The 15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007
#42
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:23 AM
much that I printed business cards and distributed
them to Internet Caf??s and Camera Shops.
All of them, really ALL, are buyers of laptops. Acer, HP,
Panasonic, and Sony, it does not matter. And the
conversion is a real pain because a lot of those new
laptops do not have support for XP, I mean you can't
even download the drivers from the manufacturer's
website.
I read a lot of "Vista is not bad" on news sites, but from
my point of view, from comments I receive from
switchers, and from my own experience, it really sucks.
Most of those computers are 5 to 10 times slower on
Vista than on XP because the manufactuers sell them
below of on the edge of Vista's memory requirements.
And Vista is so ackward to use than people are doing
less with it than they were doing on XP. For my part, I
can't stand it, and I don't have the interest to fight with
it because none of what has been changed makes
sense.
Anyway, continue to defend Vista, but you can't change
the lanslide: ordinary people are switching to XP. This
is going to be the biggest subject discussed over
XMass.
#43
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:39 AM
True Disappointments
1 vista
2 high-def wars
3 yahoo
7 voip
14 municipal wimax
What are you talking about?
5 iphone
8 leopard 10.5
9 office 2007
10 wireless carriers
11 zune
12 internet security
Who cares?
3 facebook beacon
6 broadband
13 social networks
15 amazon unbox
What would you change?
#44
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:49 AM
I really admire good old Bill, he's not only a software giant but also a great entomologist, he loves buggy software.
Wake up, Windows users, havn't Garbagesoft abuse you enough?
I say: Hastala Vista, baby, It's time to ditch Windows.
#46
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:03 AM
#49
Posted 18 December 2007 - 07:47 AM
#51
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:56 AM
the iphone- it's a fine device but the final product didn't deliver half of the stuff it promised. the "mac os" for the phone is nothing compared to the "true" macos and yeah, steve jobs promised an sdk for february, but we talk about the same man that described the iphone as a "very tiny mac that can do the same"
leopard- for an OS that "just works", it shipped with tons of issues and bugs. on windows, your "windows experience" deppends on many things, so while my computer running vista runs just fine, I've met some people that say their vista runs like crap. however, leopard runs exclusively on mac computers and yet there are a lot of mac users complaining about how horrible leopard is an that it feels like a product they rushed to get out of the door.... the first "service pack" for leopard was released like a month after the os shipped...
so the real issue is about companies not delivering what they promised... microsoft did it, and so did apple, end of story.
#53
Posted 18 December 2007 - 12:42 PM
And while I certainly agree that Leopard has had a higher number of incidents than previous releases, I see the 10.5.1 update as a responsive move on Apple's part, don't you?. I'm afraid your true colors are showing through on this one. And you just got a look at my Mac .
If you are in fact, simply more critical than I am, why isn't Office 2007 with yet another interface, or the day late and dollar short Zune, on your dis-list?
You forgot, right? You can't possibly be serious, can you?
#54
Posted 18 December 2007 - 12:49 PM
As to HD formats, what sense does it make to opt for a system that is well over the price of the alternative with no improvement in performance. I think that HD DVD ought to come out ahead in the long run. Why not use HD DVD on one side of discs and Blu-Ray on the other like I've seen Netflix do?
#56
Posted 18 December 2007 - 03:25 PM
So both leopard and vista sucked when they were released but at least they're getting better. However, they both deserve to be on the list due to their initial release. Now some of the leopard's issues have been addressed thanks to that first "service pack" (although mac uses hate them when they call macos "updates" a "service pack") and (supposedly) vista will be faster, more stable and all that when the SP1 is released "somewhere in february".
As for windows ce. I've never used one and I wasn't keeping with the news so I don't know if ballmer or gates described a windows ce device as "your desktop on the palm of your hand" while jobs did. So, as I said, the disappointment for me is people not delivering what they said they would.
As for office 2007. I like it so I don't see why put it on my list, unless I have to base my list on your oppinions.
As for the zune. I remembered that the zune 1 was released a long time ago. I even remember that job's macworld keynote on february mentioned the zune 1, so even if it sucked it's not a "2007 product" hence it's not on my list. as for the zune 2, I've never used one either, but judging of what I've seen on reviews, videos and stuff I find it cool and, in some ways superior to the standard ipods.
So I didn't forget, and I am serious.
#58
Posted 19 December 2007 - 02:46 AM
The iPhone is a disappointment?!?!?! WTF? What consumer electronic device, with the possible exception of the iPod Nano, has sold anywhere near as well as the iPhone is selling since its release? I can't think of any of those customers that are forced to buy an iPhone. Apple must have done something right.
#59
Posted 19 December 2007 - 03:12 AM
After reading batres' criticism of my criticism of him, I was speechless. How can I argue with that logic? How do I deal with the continuous flow of misinformation? How can I make sense out of his writing? And what does Windows 7 have to do with anything? I decided not to waste time on the youngster, but you were there to help.
You hit the nail on the head with your comments. And like I said, I owe you one. A big fat one!
#60
Posted 19 December 2007 - 04:37 AM
Let's look at your first sentence:
batres said:
>
Absolutely! Please explain to me why you don't.
Microsoft invented the current method of software distribution. Apple has had to react to Microsoft's lead on this one. My problem with either solution is that a high-speed Internet connection is required to make it work effectively. That leaves a percentage of their customers (my Dad has dial-up), in an awkward position.
But once you're hooked up, what a high level of service is provided. How can you not call this responsive?
Now, the situation Microsoft found itself in, with viruses, and trojans, and worms and such, forced the new solution. The old user initiated download method could not keep up with (or correctly apply), the barrage of patches necessary plug the holes in the security ship called Windows. But the solution seems to work pretty well. In fact, the first solution was too responsive. Administrators couldn't keep up. Which has led to the monthly cycle we are working with these days. Just a little fine tuning.
Don't ask the user too many questions. Let the system determine proper downloads. System integrity and user experience are both enhanced. This is good stuff. What am I missing here?
We could argue that the content of the patches should have been in the core release, but I don't want to argue. Perhaps responsive turns to cya reactive, when the 'enhancements' are things you expected from the get go. But don't shoot the messenger. Help me understand your thinking.
Sorry to pick on you dude, but I must close with the english lesson for today; coming has one m, February should be capitalized and dare say is two words.
Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote