Sea Stories, War Stories and Lies
#41
Posted 08 September 2008 - 05:25 PM
There were comments about the "shallow water prop", but the truth is that the Coasties flew over deeper water than we did. We rarely flew over water that was not in either Subic or Manila Bays. They made water landings all the time, and I only got to do it once. Hopefully, with the various services combining on a consistent basis, these jibes have gone into the dustbin of history.
#42
Posted 08 September 2008 - 09:36 PM
#43
Posted 09 September 2008 - 10:53 AM
#44
Posted 27 September 2008 - 06:10 AM
While I was in the Navy, the Patrol Squadrons were flying two aircraft, the P3 (still in service almost 40 years later) and the P2. The later variants of the P2 were unique aircraft, the only I know of that had two large reciprocating propeller engines and two small turbo jet engines. The reason for the latter, was that the aircraft was so heavy that it could not fly on one prop engine, so the jets were added so they could be fired up to get the aircraft home.
Most twin engine aircraft while under Air Traffic Control, have to notify ATC of a decrease in true airspeed (TAS) when they lost an engine. P2's would call up and INCREASE their TAS because with one prop and two jets, the aircraft was faster.
This involves a P2 out of Jacksonville, in the Bermuda Triange one night on a routine patrol. They spied a boat, most likely in the 20-30' class or so out in the middle of no where, with no running lights, but not moving. It was a favorite location for partying, so they decided to play games. Since they were fairly high and in cruise mode, they weren't making much noise. They turned around, got a two mile run on them, dropped down to about 50', increased to full power on both recips and fired off the jets (two turning, two burning was the phrase they used), and about a quarter of a mile out fired off the 100 million candlepower searchlight (used to illuminate subs) and "lit off" the boat. After passing over the boat, they shut down the searchlight and jets, climbed up to several thousand feet and turned around.
The cruiser had all the lights on and was moving at full throttle. They didn't know where they were going, they were just getting the heck out of there! We always wondered at the story of what the people aboard said, and if they included what they were doing at the time in their story.
#46
Posted 02 October 2008 - 01:46 PM
San Miguel was not only the location of the main brewery, but also the Naval Communications center. Our Scout Camp was located on that facility, and the access in and out of camp was through the antenna field. They had electronic gates and lights, so that no one could go the field while the main transmitter was operating.
#47
Posted 02 October 2008 - 01:54 PM
#48
Posted 02 October 2008 - 06:32 PM
Yes, I remember the guy's checking the labels. I didn't prowl O' Town, and we didn't have too much trouble with the clubs on base. They knew to check before they accepted the shipment.
#49
Posted 02 October 2008 - 06:43 PM
I really enjoy coming over to this thread once in a while and checking out the latest news, whether old or not, it's always interesting.
@ RGreen, what's a P3?
#50
Posted 02 October 2008 - 07:09 PM
Many nations fly the aircraft, not just the U.S. Here are a couple of photos, including one with both U.S. Navy and Japanese Maritime Defense Force P-3's.
!http://forums.pcworld.com/legacyimages/
1!
!http://forums.pcworld.com/legacyimages/
1!
#51
Posted 03 October 2008 - 11:13 AM
#52
Posted 03 October 2008 - 06:49 PM
In my case, I was flying almost every day. As the rule went, "No smoking within 50 feet of the aircraft and no drinking within 24 hours of a flight". My self imposed rule was even when permissable, no more than two. I had already established from personal experience that 4 or more brews resulted in an undesirable experience - I got sick and lost everything. Over, and over and over. After making several long distance telephone calls to Ralph O'Rourke via the ceramic telephone, I decided that was no fun.
I was not about to trust an Olongopo bartender with a mixed drink.
We had several enlisted who married into local families and lived in town. Of course they didn't patrol either. We had one officer who married a Filipino, but not there. He met her while she was going to school in Washington state. It killed his career. Marrying a foreign national revokes all security clearances. (Canada and UK used to be exceptions). It is difficult to function as an officer without one. It is impossible to fly, although he had already had his wings pulled for lack of performance. It's also hard to function when the crew doesn't want to fly with you.
#53
Posted 03 October 2008 - 07:34 PM
#54
Posted 04 October 2008 - 08:18 AM
#56
Posted 05 October 2008 - 01:03 PM
#57
Posted 05 October 2008 - 01:43 PM
#58
Posted 05 October 2008 - 03:29 PM
#59
Posted 05 October 2008 - 04:05 PM
#60
Posted 05 October 2008 - 06:04 PM
Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote

