smax013 said:
Yes and no. True, Apple did not invent IEEE 1394, which is the underlying specification of Firewire. But, they did "invent" Firewire...I put invent in quotes because they did not actually invent the technology, but they did trademark the Firewire name, which is kind of like "inventing" Firewire (i.e. they invented the name). Firewire is Apple's trademark name for IEEE 1394...which means that if you want to market that your computer has Firewire, then you have to pay Apple some money (rather nice money grap by Apple). It is just like Sony calling IEEE 1394 "iLink"...Sony trademarked that name.
Apple is good at spinning FUD. It's like they invented EVERYTHING...
http://www.ieee.org/...home/index.html
A non-profit organization, IEEE is the world's leading professional association for the advancement of technology.
The IEEE name was originally an acronym for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Today, the organization's scope of interest has expanded into so many related fields, that it is simply referred to by the letters I-E-E-E (pronounced Eye-triple-E).
The IEEE is a standards body organization. Lots of standards came from them. Nothing to do with Apple which is a for profit only marketing organization.
Similar with EFI. Apple didn't invent anything there either. All newer motherboards are going EFI.
http://en.wikipedia....wiki/ExtensibleFirmwareInterface
The Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) is a specification that defines a software interface between an operating system and platform firmware. EFI is a much larger, more complex,[1] OS-like[2]:4 replacement of the older BIOS firmware interface present in all IBM PC-compatible personal computers.[2] The
EFI specification was originally developed by Intel, and is now managed by the Unified EFI Forum.
The original motivation for EFI came during early development of the first Intel-HP Itanium systems in the mid-1990s. PC BIOS limitations (16-bit processor mode, 1 MB addressable space, PC AT hardware dependencies, etc.) were seen as clearly unacceptable for the larger server platforms Itanium was targeting. The initial effort to address these concerns was initially called Intel Boot Initiative and was later renamed to EFI.[3]
In 2005, the UEFI Forum was created, and is now responsible for EFI development[4] and promotion.
Version 2.1 of the UEFI specification was released on January 7, 2007; as of March 2007. It added cryptography, network authentication, and the User Interface Architecture (Human Interface Infrastructure in UEFI).
http://en.wikipedia....wiki/UEFI_Forum
The Unified EFI Forum or UEFI Forum (where UEFI stands for Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) is an alliance between several leading technology companies including AMD, American Megatrends, Apple, ARM, Dell, HP, IBM, Insyde Software, Intel, Lenovo, Microsoft, and Phoenix Technologies.
Again, nothing to do with Apple, other than they participate, like all others... Including Microsoft.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930061
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 supports Extended Firmware Interface (EFI) 1.10 on Intel Itanium platforms. Windows Server 2008 supports EFI 1.10 on Intel Itanium platforms, and introduces support to start the computer by using a native UEFI boot on x64 64-bit platforms. Although the initial release of Windows Vista will not include UEFI x64 64-bit support, a later Windows Vista release will support UEFI.
Who needs bootcamp? Windows can boot through EFI natively. Including Windows 7... (except perhaps for XP... Sorry I look ahead, not behind)