Cheap Ink: Will It Cost You?
#2
Posted 24 June 2008 - 08:23 AM
While we're at it, we might as well standardize the printer drivers so that the driver can be part of the Windows, Mac, and Linux kernels. That way no more drivers to install, crash, conflict, and generally be a hassle :)
#3
Posted 24 June 2008 - 10:09 AM
After that I bought a Canon BJC-8200, because it uses separate tanks for each color. I've never had any trouble with it. I used it to print the pictures for my sister's wedding invitations, and for many other projects. I liked that printer so much I bought the Canon i960, which uses the same inks. The tanks cost $12 each, but I don't waste any ink when I replace one, everyone carries them, and they don't seem to fade unless left in the sun constantly.
#4
Posted 24 June 2008 - 10:18 AM
#5
Posted 24 June 2008 - 10:20 AM
#6
Posted 24 June 2008 - 10:33 AM
#9
Posted 24 June 2008 - 10:53 AM
#10
Posted 24 June 2008 - 11:10 AM
#11
Posted 24 June 2008 - 11:23 AM
#15
Posted 24 June 2008 - 01:00 PM
#16
Posted 24 June 2008 - 01:04 PM
That's not true, by law, using refilled cartridges of ANY kind will not void your printer's warranty. This is a scare tactic used by the manufacturer. You are guarunteed service UNLESS it is proven the INK damaged your printer. If a cartridge leaked, it can be cleaned. Do not beleive the tech support people. Your warranty is protected.
#17
Posted 24 June 2008 - 01:16 PM
. I think using G&G tanks (which are known to use dye ink instead of pigment) in my Canon iP4300 caused its early death. In the future, I will refill my own with known good ink. I'm now using a HP k5400 along with a set of refillable tanks off eBay. I haven't used up the ink that came with the tanks (photo prints look equally good to the original ink), but when I do, I'll be refilling with top-quality, bulk ink from a reliable seller. <br>
Finally, in comparing inks, the reviewers should use a print-only machine like the iP4300 or its replacement the iP4500 instead of a multifunction machine like the MP series from Canon. Even though the same basic print engine is used, the print-only units will yield better and more consistent print results than the multi. At least that seems to be the case from my experience. This probably holds for other brands as well.<br>
.bh.
Message was edited by: zepper - added more info.
#18
Posted 24 June 2008 - 01:25 PM
#20
Posted 24 June 2008 - 01:45 PM
Ummm, not sure what you're referring to here, but the likelyhood of a printer head being ruined by inferior ink is quite common, SO common, that it's a known issue in the industry, and Canon, among other manufacturers, WILL NOT HELP YOU, should you ruin your printhead with aftermarket inks....you will just have to replace the printer yourself.
from the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Improvement Act:
"except that the prohibition of this subsection be waived by the commission if:
1)
The warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will
function properly only if the article or service so identified is used
in connection with the warranted product, "
This means, that if Canon says that only Canon brand ink cartridges with genuine Canon ink in them will work properly in a Canon printer, and if one tries to use other inks and/or cartridges, and ruins the printer (print head), Canon is not liable.....and therefore will not warranty the printer.....
Allink.coms site says:--<"This is your lifesaver for purchasing your inkjet cartridges at wholesale prices">. This doesn't say "aftermarket, third party or refilled ink cartridges, it just says "purchasing cartridges at wholesale prices"- misleading to say the least....and I doubt they'll go to bat for you against ANY manufacturer...
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote