Vista Is Still Plagued by Incompatibilities
#81
Posted 26 October 2007 - 01:04 PM
You people all know M$ is charging an outrageous fee to get drivers "Vista Certified" right? Does anyone think that may be part of the problem?
I have Vista because I have to
I am still waiting for someone to tell me, or show me why this is an upgrade?
What does it do better, faster, or less expensive than XP.....
And why did M$ move all the controls around?
To make you think you are getting something new? A GUI is a GUI....
And do not give me the more stable and more secure BS because that's what that is BS I have had Vista freeze more than my XP ever has BTW on the same hardware (different PC's)
And what's with the 7 different versions? Talk about consumer confusion. That alone is the biggest bunch of BS I have ever seen in this industry, lately.
So all you Vista lovers please enlighten me as to what makes it so great.
FYI I just downloaded UBUNTU 7.10 lets see how that runs...Ron
#85
Posted 26 October 2007 - 01:22 PM
You like XP, I like Vista, Joe Shmoe likes OS-X, Billy Bob likes Ubuntu, Fred Flintstone likes MS-DOS. Yada yada yada.
I'm tired of arguing about Vista. The fact is this: Vista will eventually supplant XP in both the home and the workplace, then when Windows 7 comes out we will all get to listen to the whining and complaining all over again, so you kow what, I am done discussing Vista with the haters altogether. It's here, get used to it.
And that's about all I have to say on the subject. Next article please...
#88
Posted 26 October 2007 - 01:38 PM
I've asked it over and over
One person actually suggested they "finally arranged control panel" and I thought control panel, how often do you go into control panel and who cares???
When 95 came out I upgraded at version B, then C, 98, 98se skipped ME and 2000 ( except server ) XP was NT 5.1 and it worked and ran faster on the same hardware.
So yes I am sure there are people out there that hate the latest M$ OS, but I am a consultant and have been doing this since 1995.
So for the $400.00 M$ is charging for Ultimate, I just do not see any value
BTY one nice feature is the shadow copies, but only for single or home users, if you have a server you already have it.
So list a couple of features that make it worth 4 bills
thank you
Ron
#89
Posted 26 October 2007 - 01:50 PM
* DirectX 10
* Networking 100x better than XP
* User Accounts MUCH improved
* Video Subsystem now runs in it's own workspace, will not crash the machine
* Full image backups (Ultimate Only)
* Stability
* Memory Management
* Prefetching
* Performance and Reliability monitoring
* Wireless Networking is finally usable
* BitLocker
* User Access Control
* Movie Maker works now
* Photo Editing is great
I could go on but I won't. Vista Home Premium can be had for $150. Ultimate is $300.
I've been getting paid for doing IT since 1986, not sure what your point is there. 6 of those years were consulting. I've also been a DBA, a Data Warehousing specialist, and now a Senior Systems Architect. As long as we're comparing experience like I don't know what I'm talking about. ;-)
OK, now I'm done. Ward, I hear ya loud and clear....life is MUCH more interesting with something to argue about.
#92
Posted 26 October 2007 - 02:06 PM
Out of that whole list I would consider the User account better than XP, most of the other stuff has been done better by third parties
But being in IT as long as you have, you would recognize that.
At least I have something to research now
FYI ...the point of the history was to let you know I did not hate every M$ OS only ME and Vista
I am looking for value in the upgrade, not just because it is M$ latest offering, there are people out ther still plenty happy with a 9x box
To roll this out to a company, or even just a department is a serious hit in the pocket book
A decent XP box is under 1k I think you need 2k or better for Vista's hardware requirements
Thanks for the reply
#93
Posted 27 October 2007 - 08:36 AM
In Vista, you can adjust the size of the partitions on the fly, activate and format volumes or inactivate volumes - all without a reboot or third party software.
You listed that the networking is 100x better, so I would assume that includes the fact that assigning volume letters to a network volume is two-three clicks with a mounse under Vista, but much more difficult in XP (I maintain both OS's on a home network)
Better graphics by far.
There is no way that I would downgrade to XP on my Vista machines, although I do run XP on a couple, one is upgradable with a new graphics card, the other (a notebook) is not. But both are 3-4 years old, and that is the way of it. I have an old desktop that I cannot install XP on, but I don't whine about it.
#94
Posted 27 October 2007 - 08:02 PM
#95
Posted 28 October 2007 - 01:17 PM
#96
Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:23 AM
#97
Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:54 AM
Rather than sit by, I suggest you post your problems in the Windows section, listing not only the Vista version, the PC specs and any other programs you may be running. There, I and several others can help you resolve your situation. I would help here, but this is a general discussion/rant section. It is inconceivable that the two programs introduced almost together would be inherently incompatible - they were in development together, and promoted heavily. There have to be other explanations.
#98
Posted 29 October 2007 - 10:09 AM
#99
Posted 29 October 2007 - 11:00 AM
I had problems with an older HP All in One Officejet 6000 series and HP said just plug it in and use the generic drivers they gave MS or buy a new one. It worked fine and I could use any photo program of my choice to scan which I don't use often, the scan to pc button never worked for me anyway so I didn't miss that and I didn't miss the boat load of software HP loads onto your computer when you use the install cd - alot that boots with start up for nothing I needed it to do. On my main computer and laptop for personal and work use I haven't had any software problems but I do use a lot of open source and freeware and they seem to keep up to date with that type of software better then say Quicken 2007 that my bill minder no longer works with and Quicken does not seem to be able to fix that since last yr. I use online, email, instant messaging, manage 3 web site with graphic programs like GIMP and Irfranview using FrontPage 2003 and Nvu, I rip am burn music to CD and MP3 player and work with allot of personal digital pictures. I usually have 3-7 programs open at all time switching between them, Vista seems to handle this fine. I test beta software and any other software before I recommend it to anyone else for use.
I never ugraded any of our 98/ME machines to XP as I felt it wasn't practical, we still have an Windows 98 user left and for what they use the computer for it is fine, we just wait until they either can afford or want a new computer and buy the OS that way. I would never upgrade any XP machine with Vista for this same reason.
#100
Posted 29 October 2007 - 11:13 AM
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote