Palm Pre: Why I'm on the Fence
#2
Posted 10 January 2009 - 06:27 PM
I have never quite understood the need for a physical keyboard because it is just as hard typing on a physical keyboard as in a virtual one. But the virtual one has one advantage in that it makes the phone lighter.
Pre doesn't look all that great to me so far.
#3
Posted 10 January 2009 - 07:08 PM
So I have been looking at a few of the newest smart phone entries: The BB Bold, The Android G1, the Nokia n97, and now the Palm Pre.
While the lack of a media card slot seems a little short-sided on the outset, after a little thought on the subject I do not see it as an big deal, and certainly not a show stopper.
Like a lot of folks, I own a lot of gadgets, too many to even list. But, for instance, I have a 60g iPod, and an 8G iPod Nano. While my "big" iPod holds a lot more music than my Nano (pretty much my entire music collection), I find that what the Nano holds is more than adequate (it actually has 2G's free at the moment) for daily listening. And while I have a much bigger selection on my 60G iPod, there is a lot of music there that I just don't need with me all the time (ie Christmas music). And lately, I have not been using my iPod much at all since I got a new Slacker.com portable for Christmas (and slacker works great on the Blackberry now as well).
While I have become quite attached to my Blackberry, I have always had a fondness for the Palm devices (note: none of the Windows Mobile ones)... the simplicity of the devices has always been a selling point, even for an aging OS. Instant access to main functions, universal search (all Palms have always had this), a physical ringer/vibrate mute button to name just a few. And now the Pre brings it all into the 21st century... I am so ready...
#4
Posted 10 January 2009 - 07:31 PM
For a buyer looking for a phone as a media player capacity is a big issue. Being stuck with what comes with the phone means when you run out of room buying a new phone is your only option.
Sure it's the same thing with iphone, but if all things are equal which would you choose as a media player: Pre or Iphone? It's a no brainer. You can't let a buyer say "Well, I can't even get 16GB on the Pre so I might as well go with Iphone".
Palm can't let any feature go uncontested. They've upped the stakes in many features: camera, open source, charging pad, keyboard, multi-tasking, but if they leave any feature a clear shortcoming they expose them self to criticism for coming up short.
The press is a winner take all animal, you can't leave any room to attack.
Honestly I think Palm should bypass the micro sd and put in a full SD slot. Those things are honestly very small. They might add a bit of size and weight to the unit, but hardly worth worrying about. Not when you consider that would give Pre the ability to add 32GB of memory. with the 8GB on board that would make for 40 media storage. That'd kick the Iphone where the sun doesn't shine.
What really strikes me as amazing is that Palm is sticking to the one carrier roll out. I believe that Apple has really screwed the cash pouch by sticking with one company. How many units could they have sold, and for how much, if they were available for use on all carriers?
How many people are there who wouldn't switch to AT&T no matter what?
The lock-customers-in model is obviously running on fumes. A company that refutes it from day one will prove itself a game changer, and being a game changer is the only thing that really gets any attention these days.
Rolling out on all carriers from day one might take a herculean effort. But it would prove Palm has an openness that Apple obviously lacks. It's the kind of move that could really pay off for a company playing for their survival.
Go long Palm, you've nothing to lose.
best,
Will Knapp
#5
Posted 10 January 2009 - 08:58 PM
#6
Posted 10 January 2009 - 09:40 PM
I am in such a conundrum right now. Should I wait for Palm's next WebOS device and hope it has more capacity, or at least an expansion slot, or suck it up and get the Pre and resign myself to giving up over half my music library? Or, god forbid, just get an iPhone (shudder).
Please save me from this choice Palm, increase the Pre's memory before its release!
#7
Posted 10 January 2009 - 10:31 PM
I will not go into what I have now...but after having 4 Palms, numberous replacements as a result of Power and memory problems, it would take a GREAT deal of Unbiased testing AND warranty to reconsider PALM again.
Sorry Palm, you lost a loyal customer with one to many fatal crashes.
I do not like the current trend of Cameras in my PDA...I do not use it enough to justify having a camera.
#10
Posted 11 January 2009 - 02:42 AM
I broke down and bought a Treo after a 3 year hiatus, since I had no portable phone book or calendar system. I DO like the Treo search feature. I prefer graffiti and shortcuts over a small keyboard.
Palm failed by making their basic programs TOO simple (what, I have to write the whole name in the calendar every time?). The Palm is unusable without a program like Agendus where popup menus allow you to easily link names and events together - hold your stylus on a name and a menu pops up to schedule a meeting, call or to do, as well as dial.
I couldn't use a Palm without that ease of use. We'll see what the Pre does...
#12
Posted 11 January 2009 - 05:01 AM
#13
Posted 11 January 2009 - 07:27 AM
I've been disappointed and disillusioned with palm. It took them forever to update their OS. And their Treos look old compared to the iPhone. Honestly, I have written then off and didn't expect much from them.
So I was really surprised when I heard about the Pre. It looks like its going to be a great phone!
But I don't know. The Pre will use a totally different OS and the old palm OS applications will not be compatible. I'm all for competition but there will now be the following phone OS: Palm OS, iPhone, RIM, windows mobile, Symbian, Android, and the new Palm WebOS. That's seven different phone operating systems and I'm sure I forgot about a few.
I'm afraid this will spread developers out to thin.
I'm not sure if Palm should just have gone with the Android.
#14
Posted 11 January 2009 - 07:35 AM
I think you are wanting a perfect phone, by what you say. I really look forward to this phone. I LOVE my current Palm phone - the Samsung i500. I think that 8 Gigs will be more than adequate for all the songs I'll want to load.
Also, transferring via USB rather than use a card is okay with me. It is just another way to connect and transfer.
I have held off replacing my i500 until seeing what phone Palm came out with next. I am going to buy this phone when it comes out.
#16
Posted 11 January 2009 - 08:00 AM
#17
Posted 11 January 2009 - 08:52 AM
One last thing i notice is the Pre has sorta a task switch which lets me go back to the last application faster. On the iPhone you have to go to back and re-run the app to go back (for ex, after a program launches a weblink to safari) it's a pure pain in the butt and NOT-Business friendly.
Bottom line iPhone seems like a toy when i use it. The Pre seem to fix those problems, I'm probably getting the Pre knowing how great Palm makes user interfaces. (been using the Treo 650 for over 3 years, best interface for speed for any phone I've used/tried).
#18
Posted 11 January 2009 - 08:57 AM
sell this the most people, even ones that prefer a Expansion option. (such as me) lol. I'll probably get a 16 gb option which they'll come out with fi they dont'fold
#20
Posted 11 January 2009 - 09:36 AM
Yes, I saw that it's Sprint only. That's why I'm criticizing that move. I say that they could do so much better with a broad channel roll out. They should have subsidized phones on ALL the carriers and a full price phone for those who use different carriers or travel overseas etc.
This would be a bold marketing move which will strongly differentiate Palm from Apple.
All these phone makers say they aren't going head to head with Apple, when in reality that is exactly what they are doing. They are reacting to the expectation that they "have to" have a touch phone, yet they lower expectations (in both features and marketing) to avoid looking like coming up short against Iphone (and thereby hopefully keep their jobs).
There's a story about when Bill Gates first got his hands on a Macintosh. He went right into the office and said "We have to have a Mactintosh on the PC". They did that and by matching the features of the Mac and bested it in some key areas (like open hardware availability) they stole Apple's lunch.
Palm has to man-up to the fact that the Iphone is the challenge. It has to be at least as good as it in all features and beat it in as many as possible. Only that way can it really hit a home run.
Open distribution and expandable storage are just a couple of features that Apple can't (or won't) compete with so Palm should take full advantage of them.
best,
Will Knapp
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote