PCWorld Forums

PCWorld Forums: Trojan Monitors Your Porn Surfing Habits, Threatens To Blackmail You - PCWorld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Trojan Monitors Your Porn Surfing Habits, Threatens To Blackmail You

#1 User is offline   PCWorld 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 103,723
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 14 September 2010 - 09:48 PM

Post your comments for Trojan Monitors Your Porn Surfing Habits, Threatens to Blackmail You here
0

#2 User is offline   arbitor 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: 31-December 09

Posted 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM

Ugh...another PC virus...ACHOO!...If only I had the stability of UNIX and protection of Mac OS X...Too bad so sad...
0

#3 User is offline   cryofpaine 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 08-February 10

Posted 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM

View Postarbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:

Ugh...another PC virus...ACHOO!...If only I had the stability of UNIX and protection of Mac OS X...Too bad so sad...

Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".
0

#4 User is offline   hiniberus 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 05-March 10

Posted 14 September 2010 - 11:33 PM

Arbitor, Mac OSX is 'claimed' to be 'safer' due to the fact that it has tiny market share so these guys would target the bigger money hole, that would be Windows. The moment OSX or any other Apple OS gets more than 20% market share or something like that, the following will happen:

1) You'll see Viruses ect popping up more for that OS

2) I'll be scratching my head wondering why people went ahead for OSX but shrug as it's their money down the drain.

Essentially, there's just 1 simple way of avoiding a virus like this.

READ THE SUBJECT, as with moth e-mail clients, there is the 'subject' field that has some info on the topic at hand or even the e-mail sender's name would instantly be a red flag when it's something like "ChEaP\/iGrA". There's a simple thing to do.

DELETE THOSE E-MAILS

Chirst, people shouldn't blindly download attachments or read e-mails from people they don't know or even from those that are from 'friends' as I stated, read the subject that that's quite likely enough to set off the red light to delete the e-mails.

If that's not enough, then google the e-mail content if you're suspicious about it and it'll say if it's spam/torjan ect on the dot. So quit your whining, want crApple? Go for it, oh wait, they cost about 1.5k minimum, oh well guess you have to stick with your virus saturated 'Winblows' as I've heard it being called, computer.

Anti-virus + little computer knowledge = happy computer user

I haven't got a virus on my system for at least 3-5 years, so stop whining plox ktkxbai
0

#5 User is offline   DTNick 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: PC World Editorial
  • Posts: 854
  • Joined: 15-October 07
  • Location:Right here, silly

Posted 14 September 2010 - 11:49 PM

Let's keep OS X out of this, please. No OS is invincible.
0

#6 User is offline   Soundjudgment 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 441
  • Joined: 22-January 10

Posted 15 September 2010 - 03:37 AM

$18?? I spend that on lunch. These thieves are small-fry.
0

#7 User is offline   RobertSeward 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 14-September 10

Posted 15 September 2010 - 04:19 AM

View Postarbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:

Ugh...another PC virus...ACHOO!...If only I had the stability of UNIX and protection of Mac OS X...Too bad so sad...


If only, UNIX and Mac OS X was WORTH writing virus's for.
0

#8 User is offline   gundark 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 386
  • Joined: 18-August 06
  • Location:In my chair

Posted 15 September 2010 - 06:43 AM

Really, nobody who falls for a click-scam is safe, even if they never surf porn sites. What's to stop them from posting false info about a person for this scam?

I could post info saying "Mr. X has been looking at midget-clown-bearded-women haven sex with donkeys wearing raincoats, and I have the surfing info to prove it!" That doesn't make it true, but Mr. X would probably pay cash to kill that lie. They'd sprinkle in a bit of your real history just to make it seem legit.

This is really ugly since the effects can reach beyond a person's financial well-being.
My rig:
Commodore 64 with Modem cartridge. Tape drive. Zork. OKI thermal printer. 13 inch RCA color TV with tuning knob busted off. Atari 2600 joystick, and a list of all the best BBS numbers.
0

#9 User is offline   coastie65 

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 19,673
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Henrico, Va.

Posted 15 September 2010 - 07:22 AM

Ok. Hijacked contact lists are NOT NEW and has been going on for awhile. I have gotten emails from frends that contained nothing more than a link. I did not click the link, but just deleted the email. I did contact the friend and inform them that their contact list had been hijacked. Got one from my brother that was using an address that he hadn't used in years ( an AOL address and he was using MSN ). This was a dead give away. DO NOT CLICK ON THE LINK as then your contact list be be hijacked as well. It has nothing to do with which OS you are running, or your security software. Email stuff such as contact lists are kept on the ISP servers and NOT in your computer, so whichever OS you may be using is not an issue.

