PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Booting Linux Via Uefi Can 'brick' Some Samsung Laptops - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Booting Linux Via Uefi Can 'brick' Some Samsung Laptops

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,810
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:20 PM

Post your comments for Booting Linux via UEFI can 'brick' some Samsung laptops here
0

#2 User is offline   waldojim 

  • Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15,083
  • Joined: 29-October 08
  • Location:Texas

Posted 31 January 2013 - 07:39 PM

At first I saw the headline and though and yet another person misuses the word "bricked", glad I read the article. Now I am just glad that the machine I have doesn't brick that easy!
"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" -- Isaac Asimov
Spoiler
0

#3 User is offline   Dekaw 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 54
  • Joined: 13-May 11

  Posted 31 January 2013 - 08:59 PM

Classic example of what happens when hardware manufacturers don't give any thought to the idea that someone might want to do something besides default software.
0

#4 User is offline   eemail 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 24-April 12

  Posted 01 February 2013 - 03:26 AM

if linux is not uefi ready , its too primitive
0

#5 User is offline   bringthetech 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 01-February 13

  Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:06 AM

I have triple booted my Samsung laptop but created the boot menu from my Windows partition with no problem. I did call Samsung before I started partitioning so I could make any bios changes if needed to. I tried from a live USB which it would not boot to until I changed the bios sequence. But best to start from Windows.

I tried reverse order, loading Linux and then Windows but that was a problem. Never once bricked my Samsung laptop. What I do like about Samsung tech support they did not try to discourage partitioning but were very helpful. Dell once told me not to do it they don't support dual booting.
0

#6 User is offline   oldschoolh4ck3r 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 880
  • Joined: 11-January 09

  Posted 01 February 2013 - 11:58 PM

Shame on Samsung, for not providing a recovery option.

UEFI's 'Protected Boot'... protecting Microsoft's profits, not your PC. This is what happens when a monopolistic software company colludes with hardware makers to create such a 'feature'. Designing firmware to embed Windows activation keys, instituting a 'Windows key' on all keyboards, crippling the benefits of UEFI with 'protected boot' requiring a signed OS (of which Microsoft clearly has the advantage)... what next? Microsoft has taken the IBM PC compatible standard and tainted it to serve their closed-source, proprietary business model.

I'm interested in learning of hardware designed with open-source in mind, with no Microsoft 'features'.
---
Abort, Retry, Epic Fail? _
1

#7 User is offline   waldojim 

  • Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15,083
  • Joined: 29-October 08
  • Location:Texas

Posted 02 February 2013 - 01:02 AM

View Posteemail, on 01 February 2013 - 03:26 AM, said:

if linux is not uefi ready , its too primitive

Based on Samsung products being screwed up? If this effected more laptops on a regular basis, you would have a point. As it is, you sound retarded, pointing fingers at the wrong people.
"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" -- Isaac Asimov
Spoiler
0

#8 User is offline   waldojim 

  • Elite
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15,083
  • Joined: 29-October 08
  • Location:Texas

Posted 02 February 2013 - 01:04 AM

View Postoldschoolh4ck3r, on 01 February 2013 - 11:58 PM, said:

Shame on Samsung, for not providing a recovery option.

UEFI's 'Protected Boot'... protecting Microsoft's profits, not your PC. This is what happens when a monopolistic software company colludes with hardware makers to create such a 'feature'. Designing firmware to embed Windows activation keys, instituting a 'Windows key' on all keyboards, crippling the benefits of UEFI with 'protected boot' requiring a signed OS (of which Microsoft clearly has the advantage)... what next? Microsoft has taken the IBM PC compatible standard and tainted it to serve their closed-source, proprietary business model.

I'm interested in learning of hardware designed with open-source in mind, with no Microsoft 'features'.

Secure boot isnt the problem. Care to try again?
"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" -- Isaac Asimov
Spoiler
0

#9 User is offline   bringthetech 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 01-February 13

  Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:21 AM

Quote

Shame on Samsung, for not providing a recovery option. UEFI's 'Protected Boot'... protecting Microsoft's profits, not your PC. This is what happens when a monopolistic software company colludes with hardware makers to create such a 'feature'. Designing firmware to embed Windows activation keys, instituting a 'Windows key' on all keyboards, crippling the benefits of UEFI with 'protected boot' requiring a signed OS (of which Microsoft clearly has the advantage)... what next? Microsoft has taken the IBM PC compatible standard and tainted it to serve their closed-source, proprietary business model. I'm interested in learning of hardware designed with open-source in mind, with no Microsoft 'features'.


They do come with recovery option. However these greedy American companies (MS, now Google--Jellybean was loaded with trackers from Google--playstore, maps, youtube, gmail & general account settings) are taking cues from Apple trying to lock users into their ecosystems. Thank goodness for developers, hackers and techies. We can always find a work-around. Bricked a phone & tablet but never bricked a laptop. That would be stunning.
0

#10 User is offline   bringthetech 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 01-February 13

  Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:23 AM

Quote

Classic example of what happens when hardware manufacturers don't give any thought to the idea that someone might want to do something besides default software.


That's not the case with Samsung. You can call tech support and tell them what evasive measures you want to take and they will help you achieve it. These people should have called tech support first. They are English speaking, Americans, located in the US, also consumers and they get some don't want the out-the-box experience.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users