazil? And the answer is "Hahahahahahaha"
You wouldn't need to say "Make me pay" You would have a judgement against you for your criminal activities, allowing them (rightfully and legally) to garnish your wages and tax refunds, levy your bank accounts, and prevent you from getting credit. What, do you think you can thumb your nose at the legal system because you feel like it? That's as naive as thinking you can make copies of copyrighted media and distribute them without paying the legally required fees.
#6
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:55 AM
besides you pay your isp big bucks for slow service and they just laughing all the way to the bank...
#7
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:20 AM
Quote
besides you pay your isp big bucks for slow service and they just laughing all the way to the bank...
You may do that, but I don't. Why pay them? Switch carriers or make them take charges off your bill. I do. It's not that hard.
#8
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:24 AM
Quote
...the whole cd would have been 9.99 i brought the album in 1975 for less than 3.99...
Um, $3.99 in 1975 equals $16.78 today with inflation. $9.99 is a better deal (or have you never heard of inflation?).
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
Help











