Page 1 of 1
Firewall-what's a good one?
#1
Posted 10 February 2007 - 01:02 PM
I just removed my Norton spyware and firewall. I loaded Avast for spyware protection and I have Ad-aware and Superanti-spyware and I have not deactivated my SP2 which has it's own firewall I'm told. Sygate was recommended to me but I'm not qualified to download it.Thanks in advance guys & gals.BC
#6
Posted 11 February 2007 - 07:32 AM
I'm currently trying out Comodo Firewall Pro (freeware) and it seems to be doing pretty well. One thing I especially like about it is it gives you a lot more options and a lot more information about what your computer is doing than Zone Alarm Free does.I've been a loyal Zone Alarm customer for years, but I have to admit Comodo is pretty impressive. It passed every security check I threw at it, including stealthing all ports. I'm going to give it a long-term test. One reason I worry about Zone Alarm is that it's become so common and well known it makes an attractive target for hackers to look for holes.http://personalfirewall.comodo.com/EDIT: Just read an article on Dark Reading, an IT security website ( http://www.darkreadi...ocument.asp?docid=111976 ), which rates Comodo as the best firewall available - period.[/code]BTW, the same tests revealed Microsoft's built-in XP firewall to be literally worthless with a score of 0. You read that right: zero!http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-personal-firewall-analysis/leak-tests-results.php#firewalls-ratings
#7
Posted 11 February 2007 - 02:35 PM
I've used both the free version of Zonealarm and Sygate to protect my computer. They both work exceptionally well-- however, if you choose to run a home network, use Sygate instead of Zonealarm, or else you'll be required to purchase the pro version of zonealarm. I also despise the windows firewall, which is why I always install Zonealarm instead of using the windows firewall.
#8
Posted 11 February 2007 - 10:06 PM
are there any firewalls that rate lower in quality than the windows firewall for xp? it doesn't block outgoing connections. if a hacker gets into your computer, he gets to have a field day. i used zone alarm on my win98 with excellent results. with this xp, i had compatibility problems, so i uninstalled it. months later i still get emails from them. zone alarm personal needed a high/medium and a medium/low setting to go with high, medium and low. not enough options.
#9
Posted 12 February 2007 - 04:34 AM
[quote name='ejames82']are there any firewalls that rate lower in quality than the windows firewall for xp? it doesn't block outgoing connections. if a hacker gets into your computer, he gets to have a field day. > > i used zone alarm on my win98 with excellent results. with this xp, i had compatibility problems, so i uninstalled it. months later i still get emails from them. zone alarm personal needed a high/medium and a medium/low setting to go with high, medium and low. not enough options.Actually, the built-in firewall in XP blocked outgoing connections as of Service Pack 2. It just doesn't work very well in either direction. I would argue that a security measure that doesn't work is probably worse than not having one at all because the owner gets a false sense of security and does stupid things because he thinks he's safe.
#13
Posted 14 February 2007 - 10:33 PM
Are you using cable/dsl? Buy a router, even if you only have one PC. It will serve as a hardware firewall and is a worthwhile investment. You can usually find wireless ones cheaper than wired, but it's relatively simple to deactivate the wireless if you don't need it (so people won't leech)
#14
Posted 15 February 2007 - 01:57 AM
[quote name='BC63']I just removed my Norton spyware and firewall. I loaded Avast for spyware protection and I have Ad-aware and Superanti-spyware and I have not deactivated my SP2 which has it's own firewall I'm told. Sygate was recommended to me but I'm not qualified to download it.> > Thanks in advance guys & gals.> > > > BCZone alarm is Free and excellent..
Page 1 of 1
Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote
