Why Apple Fanboys Are So Wrong About Flash
#1
Posted 31 August 2010 - 12:42 PM
#2
Posted 31 August 2010 - 12:58 PM
QuickTime used to support limited Flash playback:
http://en.wikipedia....e#QuickTime_7.x
#3
Posted 31 August 2010 - 01:09 PM
#4
Posted 31 August 2010 - 01:15 PM
JosephBates, on 31 August 2010 - 01:09 PM, said:
You're probably right about my maturity, but FYI, I didn't write the headline.
The headline I wrote is here: http://blogs.compute...2/android_flash
This is a syndicated version of my original story from Computerworld, and the title was changed by someone else along the way.
Cheers,
JR
#5
Posted 31 August 2010 - 01:54 PM
#6
Posted 31 August 2010 - 03:15 PM
However, Apple play on this issue had more to do with taking over Adobe's turf by force. It seems like it will not work at this point, and Apple will have find a honorable way to retract from its stance.
#7
Posted 31 August 2010 - 04:24 PM
It doesn't mean Adobe has a viable version of Flash for iOS at the moment and it doesn't mean that what Adobe had available at the time of the iPad's launch was anything but what Jobs claimed it was.
What makes you think Apple "fanbois" don't want Flash? Maybe because we don't whine and complain and stamp our feet as loudly as those who don't actually use Apple products? We like our devices for our own reasons (or we wouldn't have bought them. According to surveys, we're mostly a fairly educated bunch, haven't you heard?) We accept the apparent limitations that are part and parcel of using iDevices because they do a lot of other stuff we like very well. I would love to have Flash on my iOS devices, but it's not a deal breaker for me.
If Adobe has perfected Flash for iOS, all they have to do is demo it to prove Steve Jobs wrong in a very public and humiliating way.
I'm still waiting...
...and I don't think Steve Jobs is losing any sleep over any impending humiliation.
This post has been edited by 42n81: 31 August 2010 - 04:50 PM
#8
Posted 31 August 2010 - 04:32 PM
JosephBates, on 31 August 2010 - 01:09 PM, said:
Two things,
There really are fanboys out there. The press gives them this title, as does virtually every other written or podcast media I've seen. It has nothing to do with maturity. It's merely a classification. Get over yourself.
#9
Posted 31 August 2010 - 05:57 PM
42n81, on 31 August 2010 - 04:24 PM, said:
It doesn't mean Adobe has a viable version of Flash for iOS at the moment and it doesn't mean that what Adobe had available at the time of the iPad's launch was anything but what Jobs claimed it was.
What makes you think Apple "fanbois" don't want Flash? Maybe because we don't whine and complain and stamp our feet as loudly as those who don't actually use Apple products? We like our devices for our own reasons (or we wouldn't have bought them. According to surveys, we're mostly a fairly educated bunch, haven't you heard?) We accept the apparent limitations that are part and parcel of using iDevices because they do a lot of other stuff we like very well. I would love to have Flash on my iOS devices, but it's not a deal breaker for me.
If Adobe has perfected Flash for iOS, all they have to do is demo it to prove Steve Jobs wrong in a very public and humiliating way.
I'm still waiting...
...and I don't think Steve Jobs is losing any sleep over any impending humiliation.
Oh yes, we can tell, the majority of the Apple purchases go to teens/tweens, and they are certainly quite well educated... None of them doing the stupid things kids do out of peer pressure.
Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png
#10
Posted 31 August 2010 - 09:33 PM
#13
Posted 01 September 2010 - 02:44 AM
#14
Posted 01 September 2010 - 04:18 AM
waldojim, on 31 August 2010 - 05:57 PM, said:
42n81, on 31 August 2010 - 04:24 PM, said:
It doesn't mean Adobe has a viable version of Flash for iOS at the moment and it doesn't mean that what Adobe had available at the time of the iPad's launch was anything but what Jobs claimed it was.
What makes you think Apple "fanbois" don't want Flash? Maybe because we don't whine and complain and stamp our feet as loudly as those who don't actually use Apple products? We like our devices for our own reasons (or we wouldn't have bought them. According to surveys, we're mostly a fairly educated bunch, haven't you heard?) We accept the apparent limitations that are part and parcel of using iDevices because they do a lot of other stuff we like very well. I would love to have Flash on my iOS devices, but it's not a deal breaker for me.
If Adobe has perfected Flash for iOS, all they have to do is demo it to prove Steve Jobs wrong in a very public and humiliating way.
I'm still waiting...
...and I don't think Steve Jobs is losing any sleep over any impending humiliation.
Oh yes, we can tell, the majority of the Apple purchases go to teens/tweens, and they are certainly quite well educated... None of them doing the stupid things kids do out of peer pressure.
I don't do the surveys and I don't publish them. I only remember and mention the ones I find favorable.
More to the point, don't you think it's about time Adobe shows us they can actually do Flash on iOS viably?
The "Adobe loves Apple" campaign just didn't do it for me.
#15
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:09 AM
HOWEVER, the next phone I buy will definitely be an Android given that Android is now just as good as iOS, and with Flash-support and open development.
#16
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:23 AM
Because of the pressure Apple has put on Adobe, Flash is becoming a better product. If anything, you should be thanking Apple. Not still crying in your beer that a company has a wildly successful product that you happen to not like ...
#17
Posted 01 September 2010 - 07:36 AM
Quant, on 31 August 2010 - 04:32 PM, said:
JosephBates, on 31 August 2010 - 01:09 PM, said:
Two things,
There really are fanboys out there. The press gives them this title, as does virtually every other written or podcast media I've seen. It has nothing to do with maturity. It's merely a classification. Get over yourself.
How about you get over your ignorance, Quant? The term "fanboy" suggests a person who will accept and defend whatever a particular company offers, without critical thought or good reason. It is a pejorative term, and as Joseph intimates, immediately slants the article. Rather than encouraging level-headed discussion, it immediately alienates those who are labeled.
Steve Jobs has argued that Flash on mobile devices is buggy, a battery drain, and slows down the entire system, and tests of Flash on Android have proven him correct.
Of course, Android fanboys think otherwise.
#18
Posted 01 September 2010 - 07:42 AM
Or are you giving us just a glossed-over view of how 2.2 is handling Flash?
#19
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:25 AM
Also, I guess the writer of this article failed to realize that even microsoft has come out and said that flash is horrible, and it won't be on there phones.... but you know, they don't have Jobs and all, so you can't go all orwellian or draconian, since microsoft offers "choice" as well.
I made my CHOICE and when my buddies are busy rebooting and re-rooting there android phones, and wondering why this app works, and this one does not, and (eventually cus you know its coming) they have to download security software just to ran do thing (a la another co. with "choice") I will continue doing stuff on my devices, instead of spending my time getting them to work. Enjoy your flash!
#20
Posted 01 September 2010 - 11:03 AM
And in none of the articles describing actual usage do the authors get down to details like battery usage.
Help















