|  RSS

PC World Forums: COPA Child-Porn Law Killed - PC World Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

COPA Child-Porn Law Killed

#1 User is offline   PCWorld Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 44,207
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:03 AM

Post your comments for COPA Child-Porn Law Killed here
0

#2 User is offline   JimH443 Icon

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,217
  • Joined: 06-May 07

Posted 22 January 2009 - 01:49 PM

COPA is not a child porn law. It's a law that (ineffectively) attempts to prevent minors from accessing pornographic material.
I think we're all aware that this is not a description of what child porn is.
0

#3 User is offline   hsr0601 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 22-January 09

Posted 22 January 2009 - 02:48 PM

Children protection act / software are required simultaneously to keep them safer,and feedom does not imply wrong deed, especially for vulnerable children, I suppose. Looks like corruption spreads into the jurisdiction as well as the rest of arenas.
0

#4 User is offline   coolbair Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 22-January 09

Posted 22 January 2009 - 05:57 PM

"my personal opinion is that the government has more pressing issues to attend to than babysitting children online."

It's hardly babysitting to defend a child's right to NOT see the kind of crap being forced down the throats of youth today. In fact, there aren't any issues on the president's desk that are more important than defending the values of families, who are the building blocks of society. Pornography is a cancer that has contributed to the decay of this country and will ultimately lead to it's death if not abated.
0

#5 User is offline   JimH443 Icon

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,217
  • Joined: 06-May 07

Posted 22 January 2009 - 11:10 PM

coolbair said:

> It's hardly babysitting to defend a child's right to NOT see the kind of crap being forced down the throats of youth today.



Any child that wishes to surf the internet porn-free is quite able to do so. While porn is out there and accessed easily enough... it won't initiate the attack.
0

#6 User is offline   mcbarker Icon

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,078
  • Joined: 10-August 06
  • Location:Connecticut, USA

Posted 23 January 2009 - 01:45 AM

Supervising children is the role of the parents, not the government's. Period!
0

#7 User is offline   JimH443 Icon

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,217
  • Joined: 06-May 07

Posted 23 January 2009 - 01:54 AM

mcbarker said:

Supervising children is the role of the parents, not the government's. Period!



Agreed.

Playing "devil's advocate" here (since I do agree completely with you): Unfortunately, far too many parents are doing a worse job than the government could ever get away with. Should these children suffer due to that incompetence?
0

#8 User is offline   don588765 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 22-November 08

Posted 23 January 2009 - 02:58 AM

This should be a positive thing for all the law being enfored. The courts did not take away the people rights.
0

#9 User is offline   Hichardo Icon

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 19-December 08

Posted 23 January 2009 - 03:40 AM

Too many laws against child-porn its taking away rights

less laws better
0

#10 User is offline   JimH443 Icon

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,217
  • Joined: 06-May 07

Posted 23 January 2009 - 03:56 AM

I repeat: This is NOT a child porn law! Child porn, for those who are unaware, is pornography where those being filmed are under the age of 18. It's child porn no matter what - even if adults view it.
0

#11 User is offline   darkhalcyon Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 23-January 09

Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:22 AM

It's not the government's job to watch our nation's children. It's the parents' job. We are far too willing to place the responsiblity of limiting what our children see on the TV or the internet into the hands of government. Why? Can't figure out how to restrict access to certain sites? Your kids figuring out ways around it? Too unpleasant for you to say "no" to the kids? I see too much laziness when it comes to monitoring kids' behavior than taking personal responsibility for what you and your offspring contribute to this world. Do you know why pornography will never die? because ALOT of adults pay for it. And, personally, I think in terms of what might be more harmul to kids, watching people in the act of reproduction probably isn't as damaging as watching people get blown up in movies.



Go home, learn to use your computer and your internet-babysitting software, and spend time with your kids so they don't end up being the cancer that is killing society.
0

#12 User is offline   seanheeger Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 24-January 09

Posted 24 January 2009 - 02:08 AM

This was a fascist law that was appropriately shot down. It was also a lame attempt to get parents out of the responsibility of raising their kids.
0

#13 User is offline   jrsniper12453 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 24-January 09

Posted 24 January 2009 - 12:06 PM

"Pornography is a cancer that has contributed to the decay of this country and will ultimately lead to it's death if not abated."

Hahahaha yes in 200 years when children are learning history they will hear of Troy which fell to a huge army and a trojan horse, the USSR which crumpled because it lost a war and had most of the world pressuring it, and the United States, which simply could not handle the porn. haha
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users