Picture Issue
#1
Posted 14 March 2011 - 07:26 PM
Thanks
If you would like to know more about me or my company feel free to send me a message and I will be more then happy to talk with you.
Erik
Mylo Corp
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sony VAIO E Series laptop
- Intel Core i5-2450M Dual Core Processor 3MB
- 2.50Ghz with Intel Turbo Boost Technalogy up to 3.10Ghz
- Intel HD Graphics 300
- 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz
- 240GB Samsung Solid State disk drive
- Windows8 64bit
#2
Posted 15 March 2011 - 07:49 AM
Ericuse165, on 14 March 2011 - 07:26 PM, said:
Thanks
Hi, Eric. What kind of TV do you have. Specifically, I'd like to know how old it is and the basic technology (Plasma, LCD, etc.).
Lincoln
#3
Posted 15 March 2011 - 01:12 PM
If you would like to know more about me or my company feel free to send me a message and I will be more then happy to talk with you.
Erik
Mylo Corp
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sony VAIO E Series laptop
- Intel Core i5-2450M Dual Core Processor 3MB
- 2.50Ghz with Intel Turbo Boost Technalogy up to 3.10Ghz
- Intel HD Graphics 300
- 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz
- 240GB Samsung Solid State disk drive
- Windows8 64bit
#4
Posted 16 March 2011 - 07:42 AM
Ericuse165, on 15 March 2011 - 01:12 PM, said:
That's a 120hz LCD, which shouldn't have motion problems. Of course, "shouldn't" and "doesn't" aren't always the same thing.
Here's what I suggest: There's a feature on that TV called TruMotion (maybe TruMotion 120Hz). It's supposed to produce smoother motion, but this sort of feature often does more harm than good. (See Would a 120 or 240hz HDTV Produce a Better Picture?) Somewhere in the main menu system you can turn this option on or off, and maybe turn it down, as well. Find that option and fiddle with it.
Lincoln
#5
Posted 17 March 2011 - 09:18 PM
If you would like to know more about me or my company feel free to send me a message and I will be more then happy to talk with you.
Erik
Mylo Corp
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sony VAIO E Series laptop
- Intel Core i5-2450M Dual Core Processor 3MB
- 2.50Ghz with Intel Turbo Boost Technalogy up to 3.10Ghz
- Intel HD Graphics 300
- 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz
- 240GB Samsung Solid State disk drive
- Windows8 64bit
#6
Posted 18 March 2011 - 02:32 PM
If so, what you are looking at is a result of Interlaced content used by cheap HD providers, and all OTA SD content. What is happening is that full image is not being drawn every frame, just 1/2 the screen - odd lines one time, even the next. Usually, the TV compensates for this on its own if the receiving device sends the original signal. Sometimes the tuning device tries to send the TV the signal it wants without correcting the actual image though, and the TV doesn't know to fix it.
And in some cases, the image just never gets fixed... What you are looking for in this case is an option to De-Interlace. If you use Component video cables, then I can pretty well guarantee that the TV get sent a 1080i signal, and not a 1080P. The set may have a better chance of recognizing the frame issue, and correct the image.
For what it is worth - this is an issue no matter what the refresh rate is. If you have it set up for 120 hz, then it will continue to draw the incomplete frames, and not help anything.
Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png
#7
Posted 18 March 2011 - 08:13 PM
If you would like to know more about me or my company feel free to send me a message and I will be more then happy to talk with you.
Erik
Mylo Corp
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sony VAIO E Series laptop
- Intel Core i5-2450M Dual Core Processor 3MB
- 2.50Ghz with Intel Turbo Boost Technalogy up to 3.10Ghz
- Intel HD Graphics 300
- 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz
- 240GB Samsung Solid State disk drive
- Windows8 64bit
#8
Posted 19 March 2011 - 12:11 PM
Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png
#9
Posted 19 March 2011 - 12:27 PM
Thank you very much
If you would like to know more about me or my company feel free to send me a message and I will be more then happy to talk with you.
Erik
Mylo Corp
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sony VAIO E Series laptop
- Intel Core i5-2450M Dual Core Processor 3MB
- 2.50Ghz with Intel Turbo Boost Technalogy up to 3.10Ghz
- Intel HD Graphics 300
- 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz
- 240GB Samsung Solid State disk drive
- Windows8 64bit
#10
Posted 20 March 2011 - 11:42 AM
Ericuse165, on 19 March 2011 - 12:27 PM, said:
Thank you very much
No reason to apologize. Component will not improve anything. (Nor, for that matter, will it hurt with a set-top box--although it will with a Blu-ray player.)
waldojim made a very good (and probably correct) guess that it was interlacing, and included a good explanation of what it is. I'd like to follow that up with an explanation of how your set-top box's settings may be effecting that.
There are two standards for broadcast HDTV: 720p and 1080i. 720p is not interlaced, so it doesn't have that problem. But it's a lower resolution. 1080i has a higher resolution, but is interlaced. 1080p combines the best of both worlds, but doesn't exist in broadcasts.
A lot of sports are broadcast in 720p because with fast action, interlacing does more harm than a lower resolution. But some networks broadcast sports in 1080i.
Both 720p and 1080i signals have to be converted to 1080p to play on a modern HDTV. The 720p signal has to be upconverted and the 1080i one has to be deinterlaced. Both of these can be done by either the set-top box or the HDTV itself. I can't tell you which does a better job, but it's probably not the one you're using. As a general rule, I think that HDTVs usually do a better job here.
You can control who does these by how you set your set-top box's resolution. I don't know what settings are available on your box, but here are some common options and what they will do to the signal.
Native resolution: The box sends the signals to the HDTV without processing it, letting the HDTV do the upconverting and deinterlacing. Assuming that your HDTV does a better job converting the images (likely) and your box has this option (less likely), it's the best solution.
1080p: The box handles everything, de-interlacing the 1080i signal and up-converting the 720p. This is probably your best bet if the box doesn't offer native resolution or does a better converting job than the HDTV.
1080i: This is a pretty serious compromise if you're watching stations that broadcast in 702p, because it will add interlacing to a signal that otherwise doesn't have it. OTOH, it's fine for a 1080i signal.
720p: The reverse of the above.
Lincoln
#11
Posted 21 March 2011 - 01:29 AM
Ericuse165, on 19 March 2011 - 12:27 PM, said:
Thank you very much
The cable should be perfectly fine.
As Lincoln mentioned above, try experimenting with the output format on the box. If you cannot find the menu option, your best bet is to call customer service for that - as the software, and menus change a lot on those boxes.
If you already own a set of Component cables though, it never hurts to make it easy to prove if that is the issue. As I mentioned above - on most systems 1080i is the limit for component cables, and this will easily force the issue, and prove one way or another that this is the issue.
This post has been edited by waldojim: 21 March 2011 - 01:32 AM
Lenovo W520 CTO Intel i7-2620m, 8GB Patriot ram @ 1333Mhz, Nvidia Quadro 1000m with 2GB GDRR3, Plextor M3 256GB SSD, 1080P wide color display, Windows 8 Pro
Media Center: Intel Core i5 760 @ 3.1Ghz, 4GB DDR3, Corsair GS600PSU, EVGA Geforce 550ti, EVGA P55 SLI, 3x 1TB raid 5, 1x 1TB boot drive, Windows 8 Pro, Win TV 950(USB), Pioneer BR.
Server: AMD Phenom X4 945 @ 3.0Ghz, MSI 790FX-GD70, 16gb ddr3 RAM @ 1333mhz, 2TB Seagate HDD, 64GB Patriot SSD, Asus Silent Gefore 210
The Green machine: AMD Sempron 145EE Unlocked and OC'd to 4.1Ghz, Gigabyte GD970A-DS3, 8GB ram @ 1600mhz, Nvidia 550Ti, Thermaltake BlueOrb, Antec EW385
Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Paranoid Android 4.2 Rom http://www.speedtest...d/315465831.png
#12
Posted 22 March 2011 - 02:00 PM
Eric
If you would like to know more about me or my company feel free to send me a message and I will be more then happy to talk with you.
Erik
Mylo Corp
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sony VAIO E Series laptop
- Intel Core i5-2450M Dual Core Processor 3MB
- 2.50Ghz with Intel Turbo Boost Technalogy up to 3.10Ghz
- Intel HD Graphics 300
- 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz
- 240GB Samsung Solid State disk drive
- Windows8 64bit
Help














