Vista Resistance: Why XP Is Still So Strong
#81
Posted 01 October 2007 - 10:37 AM
#82
Posted 01 October 2007 - 10:47 AM
#83
Posted 01 October 2007 - 10:54 AM
#84
Posted 01 October 2007 - 11:30 AM
As for incompatable programs, Microsoft has published for more than a decade the recommend handing of video, memory access for system. Programmer ignored it because it was a little faster to go straight to the memory and video registers. Now, however, that MS has finally closed the back door in the name of security because the kernel has the control, those ill written programs won't run. However, programs that were written to the standards do run. I have some fourteen year old programs that one would not expect to run, but do because they were properly written. If the program doesn't run, don't blame Microsoft and Vista, blame the writers of the programs.
Kind of like the guy who go stopped for speeding - when stopped he blamed the cop - said he'd been speeding for years, and now they stop me. Duh!
One thing that will help most of the systems is to get rid of McAfee and Symantec and go to individual layered programs. If you are not careful, Symantec and McAfee will take over your system, and you can't use the Windows Add/Remove to remove Symantec programs, you have to download their tool.
#85
Posted 01 October 2007 - 12:28 PM
But you give me the opportunity to speak. For one, I was stuck with Norton ani-virus, which I would not choose. Also, I use Total Recorder 6.1 mp3 recording software which will not run on Vista.
None of these incompatibility problems are the fault of Microsoft. All of the third party vendors mhad five years to get ready for Vista. None of them have any excuse for being late.
Regarding periferals, my HP 5150 and 5650 Deskjets which I have had since I believe WinME, installed fine with all bells and whistles from the original CD's. My Epson 3670 scanner at first would only run on the generic Microsoft provided driver. But within about a month of my computer purchase, Epson updated the driver.
Firefox, SeaMonkey and Netscape 9 run fine. Winamp and RealPlayer 11 run fine. All of these folks did their jobs. Ad-Aware just came on board last week. Adobe Reader works, Roboform works, BOINC and WCG for crunching ( you are all crunching, right?) all run with no problems. Even my old Judy's Tenkey calculator program runs fine. What's left? Picasa and Google Earth, Google Desktop Search.
I am a happy camper.
>>RSM
#86
Posted 01 October 2007 - 12:38 PM
#87
Posted 01 October 2007 - 12:52 PM
In addition, many online friends report severe compatibility issues with our favorite programs (Paint Shop Pro) and it just is not worth it to me.
My next machine will probably have XP - I'm comfortable with it and don't need any new hassles. When Win95 came out, I was in line at midnight! When XP came out, I bought it ASAP. I had to do an upgrade to my computer for XP, but to have to buy a completely new machine to accommodate the upgrade to VIsta is just too much.
Message was edited by: renata77
#88
Posted 01 October 2007 - 12:54 PM
#89
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:08 PM
#90
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:10 PM
I troubleshoot computer problems for a living and had to learn Vista. I did not have the latest, greatest processor or video when I installed the beta 1 and had no problems with any version thereafter. Yes, it is different than XP. No, it is not any more a memory hog than XP was. I ran dual boot until the retail version and still most programs run faster in Vista than they did in XP.
Yes, Vista does have a compatibility mode for those programs that need it, no, you don't need the vista version of Every program (I still use Office XP)
The only complaint I have with Vista is that I am forced to use MediaPlayer11 for the DRM.
#92
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:15 PM
I saw that happen with XP when it first came out and bought into it. Of course part of the scorn of XP was the Activation concept, it really was fodder for the grist mill. If they had this forum then, it would have been scorched. The result was that when I bought my HP D530 desktop in late 2003 and it came with XP Pro, I replaced the HD and installed Windows 2000 Pro. It was nowhere as user friendly as 98SE or XP, so about 7 months later I put the original HD back in and Activated XP. A lot of the same things that are being said about Vista were said then about XP - it's unstable, Blue Screens all the time, no programs would run on it, drivers were not available, etc. Most of which I discovered later was false, and the XP and 2K drivers are in most cases the same. Well written programs would run, and I have yet to get a BSOD in XP Pro, Home, or the three installations of Vista I now have.
But, then I don't play any high end games, and don't download a lot of "super duper" must have utilities.
The one OS I had the most trouble with was XP MCE that came pre-installed on my HP Media Center. It later was the beneficiary of a free Vista Home Premium upgade from HP. I blame most of my problems on Symantec which I should have taken off on day one. There are a lot of similaities to the graphics on MCE and Vista, the rounded corners on the windows, and the face that the frame becomes translucent when you move it. If I had found stability with MCE and had sidebar, I probably would not have installed the upgrade.
Of course everytime we go though an upgrade, people expect their current software to run without problems, and some of it is so poorly finished it barely runs on the old OS.
But enjoy MCE, I probably gave up on it too early, but I like my Vista. When I walk into my office at home I have my choice of booting up my XP Pro machine or Vista machine and almost all the time its the Vista machine. When I need a second machine to do something, I then boot up my XP machine.
#93
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:17 PM
#95
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:21 PM
#96
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:24 PM
#97
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:25 PM
#99
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:28 PM
Point is, there needs to be more REAL competition, but that will never happen as long as Microsoft is still in business. IE is one of the most pervasive viruses aside from anything AOL. Mozilla is the only one I see making a dent in browsers/email. I use Firefox religiously. At least it's a start.
And as far as OS's, I'm anxious to see what Google might be coming out with. Until then, I'm sticking with XP.
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
- MSN/Bing
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote
