Trojan Monitors Your Porn Surfing Habits, Threatens To Blackmail You
#1
Posted 14 September 2010 - 09:48 PM
#2
Posted 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM
#3
Posted 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM
arbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:
Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".
#4
Posted 14 September 2010 - 11:33 PM
1) You'll see Viruses ect popping up more for that OS
2) I'll be scratching my head wondering why people went ahead for OSX but shrug as it's their money down the drain.
Essentially, there's just 1 simple way of avoiding a virus like this.
READ THE SUBJECT, as with moth e-mail clients, there is the 'subject' field that has some info on the topic at hand or even the e-mail sender's name would instantly be a red flag when it's something like "ChEaP\/iGrA". There's a simple thing to do.
DELETE THOSE E-MAILS
Chirst, people shouldn't blindly download attachments or read e-mails from people they don't know or even from those that are from 'friends' as I stated, read the subject that that's quite likely enough to set off the red light to delete the e-mails.
If that's not enough, then google the e-mail content if you're suspicious about it and it'll say if it's spam/torjan ect on the dot. So quit your whining, want crApple? Go for it, oh wait, they cost about 1.5k minimum, oh well guess you have to stick with your virus saturated 'Winblows' as I've heard it being called, computer.
Anti-virus + little computer knowledge = happy computer user
I haven't got a virus on my system for at least 3-5 years, so stop whining plox ktkxbai
#8
Posted 15 September 2010 - 06:43 AM
I could post info saying "Mr. X has been looking at midget-clown-bearded-women haven sex with donkeys wearing raincoats, and I have the surfing info to prove it!" That doesn't make it true, but Mr. X would probably pay cash to kill that lie. They'd sprinkle in a bit of your real history just to make it seem legit.
This is really ugly since the effects can reach beyond a person's financial well-being.
Commodore 64 with Modem cartridge. Tape drive. Zork. OKI thermal printer. 13 inch RCA color TV with tuning knob busted off. Atari 2600 joystick, and a list of all the best BBS numbers.
#9
Posted 15 September 2010 - 07:22 AM
This post has been edited by coastie65: 15 September 2010 - 03:46 PM
http://novabench.com/image/266589.png
______________________________________________________________
Gateway FX6800-01e----Intel Core i7 960 ( 3.2 GHz)---- Seagate Barracuda 750 Gb SATA II / 3.0 Hdd---- 6 Gb Crucial 1066 Mhz memory, running in Tri Channel conf-----Corsair TX650w PSU----- EVGA Nvidia GTX 560Ti 1gb GDDR5 Vram ----DVD +/- RW / CD ,RAM/DL Optical drive w/ Label Flash-----Gateway TBGM-01 Motherboard.... Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS w/ SP2; Samsung Synch Master 2243BWX 22" Monitor.
#10
Posted 15 September 2010 - 07:51 AM
#11
Posted 15 September 2010 - 12:40 PM
Abort, Retry, Epic Fail? _
#12
Posted 16 September 2010 - 01:35 PM
cryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:
arbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:
Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".
Linux/Unix is safer, not because few people use it, but because it has a better security at the beginning. I wish all you M$ fanboys would actually admit that Windows needs a lot of work.
#13
Posted 17 September 2010 - 06:17 AM
All of the above systems are bloated with patches and band-aids: bloated to the point that if PC hardware had not advanced so far, a mainframe would be required to run them.
#14
Posted 18 September 2010 - 11:08 PM
jw12321, on 16 September 2010 - 01:35 PM, said:
cryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:
arbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:
Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".
Linux/Unix is safer, not because few people use it, but because it has a better security at the beginning. I wish all you M$ fanboys would actually admit that Windows needs a lot of work.
Oh please! What a load of bull!
Wait a minute here. I use Unix and Linux among others. First Linux isn't Unix. The GPL (GNU Public License) under which Linux is licensed to the public is from ... GNU. Do you even know what GNU stands for? It stands for Gnu's Not Unix (GNU). Ironic eh? Source: The GNU Manifesto
"Better security at the beginning?" Oh really? Then please explain this:
hole in linux kernel provides root rights

My Ubuntu 10.04 LTS kernel being
~$ uname -a Linux installer-desktop 2.6.32-24-Generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:24:04 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
is vulnerable. And no kernel updates yet. Yes check the date of the vulnerability. Time is of the essence.
Quote
Posted by Soulskillon Saturday September 18, @08:20PM
from the everything-old-is-new-again dept. securitylinux oztiks writes with this excerpt from The H: "A vulnerability in the 32-bit compatibility mode of the current Linux kernel (and previous versions) for 64-bit systems can be exploited to escalate privileges. For instance, attackers can break into a system and exploit a hole in the web server to get complete root (also known as superuser) rights or permissions for a victim's system. According to a report, the problem occurs because the 32-bit call emulation layer does not check whether the call is truly in the Syscall table. Ben Hawkes, who discovered the problem, says the vulnerability can be exploited to execute arbitrary code with kernel rights. ... Hawkes says the vulnerability was discovered and remedied back in 2007, but at some point in 2008 kernel developers apparently removed the patch, reintroducing the vulnerability. The older exploit apparently only needed slight modifications to work with the new hole."
Nothing is safe. Not even Linux or OS X. Security depends on the weakest link in the chain, whatever sits between the chair and keyboard....
Security through awareness, not blind faith! Or worse, conceited fanboism.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Everything is a fine diamond in the hands of a skillful man; everything becomes polished glass in the hands of a fool.
~ Jean de la Fontaine – 17th century French Poet
This post has been edited by WinTard: 18 September 2010 - 11:58 PM
#15
Posted 19 September 2010 - 04:52 AM
cryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:
arbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:
Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".
#16
Posted 19 September 2010 - 04:55 AM
cryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:
arbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:
Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".
Thank you for you comments. I am 100% in agreement.
#17
Posted 21 September 2010 - 05:12 AM
Quote
64 Bit Linux Users: Secure Your Systems ASAP
Submitted by mcollins on Mon, 09/20/2010 - 19:56 :: Slashdot is reporting that a Linux kernel exploit is in the wild and happily rooting 64-bit Linux systems. Many FreeSWITCH users are running on 64-bit machines and therefore should be taking steps to protect themselves. The official issue is referred to as CVE-2010-3081. More information is available here.
Quote
Posted by timothyon Sunday September 19, @11:11PM
from the get-your-patch-on dept. securitylinuxit
An anonymous reader writes "Running 64-bit Linux? Haven't updated yet? You're probably being rooted as I type this. CVE-2010-3081, this week's second high-profile local root exploit in the Linux kernel, is compromising machines left and right. Almost all 64-bit machines are affected, and 'Ac1db1tch3z' (classy) published code to let any local user get a root shell. Ac1db1tch3z's exploit is more malicious than usual because it leaves a backdoor behind for itself to exploit later even if the hole is patched. Luckily, there's a tool you can run to see if you've already been exploited, courtesy of security company Ksplice, which beat most of the Linux vendors with a 'rebootless' version of the patch."
Oh well here I go. I'm probably going to reload all my Linux systems from bare metal, just in case... Actually, it's kind of fun and keeps one up-to-date.
~~~~~~~~~~
Pain is inevitable. Suffering optional.
~ Unknown source
#18
Posted 21 September 2010 - 05:45 AM
Help

























