How (and Why) To Partition Your Hard Drive
#1
Posted 06 January 2010 - 11:04 AM
#2
Posted 06 January 2010 - 11:24 AM
1) Why do the still put totals in megabytes? Whom still uses a drive under 1 gigabyte anymore?
2) Why does it takes so slow to format a drive? Under Windows 7 installing a custom installation does not really format the drive the way that XP and Vista do when installing a new os.
#3
Posted 11 January 2010 - 07:18 AM
#4
Posted 11 January 2010 - 12:39 PM
#5
Posted 11 January 2010 - 05:00 PM
#6
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:11 PM
Abort, Retry, Epic Fail? _
#7
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:44 PM
C:\Program Drive
D:\Data Drive.
The OS goes on the Program Drive.
Want more Data Security? Install 2 matching data HD's in a RAID 1 configuration. Then if one of the RAID Drives crashes, ALL of your data is safe on the other RAID Drive. Then you simply replace the dead HD with one of identical size, & the RAID system will rebuild all your data onto the new drive. It's too simple!!!
MLStrand56
#8
Posted 12 January 2010 - 02:41 AM
#9
Posted 14 January 2010 - 09:37 PM
PCMan4ever, on 06 January 2010 - 11:24 AM, said:
1) Why do the still put totals in megabytes? Whom still uses a drive under 1 gigabyte anymore?
2) Why does it takes so slow to format a drive? Under Windows 7 installing a custom installation does not really format the drive the way that XP and Vista do when installing a new os.
I imagine why they do this(even though it DOES get annoying) is so users can be more accurate/precise. Making a 1 GB partition for some files, and making a 1.5 GB partition is different, especially when you're limited on disc space. And while most users aren't in this predicament, it's much easier for Microsoft to just put it in MB; after all, most people don't really mind.
#10
Posted 14 January 2010 - 09:38 PM
MLStrand56, on 11 January 2010 - 10:44 PM, said:
C:\Program Drive
D:\Data Drive.
The OS goes on the Program Drive.
Want more Data Security? Install 2 matching data HD's in a RAID 1 configuration. Then if one of the RAID Drives crashes, ALL of your data is safe on the other RAID Drive. Then you simply replace the dead HD with one of identical size, & the RAID system will rebuild all your data onto the new drive. It's too simple!!!
MLStrand56
Oh, forgive us poor bastards for not being able to dish out money for a HD at will.
#11
Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:07 AM
#12
Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:38 AM
canelopejones64, on 11 January 2010 - 12:39 PM, said:
Hi canelopejones64,
When one first see an External Hard Drive, you want to partition it, but External Hard Drives should not be partitioned.
The purpose of partitioning the Hard Drive, is to seperate the operating system from the Data partition or for dual-booting your computer. It isn't for backing up of the operating system. You want to backup to another Hard Drive or External Hard Drive. By placing your My Documents Folder and its sub-folders as well as the Desktop's Briefcase Folder on a seperate partition, reducing the amount of time it takes to make a backup of your Documents folder.
However, you do want to keep a partition image of your Hard Drive's operating system on the same Hard Drive and a copy on an external Hard Drive! Why? a partition image that exists on the same Hard Drive, makes restoring a good Hard Drive's operating system fast. Storing on another Hard Drive, makes replacement of the existing Hard Drive easier than without one.
Just my opinion.
#13
Posted 18 January 2010 - 06:02 PM
Unless you are trying to delete and make sure no data is available on the drive, you can pick Quick Format - after right clicling on the drive.
In my case a 250GB intenal laptop drive takes about 15 seconds for a quick format.
Windows XP- gave a DOS screen from which you could - Delete Partions - Re-Create Partions - and Format partions.
If you deleted a partion and wanted to start totally fresh, you would be given the option prior to installation to format the partion as NTFS,
but I don't remember, that XP and Vista formats the drive if it is alreary formatted, unless you choose to - via the page where the OS ask you
to which partion you want to install, and then choosing Options and Format. Again it is a choice not an automatic formatting.
Windows 7 gives you the same choice.
@LINDA
It is great that all your partions read HEALTHY - but you have to understand that mechanical drives could fail, you wrote - "all my partions read healthy"
you have more then one. The index file telling the operating system what you have in different partitions is located at the very front of each formatted partiton
which as well as on the C drive so that the OS know where to find them, but if the drive goes south due to mechanical problems you are in trouble and it is the reason why multiple partitions for different purposes is a good thing to have.
For example in my case, a laptop - I use 2 partitions - C for the os and applications and D for all my personal files.
Since I test a lot of different software. Windows 7 gives me the ability to make 2 images - An image with only the Operating system and programs I would need
just to start using my computer in case it goes south. And an image with the OS, All programs, and All programs that access data pointing to the D partition.
That way, when restoring from the back up IMAGES - I can restore any which way I want.
With 7 I can create all type of IMAGES TO RESTORE TO.
-------Abviously, your IMAGES should reside on an External Hard Drive---------------------
And a simple back up to External Drive of all your PERSONAL DATA alone - It may sound as if I am over doing things but it has been a time and life saver for me.
@canelope
You created a 7 GB partiton and you left the rest un-used - Now that you know what UNALOCATED means, and since i am concluding that your personal data is
in your C drive intact - You should re-partition the External drive for better use.
If you are using Windows 7, you can create images of your system if it is at this point working correctly - see my points above to Linda - but you should
defenetely find a better use for all that storage then just simply leaving it Un-used.
@oldschool,
I agree with you, if the partitions are being done within your computer's main drive - But partitioning an External Drive for the purposes I mentioned above
is very helpful.
@george007
Do you have an External Drive - IF YES - CREATE CLEAN IMAGES - of your entire system through Windows 7 - When you get to the Back up and Restore page, look for a link - CREATE A SYSTEM IMAGE.
Images are different then Back ups - Windows 7 can create INCREMENTAL back ups - meaning only the new data from the last back up will be save to the back up.
An image copies your entire drive including OS, Applications and Data.
If you created two partitions C and D no problem - I would conclude that under this setup all your data is on D - Therefore, any new personal file you create, modify or download would be save to D - As a result an image of both C and D weekly will RESTORE EVERYTHING.
AND LAST TO PCWORLD -
I DID NOT SEE THE ARTICLE ADDRESSING RE-DIRECTION OF FOLDERS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For those who partition your internal drive in 2 - OS and DATA.
Once you move your PERSONAL DATA to the D partition - you should point your personal folders to D - otherwise, your folders on C would be empty.
Right click on the folders you want to POINT to D - Select the TAB - LOCATION and just put the letter D at the beginning of the string.
Windows will pop up 2 windows - 1 - Confirm you want to point the folder to D and 2 - Asking if you want all the files to be moved to D so that Windows
Explorer do not duplicate the same Folder when viewing your folder structure through Windows Explorer. In other words you would end up with
My Documents - My Documents on the folder list or Tree.
Thank you all
G
Create
#14
Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:55 PM
#15
Posted 12 February 2010 - 03:30 PM
#16
Posted 07 April 2012 - 05:57 PM
MLStrand56, on 11 January 2010 - 10:44 PM, said:
C:\Program Drive
D:\Data Drive.
The OS goes on the Program Drive.
Want more Data Security? Install 2 matching data HD's in a RAID 1 configuration. Then if one of the RAID Drives crashes, ALL of your data is safe on the other RAID Drive. Then you simply replace the dead HD with one of identical size, & the RAID system will rebuild all your data onto the new drive. It's too simple!!!
MLStrand56
small partitions make sense if you want to have many many small files: so why not use short stroking? for larger files, partitions are not practical because the cluster size is larger; in other words, it takes more space for the same amount of data; this is one reason (there others but this is one of the main reasons to my knowledge) why partitioned drives have less available space to write, effectively shrinking availability of space to write data.
true, a RAID-1 array will create redundancies; but, the installation process of the RAID-1 config is not a walk in the park. most likely, the hard drives will need to undergo whole disk partition that wipes the file sector. on top of that, next, if you haven't preserved the integrity of Master Boot Record (MBR) on drive (in first sector of hard drive, on the partition table), the hdd will need to be repaired, if it can be (use a utility that has MBR function). if you do a whole hard drive partition and then try to connect it to a RAID-1, you need some extra time and patience. this is not an in 'n' out operation. n.b. the recovery drive contains mirrored data and is not a reliable form of data back up and recovery (especially in RAID-0 config); this means that if you want to make the recovery drive a master drive, you need to trick the MBR in the hard drive schematic. remember that all this only applies if you have a hardware concern only. converting the recovery drive to the master is time-consuming and lots of downtime for accessibility of data. you must get recovery to identify its own MBR and bypass this area since RAID-1 makes it a recovery drive and does not seem to know to make it a master drive when master drive is missing, deteriorated, etc.
if you have a current RAID-1 config (2 drives, etc.) and you want to disassociate the two, you'll need to convert RAID-1 to a single drive by identifying the 128 sectors of the MBR and move them elsewhere, because this is what RAID-1 reads immediately and prefigs in configuration and launch. now, you have liberated your recovery drive so that it can function as a master drive. Enter System BIOS Setup <F2> and go to Advanced > Drive Configuration > and be sure to have RAID selected. now, the trick is to create a new RAID set by entering Intel Matrix Storage Manager option ROM: press <Ctrl-I> in order to enter RAID Configuration Utility; select option 1: Create RAID Volume. Enter volume name. Select RAID 1. Select drives to be used in RAID array. Select strip size. Enter size of the volume (if you create a volume less than the max volume size, you can create a second RAID array on remaining portion) and press <Enter>. Press <Enter> again to Create Volume. Exit Option ROM user interface. then, hopefully, there is articulation.
whatever the case, just do your research and you should be okay!
#17
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:24 PM
Quote
I do agree that partitioning is not a viable method of backup. However, this article is not describing a method of backup. It is describing a method of running multiple operating systems on the same computer, of which partitioning is a necessary step. Backup is just a highly suggested prerequisite for the partitioning.
#18
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:24 PM
Quote
I do agree that partitioning is not a viable method of backup. However, this article is not describing a method of backup. It is describing a method of running multiple operating systems on the same computer, of which partitioning is a necessary step. Backup is just a highly suggested prerequisite for the partitioning.
#20
Posted 14 February 2013 - 01:36 PM
2-Is it reasonable to have 3 or 4 drives if you have 2-3 different field of activities and put every type of data in each drive?
Help