This post has been edited by coastie65: 15 September 2010 - 03:46 PM

Coolermaster HAF 912 Case....ASUS P8Z68-VPro MOBO.....Intel Core i7 2600k Sandy Bridge ( 4.4 Ghz ).... Gelid Tranquillo cooler.... Samsung 830 256 GB SSD.... Primary HDD- WD 1TB Caviar Black SATA III /6.0 .... SECONDARY HDD - WD 1TB Caviar Black SATA II / 3.0....8Gb GSkill Ripjaws Series X 1600 Mhz Memory....Corsair AX850w PSU....EVGA GTX 680 Super Clocked Signature 2 Gb GDDR5 Video Card....Samsung CD/DVD RW, DL, DVD-Ram, w/ Lightscribe Optical Drive....Samsung SyncMaster 2243BWX 22" Monitor..... Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit OS


http://novabench.com/image/266589.png

______________________________________________________________

Gateway FX6800-01e----Intel Core i7 960 ( 3.2 GHz)---- Seagate Barracuda 750 Gb SATA II / 3.0 Hdd---- 6 Gb Crucial 1066 Mhz memory, running in Tri Channel conf-----Corsair TX650w PSU----- EVGA Nvidia GTX 560Ti 1gb GDDR5 Vram ----DVD +/- RW / CD ,RAM/DL Optical drive w/ Label Flash-----Gateway TBGM-01 Motherboard.... Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS w/ SP2; Samsung Synch Master 2243BWX 22" Monitor.
0

#10 User is offline   crosswordbob 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,031
  • Joined: 25-June 10

Posted 15 September 2010 - 07:51 AM

Misread the word "Porn" in the title as "Pom"; thought this was some sort of scam designed to exploit unpatriotic Australians.
If I dispute one single point in a post, that should not be taken as an indication that I agree/disagree with any other point made by that poster or anyone else in the thread. Or anywhere else. Ever.
0

#11 User is offline   oldschoolh4ck3r 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 880
  • Joined: 11-January 09

Posted 15 September 2010 - 12:40 PM

Question is, what is this 'public site' where the info is posted, and seriously, who cares?
---
Abort, Retry, Epic Fail? _
0

#12 User is offline   jw12321 

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: 18-October 09

Posted 16 September 2010 - 01:35 PM

View Postcryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:

View Postarbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:

Ugh...another PC virus...ACHOO!...If only I had the stability of UNIX and protection of Mac OS X...Too bad so sad...

Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".


Linux/Unix is safer, not because few people use it, but because it has a better security at the beginning. I wish all you M$ fanboys would actually admit that Windows needs a lot of work.
0

#13 User is offline   etaripami 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 30-April 09

Posted 17 September 2010 - 06:17 AM

Linux/Unix is based on 20 year-old technology; as is Windows (and Android and all the others). The world is overdue for an OS designed from scratch for current hardware and protocols; and for what users currently need.

All of the above systems are bloated with patches and band-aids: bloated to the point that if PC hardware had not advanced so far, a mainframe would be required to run them.
0

#14 User is offline   WinTard 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,513
  • Joined: 16-January 09
  • Location:Look behind you...

Posted 18 September 2010 - 11:08 PM

View Postjw12321, on 16 September 2010 - 01:35 PM, said:

View Postcryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:

View Postarbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:

Ugh...another PC virus...ACHOO!...If only I had the stability of UNIX and protection of Mac OS X...Too bad so sad...

Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".


Linux/Unix is safer, not because few people use it, but because it has a better security at the beginning. I wish all you M$ fanboys would actually admit that Windows needs a lot of work.


Oh please! What a load of bull!

Wait a minute here. I use Unix and Linux among others. First Linux isn't Unix. The GPL (GNU Public License) under which Linux is licensed to the public is from ... GNU. Do you even know what GNU stands for? It stands for Gnu's Not Unix (GNU). Ironic eh? Source: The GNU Manifesto

"Better security at the beginning?" Oh really? Then please explain this:

hole in linux kernel provides root rights
Posted Image

My Ubuntu 10.04 LTS kernel being
~$ uname -a
Linux installer-desktop 2.6.32-24-Generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:24:04 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

is vulnerable. And no kernel updates yet. Yes check the date of the vulnerability. Time is of the essence.

Quote

http://linux.slashdo...des-Root-Rights
Posted by Soulskillon Saturday September 18, @08:20PM
from the everything-old-is-new-again dept. securitylinux oztiks writes with this excerpt from The H: "A vulnerability in the 32-bit compatibility mode of the current Linux kernel (and previous versions) for 64-bit systems can be exploited to escalate privileges. For instance, attackers can break into a system and exploit a hole in the web server to get complete root (also known as superuser) rights or permissions for a victim's system. According to a report, the problem occurs because the 32-bit call emulation layer does not check whether the call is truly in the Syscall table. Ben Hawkes, who discovered the problem, says the vulnerability can be exploited to execute arbitrary code with kernel rights. ... Hawkes says the vulnerability was discovered and remedied back in 2007, but at some point in 2008 kernel developers apparently removed the patch, reintroducing the vulnerability. The older exploit apparently only needed slight modifications to work with the new hole."


Nothing is safe. Not even Linux or OS X. Security depends on the weakest link in the chain, whatever sits between the chair and keyboard....

Security through awareness, not blind faith! Or worse, conceited fanboism.

~~~~~~~~~~~
Everything is a fine diamond in the hands of a skillful man; everything becomes polished glass in the hands of a fool.
~ Jean de la Fontaine – 17th century French Poet

This post has been edited by WinTard: 18 September 2010 - 11:58 PM

Disclaimer: This is just my humble opinion -- In a free world, is everyone is entitled to their own opinions?
Spoiler
0

#15 User is offline   Calogero1018 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 19-September 10

Posted 19 September 2010 - 04:52 AM

View Postcryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:

View Postarbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:

Ugh...another PC virus...ACHOO!...If only I had the stability of UNIX and protection of Mac OS X...Too bad so sad...

Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".

0

#16 User is offline   Calogero1018 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 19-September 10

Posted 19 September 2010 - 04:55 AM

View Postcryofpaine, on 14 September 2010 - 11:30 PM, said:

View Postarbitor, on 14 September 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:

Ugh...another PC virus...ACHOO!...If only I had the stability of UNIX and protection of Mac OS X...Too bad so sad...

Wow, shocking. Another PC virus, and another "PC's are evil, Mac/UNIX/Linux is God" post. Seriously I wish that people would switch, at least long enough for the hackers to take notice and swing the bullseye off of MS and onto Apple and the rest. Then us "PCdiots" can have a chance to laugh when everyone realizes that the only 'security' that these systems have is the fact that they're too small a target for hackers. The second that the market share is big enough, hackers will be all over them, only it would be even worse, with this 'nothing can touch me' attitude. I'd rather take my chances with my security system and guard dogs and deadbolts and armed guards out front, than walk around with no doors and no windows and my hands over my face saying "you can't see me".

Thank you for you comments. I am 100% in agreement.
0

#17 User is offline   WinTard 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,513
  • Joined: 16-January 09
  • Location:Look behind you...

Posted 21 September 2010 - 05:12 AM

Interesting developments regarding rooting of Linux.

Quote

http://freeswitch.org/
64 Bit Linux Users: Secure Your Systems ASAP
Submitted by mcollins on Mon, 09/20/2010 - 19:56 :: Slashdot is reporting that a Linux kernel exploit is in the wild and happily rooting 64-bit Linux systems. Many FreeSWITCH users are running on 64-bit machines and therefore should be taking steps to protect themselves. The official issue is referred to as CVE-2010-3081. More information is available here.


Quote

http://linux.slashdo...64-Bit-Machines
Posted by timothyon Sunday September 19, @11:11PM
from the get-your-patch-on dept. securitylinuxit
An anonymous reader writes "Running 64-bit Linux? Haven't updated yet? You're probably being rooted as I type this. CVE-2010-3081, this week's second high-profile local root exploit in the Linux kernel, is compromising machines left and right. Almost all 64-bit machines are affected, and 'Ac1db1tch3z' (classy) published code to let any local user get a root shell. Ac1db1tch3z's exploit is more malicious than usual because it leaves a backdoor behind for itself to exploit later even if the hole is patched. Luckily, there's a tool you can run to see if you've already been exploited, courtesy of security company Ksplice, which beat most of the Linux vendors with a 'rebootless' version of the patch."


Oh well here I go. I'm probably going to reload all my Linux systems from bare metal, just in case... Actually, it's kind of fun and keeps one up-to-date.

~~~~~~~~~~
Pain is inevitable. Suffering optional.
~ Unknown source

Disclaimer: This is just my humble opinion -- In a free world, is everyone is entitled to their own opinions?
Spoiler
0

#18 User is offline   mjd420nova 

  • Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,977
  • Joined: 05-August 06
  • Location:Fremont, California

Posted 21 September 2010 - 05:45 AM

The proverbial OPERATOR MALFUNCTION. Yes, if users would just keep their surfing habits under control and within a moral set of boundaries, well, the hackers just take advantage of whenever and whereever they can. Things loaded within video streams can make nifty hiding places for all kinds of nasty things. And a good reliable backup scheme does wonders for getting an operating system to perform above spec with a minimum of hassle and cluttered with a task bar that has more icons than are present on the desktop. So many IMs and virus checkers and then toss in Adobe, Flash and Nvidia. Sound cards are another neccesary evil if you want a seamless operation but too many others needlessly want to stick start up items, shortcuts and quickstarts. Where does it stop?? Right there on the piece of padded foam atop your favorite chair. The user.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users