Microsoft's Copy Protection:Time to Mend It--Or End It
#2
Posted 27 September 2007 - 02:58 AM
#4
Posted 03 October 2007 - 08:28 AM
#5
Posted 05 October 2007 - 04:27 AM
The problem is, however, you journalists and us commenting consumers aren't likely to effect any change because none of it is going to put a greater dent in MS's profits than the piracy to which they perceive they are losing money. In other words, if they think they are losing more money to piracy than they stand to lose from grumblers like us dumping Windows for some other OS, they will simply stay the current course.
Microsoft is a stockholder-owned company; you own enough stock and you'll get behind WGA too...folks want that MONEY!
Sad, but true.
#6
Posted 05 October 2007 - 07:53 PM
Microsoft will bust their their own monopoly and sink their own company through this exact practice. This is how all monopolies have gone bust. Microsoft executives should read up on history. Also, when amy parasite becomes to too aggressive it simply does itself in...
#7
Posted 05 October 2007 - 11:39 PM
My argument is this: IF MS wants to protect its legal rights, please do it with 100% certainty 24/7 (364 and quarter days a year, no adjustment for leap year please) or money back gurantee. Simple, eh. Fair?
Why can't MS have a business model like acrobat reader, that differentiate between individual users and corporate users. As individuals, we do not utilize the many bloated features of most softwares and still have to pay, pay and pay for endless upgrades, and worst still, prevented from upgrading for other peoples mistakes, (interpreted MS).
Think about it MS. It's good business advise. And it's FREE, too. NO CHARGE at all.
#8
Posted 06 October 2007 - 09:04 PM
It is extremely difficult to get Microsoft to solve the problem that they created, free of charge, even when dealing with the UK Escalation Team and the Indian Technicians responsible for the UK.
I think that if Microsoft and other companies were prosecuted - including for HDMI and HDCP by Sony etcetera at least one hundred million pounds for each offence committed - editors covering problems should also be prosecuted - conspiracy - soon solve problems.
Prosecute the CEOs also would solve the speeding-up of numerous problems faced by consumers.
Consumers should receive proper compensations by culprits also.
#9
Posted 07 October 2007 - 12:14 AM
#10
Posted 07 October 2007 - 10:58 AM
The purpose it appear is to sell more products.
For example, the attitude of too many staff is to tell the consumer either to upgrade, buy a replacement product or pay for the culprits to solve the problems created by their own anti-piracy softwares.
Then there are too many editors instead of properly investigating promote the false propaganda by the culprits.
I think that Sony admitted that one of the problems with reduced sells were not entirely, because of piracy, but that the DVD cases were too big and retailers and consumers were running out of storage space that is why some DVD cases were and are bein made narrower.
The prinicple problem with having an Apple Computer is that too many software packages don't work with Apple.
#11
Posted 07 October 2007 - 11:16 AM
Referring to web page:-
http://www.pcworld.com/article/vote/id,138125/thanks.html
Verifies also that Microsoft would not be allowing people with pirated copy to use IE 7 (Internet Explorer 7) browser if it was actully there principal to fight pirates - and also I think that claims of piracy are substantially exagerrated.
It was possible for me to prove that none of my software were pirated:-
1) Microsoft UK Escalation Team contacted my computer manufacturer.
2) Microsoft in Germany who deals with replacing faulty disks, actually supplied with discs.
3) Indian technicians eventually after about a year stated that the disks were illegal. I think that on the disk it stated not for OEM or retail use/ sale. This is despite that I was given replacement Key Registration Codes, because Microsoft anti-piracy software changed the keys probably after formatting C: or installing certain software programs.
Consumers should be compensated properly
#12
Posted 08 October 2007 - 02:22 PM
we're going to be hearing about Harrassment Lawsuits From the constant validation process. Like someone said, you only Let a policeman Pull you over so many times before being a lagitimite case for harrassment...Right. Oh boy!! i can't wait for that day.
That will be an article to read....LOL
#14
Posted 09 October 2007 - 03:19 AM
Microsoft is trying to milk its cash cow before it dies -- the cash cow, not Microsoft. With Apple competing on quality and Linux/OpenOffice competing on price, Microsoft knows their two main products -- Windows and Office -- will become commodities.
And, as any strategy text book will tell you, "cash cows exhibit a return on assets that is greater than the market growth rate, and thus generate more cash than they consume. Such business units should be "milked", extracting the profits and investing as little cash as possible".
Since they know the cash cow is dying, they must get the maximum return, as soon as possible.
The conundrum is: if they force too much, the cash cow dies erlier; if they leave piracy rampant, they won't get all the return they can.
#15
Posted 16 October 2007 - 09:07 PM
i am so sick of re-verifying my vista is real. i have at least 15 msgs from microsux & 11 calls. i'm bedridden & terminal and they are worried about the disabled access & problems with vista genuine & UAC. their customer vista relations dept called today and asked about WGa & UAC they wanted my feedback. i asked then if they wanted the truth they said yes so i gave it t em.
some of what i said reguarding WGA it sucks and since july i asked how 2 stop it from consistently saying this vista may not be genuine. i aslo told em my 15 yeasr old could do better (he can so can i) microsoft to me is microsux u should fire the entire staff and start fresh. ofcourse they wont. - i told em lost more in very unpleasent langauge. wonder will they call me tomorrow too.
#16
Posted 06 November 2007 - 05:38 AM
#17
Posted 06 November 2007 - 08:38 AM
There is also the option to phone activate Windows either version. They will ask you for a product key and ask you for a set of numbers supplied by the activation window, and then check to see if you have the software installed on other computers. If you dont they will issue you a confirmation number that will tie windows to your computer from then on out. Personally I just switched over to the mac, i do however run Windows on the side via Parrallels Desktop or BootCamp which ever you prefer is up to you. And i had to use the same windows disc that i used for my pc on my mac. However i did uninstall Vista off my pc to use on the mac and load xp on it. If you need help email me at chastx81@mac.com and i will discuss other ways to help you.
Thanks
#19
Posted 07 December 2007 - 05:36 PM
If Microsoft learns how to copy MAC OS's features in Vista, how come Apple does not learn Microsoft's marketing stratgery?
I think Steve Jobs is stupid and does not know much about free enterprise
#20
Posted 07 December 2007 - 07:10 PM
Go OSS, go Linux !
I've just gone there and U know what, it's a fantastic
world out there. U never regret. U got nothing to lose
if u find you dont like it. U can always switch back
to Windows or if U like Mac.
Give it a try, will U ? No risk. Just time, effort and
lots of patience and a passion to explore !
U'll thank me for this advice.
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote