Judge Says Video Games "Not a Defense" for Parents' Murder
#1
Posted 12 January 2009 - 10:26 AM
#2
Posted 12 January 2009 - 11:14 AM
#3
Posted 12 January 2009 - 01:24 PM
#4
Posted 12 January 2009 - 01:38 PM
#5
Posted 12 January 2009 - 05:40 PM
#6
Posted 12 January 2009 - 08:13 PM
I used to live next door to one of these budding psychopaths. He was a kid in his early teens, who broke into my apartment twice; was a compulsive liar; spliced his parents phone line into mine from the box outside so that he could call porn phone lines on my dime; he keyed my car, and dented it with an icepick several times because I had him arrested for breaking into my apartment; he basically destroyed the apartment that he and his parents were living in with a bb gun; he terrorized his family cat by chasing it through the apartment, shooting at it with the bb gun; then, when his parents finally got sick of me calling the police on him, they moved to another house, which he set on fire twice while his mother was inside. He was busted (and expelled) several times for selling drugs in school. Each time he would go to court, his parents would plead and cry to the judge, saying that he was abused as a kid, etc, blah blah blah. His defense lawyers would always tell the court that he was just a kid, and that being incarcerated wouldn't help him. The end result was that he never did any jail time; his mother eventually left their house because she had become so terrified of him, and he finally did the world a favor several years later by overdosing on drugs and killing himself. Had he not done that, I'm convinced he would have killed several other people during his lifetime.
I don't care what age a person is... If he or she willfully kills someone, they should be held fully responsible. No more "but it wasn't my fault" excuses.
#7
Posted 12 January 2009 - 10:09 PM
#8
Posted 13 January 2009 - 03:54 AM
#9
Posted 13 January 2009 - 04:44 AM
#11
Posted 13 January 2009 - 05:19 AM
#12
Posted 13 January 2009 - 07:06 AM
#13
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:41 AM
#14
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:53 AM
getmything said:
I agree. I believe that if you are actually caught in the act of killing someone, you should be taken out back and shot... No trial and then endless appeals. The world is grossly overpopulated. We don't need to be taking care of the needs of these thugs in prison. The resources that are saved could be put to much better use.
#15
Posted 13 January 2009 - 02:00 PM
Are you serious about over population? You know that you're part of the supposed problem?
I say, execute the kid by hanging, shooting, stoning, burning, or something similar.
Message was edited by: number6. Give him a trial, convict him, then execute him.
#16
Posted 13 January 2009 - 05:26 PM
#17
Posted 13 January 2009 - 09:05 PM
#18
Posted 18 January 2009 - 04:15 AM
#19
Posted 19 January 2009 - 05:36 AM
#20
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:48 AM
I didn't notice anything niave, either. I don't know what the problem is. The kid murdered two people. The proper punishment has always been execution.
Help













