PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Facebook Sued Over 'like' Button By Dutch Programmer's Family - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Facebook Sued Over 'like' Button By Dutch Programmer's Family

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,804
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 12 February 2013 - 07:49 AM

Post your comments for Facebook sued over 'Like' button by Dutch programmer's family here
0

#2 User is offline   redeyeguy 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 24-January 13

  Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:56 PM

This is an idea not an invention. Patent courts are highly biased and usually uneducated on the patent system. This has become a plague in our country where people are able to secure large amounts of assets with no effort. This is something that seriously has to be reevaluated in this country. The biggest concerns are the energy companies. It's ridiculous that you can patent technology to purposely keep it out of the consumers hands.
0

#3 User is offline   change28 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 12-February 13

  Posted 12 February 2013 - 11:41 PM

This is stupid and a completely frivolous case!
0

#4 User is offline   Follisimo0smi 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 51
  • Joined: 17-May 11

  Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:29 AM

I hope they win. Social media is full of trash.
0

#5 User is offline   Szczecinianin 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 325
  • Joined: 12-January 11
  • Location:Szczecin, Poland

  Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:30 AM

This only proves it's hard to be innovative and innovations are often inventing gunpowder as Poles say.
0

#6 User is offline   creativity 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 05-March 13

  Posted 05 March 2013 - 01:57 PM

I find redeyeguy's comments unconvincing. Anyone who has ever tried to create something valuable and bring it to life know that such creativity is very hard work. The "no effort" comment is uninformed. I have read Van Der Meer's patents and find them remarkably creative and detailed. They are not something that was done on the back of a napkin. Why does one get the impression that those who trash inventions are the ones who want to steal them? Problem is, if creativity is so "no effort", then why don't more people create? Takers and givers. Creators and consumers. There is a place for all. It's time for the takers and the consumers to stop trashing the givers and the creators. You need us. The economy needs us. But what is the point if the takers, consumers and trashers just steal everything? In the end you'll just be wallowing in a garbage pile for the scraps of what is left of the theft-society that you leave behind.
0

#7 User is offline   WinTard 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,513
  • Joined: 16-January 09
  • Location:Look behind you...

Posted 05 March 2013 - 02:57 PM

View Postcreativity, on 05 March 2013 - 01:57 PM, said:

I find redeyeguy's comments unconvincing. Anyone who has ever tried to create something valuable and bring it to life know that such creativity is very hard work. The "no effort" comment is uninformed. I have read Van Der Meer's patents and find them remarkably creative and detailed. They are not something that was done on the back of a napkin. Why does one get the impression that those who trash inventions are the ones who want to steal them? Problem is, if creativity is so "no effort", then why don't more people create? Takers and givers. Creators and consumers. There is a place for all. It's time for the takers and the consumers to stop trashing the givers and the creators. You need us. The economy needs us. But what is the point if the takers, consumers and trashers just steal everything? In the end you'll just be wallowing in a garbage pile for the scraps of what is left of the theft-society that you leave behind.


While I find your comments unconvincing. If what you say were true, then there would be no Open-Source at all. There would be no Linux either, since implementing whatever Unix does by 'reverse-engineering' the functionality would be considered illegal as well.

Instead I look forward, and am not interested in personal self-gains; but more looking towards what is good for the whole of Humanity.

Please read some of these topics, then come back to discuss your views and opinions?
http://www.neowin.ne...e2%80%99-ideas/
Posted Image

http://www.theverge....t-of-innovation
Posted Image

View PostWinTard, on 28 February 2013 - 02:52 PM, said:

View Posteoraptor2, on 27 February 2013 - 04:49 PM, said:

And what would SHIELD accomplish? The whole patent trolling ecosystem is geared to swarm someone under with the threat of legal action, or actual legal action, until they capitulate and pay license fees off to the troll, or give up their innovation to the troll. Since there is rarely a judgement issued on the validity of a patent except at the highest levels, this law would do nothing.


Except that anything is better than what this ridiculous situation is now:

Those freaking patent trolls are the lowest-of-the-low parasites of society:
Posted Image

This new SHIELD bill would instill some Fear Of God into these kinds of vermin.
http://yro.slashdot....utm_medium=feed
Posted Image

~~~~~~~~~~~
Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished.
~ Lao Tzu

How strange that nature does not knock, and yet does not intrude!
~ Emily Dickinson, 1830-1886, American Poet

Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.

That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.


Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property.
~ Thomas Jefferson


Disclaimer: This is just my humble opinion -- In a free world, is everyone is entitled to their own opinions?
Spoiler
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users